- Add copyback.py (in-sample copy backtest), oos.py (out-of-sample test), huntwide.py (wide insider sweep) — completes the detect→hunt→validate→watch pipeline. - Rewrite README around Winning Wallet Finder: the z-score idea explained, how the pieces fit, quickstart, data sources, live-watcher setup, honest verdict. - Extend FINDINGS with the insider-detection results and the in-sample vs out-of-sample copy verdict (+545% in-sample collapsed to one-wallet variance out-of-sample). - Refresh config.example.json to the current schema (discord/alchemy/watch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.0 KiB
🏆 Winning Wallet Finder
Find Polymarket wallets with a real, statistically-verifiable edge, test whether copying them actually makes money, and get pinged the moment they trade.
This started as "copy the smart money." Along the way we tested — and ruled out — six systematic public-data strategies, and found that the only signal that holds up is statistical improbability: wallets that win far more than the prices they paid imply. This repo is the tooling for finding and watching those wallets, plus an honest record of everything that didn't work.
Read
FINDINGS.mdfor the full story. TL;DR: detection of edge wallets works; profitably copying them is unproven (it survived a naive backtest but collapsed to one-wallet variance out-of-sample). Treat this as a research + monitoring tool, not a money printer.
The core idea: z-score, not win rate
Every Polymarket bet has an entry price that is the market's estimate of its odds (a YES at 30¢ ⇒ market thinks 30%). If you have no edge, over many bets you win about the sum of your entry prices — call it expected wins.
z = (actual wins − expected wins) / standard deviation
- z = 0 → you won exactly what your prices implied → no edge.
- z = 3 → ~1-in-740 by luck. z = 5 → ~1-in-3.5M. z = 9 → astronomical.
p(luck)is z as a probability: the chance a no-edge bettor does this well by chance.
Why this beats win rate: a wallet that bets longshots and wins 14% when the odds implied 8% has a huge edge (high z) despite a low win rate. A wallet buying 90¢ favorites and winning 90% has z≈0 — no edge, just paying for favorites. z measures beating the prices you paid.
Two refinements separate signal from noise:
- Lifetime trade count — high z + tens of thousands of trades = a market-maker bot, not an insider. Real edge wallets have concentrated edge over a few thousand trades.
- Pre-resolution timing + fresh wallet — entering minutes/hours before resolution on a new account is the insider fingerprint (the Bubblemaps / 60 Minutes pattern).
How the pieces fit
data layer detection hunting validation live
────────── ───────── ─────── ────────── ────
smart_money.py ──▶ insider.py ──▶ hunt.py / huntwide.py ─▶ copyback.py / oos.py webhook_receiver.py
(Polymarket API, (z-score, timing, (sweep markets, (does copying them (Alchemy webhook →
true win rate) freshness, funding surface edge wallets) actually pay? in- & Discord ping on
clustering) out-of-sample) every trade)
| File | Role |
|---|---|
insider.py |
The detector. z-score/p-value, pre-resolution timing, fresh-wallet & sizing flags, and Alchemy funding-cluster ring detection. --scan / --market / --wallet. |
smart_money.py |
Data foundation + dashboard. Survivorship-corrected true win rate. |
hunt.py |
Ring-hunt sweep over a fixed list of news-driven event markets. |
huntwide.py |
Wide sweep — source wallets from ~100 markets, score each, tier by z. |
copyback.py |
Backtest: copy edge wallets' entries from a date, weighted, compounding. |
oos.py |
Out-of-sample test — select wallets on pre-period data, copy forward. The honesty gate. |
webhook_receiver.py |
Push-based live watcher: Alchemy on-chain webhook → enrich → Discord. |
archive/ |
The six strategies that didn't work, kept for reference (details). |
Quickstart
Zero dependencies — Python 3 stdlib only (no pip install). macOS python.org
builds lack CA certs, so the code falls back to unverified SSL for these public
read-only APIs.
git clone https://github.com/jaxperro/winning-wallet-finder
cd winning-wallet-finder
cp config.example.json config.json # then edit (see Config below)
python3 insider.py --scan 40 # score the top-40 leaderboard wallets
python3 insider.py --market <slug> # score a market's traders + detect rings
python3 insider.py --wallet 0xABC… # deep-profile one wallet
python3 huntwide.py # wide sweep → huntwide.csv (tiered by z)
python3 oos.py # the out-of-sample copy test
python3 smart_money.py # dashboard at http://localhost:8899
Config (config.json, gitignored — holds your secrets)
{
"discord_webhook": "https://discord.com/api/webhooks/…", // alerts
"alchemy_key": "…", // Polygon RPC for funding-cluster detection
"alchemy_signing_key": "…", // verifies inbound webhook POSTs (live watcher)
"watch": [ {"wallet": "0x…", "name": "Famecesgoal"}, … ] // wallets to track
}
Data sources
| Source | Used for |
|---|---|
data-api.polymarket.com |
positions, trades, leaderboard, activity, true win rate |
gamma-api.polymarket.com |
market metadata, resolution times, best bid/ask |
clob.polymarket.com |
order books, prices, liquidity-reward configs |
api.elections.kalshi.com |
Kalshi prices (cross-venue arb research) |
| Alchemy (Polygon) | on-chain USDC funding traces + the live trade webhook |
Live watcher — get pinged on every trade
Push-based (no polling). The instant a tracked wallet's proxy transacts on
Polygon (~2–5s), Alchemy POSTs webhook_receiver.py, which enriches the trade
via the data-API and pings Discord: 🟢 Famecesgoal BUY Yes @ 0.34 ($120) — <market>.
- Discord webhook → set
DISCORD_WEBHOOKenv (orconfig.json). - Deploy the receiver to an always-on host (Railway / Fly / a $5 VPS — not
Render free, it sleeps).
Procfileincluded; binds to$PORT. - Alchemy → create an Address Activity webhook (Polygon mainnet), add the
watch.jsonaddresses, point it athttps://your-host/alchemy, and set the signing key asALCHEMY_SIGNING_KEY.
Keep the two wallet lists in sync: Alchemy's address list (what triggers) and
watch.json (what names the alert).
The honest verdict
- Detection works. z-score + timing + funding-cluster reliably surfaces statistically anomalous wallets (the 60-Minutes use case).
- Copying them is not proven. In-sample a weighted, compounding copy returned +545%; out-of-sample (select pre-May, copy forward) it was +168% — but driven entirely by one longshot lottery wallet, with the strongest signals contributing nothing. That's variance, not a durable, fundable edge.
- No turnkey public-data edge survived — copy-trading, win-rate ranking, LP
reward farming, binary/multi-outcome arb, and cross-venue arb all came back
efficient or illusory. See
FINDINGS.md.
Use this to find and watch edge wallets and gather forward data — not as a green light to bet size on copying them.