The dashboard had several oversized orchestration, component, and CSS files that made product-copy changes and mobile/performance work risky. This refactor preserves behavior while splitting scan terminal CSS, opportunity helpers, future forecast panels, history/detail charts, and probability/model sections into smaller ownership boundaries.
Constraint: No user-visible version bump because this batch is architecture and performance cleanup, not a release announcement.
Rejected: Rewrite dashboard state management in the same batch | too broad for a safe upload after CSS and component splitting.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Reversibility: clean
Directive: Keep new component/CSS boundaries instead of moving product copy back into the large dashboard files.
Tested: npm run build; npm run test:business; git diff --check
Not-tested: Browser visual smoke test after push
Weather labels, METAR translation, risk badges, and hero meta chips were still embedded in dashboard-utils even though panel, modal, and detail views use them as focused presentation helpers. This moves them into weather-summary-utils while keeping dashboard-utils re-export compatibility.
Constraint: Preserve existing weather/METAR/risk/hero meta wording.
Rejected: Move airport narrative in the same pass | it has broader AI narrative coupling and should be separated independently.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Tested: TypeScript diagnostics for weather-summary-utils, dashboard-utils, PanelSections, DetailPanel, and FutureForecastModal
Tested: npm run build
Not-tested: Visual snapshot of every weather icon/label combination.
Probability and multi-model view adapters were still embedded in dashboard-utils even though table, panel, modal, and city-card views use them as small pure selectors. This moves them into model-utils and keeps dashboard-utils re-export compatibility.
Constraint: Preserve model/probability return shapes and existing fallback behavior.
Rejected: Merge model-utils with chart-utils | model selectors and chart data preparation change at different rates.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Tested: TypeScript diagnostics for model-utils, dashboard-utils, and PanelSections
Tested: npm run build
Not-tested: Bundle analyzer size comparison.
The intraday chart data builder lived inside dashboard-utils with observation-source and TAF helpers, so chart consumers had to depend on the large dashboard utility surface. This moves chart data preparation, observation-source helpers, and TAF marker labels into focused modules while keeping dashboard-utils re-export compatibility.
Constraint: Preserve existing chart data shape, observation labels, TAF labels, and legacy dashboard-utils exports.
Rejected: Rewrite chart data generation while moving it | this pass is a boundary move only so visual behavior remains stable.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Reversibility: clean
Tested: TypeScript diagnostics for chart-utils, dashboard-utils, observation-source-utils, and taf-utils
Tested: npm run build
Not-tested: Browser visual regression across every chart city.
2569718930@qq.com