Files
winning-wallet-finder_github/archive/README.md
T
jaxperro 34d02956d8 Archive dead-end strategies; add FINDINGS.md write-up
Moved the 8 tested-and-failed strategy tools into archive/ (copytrade, backtest,
edge_research, lookback, table_77, lp_screener, lp_paper, xarb) with an
archive/README explaining each. Root now holds the keepers: insider.py (made
self-sufficient — dropped the copytrade load_json dependency) and smart_money.py
(data foundation). New FINDINGS.md is the honest scorecard: six systematic
public-data edges all efficient/illusory, the win-rate survivorship-bias
finding, and the one real signal (z-score improbability + funding clustering).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-13 13:09:56 -04:00

22 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Archive — strategies that didn't work
These tools were built and tested during the research in
[`../FINDINGS.md`](../FINDINGS.md). They all proved to be dead ends (the market
is efficient / the metric was biased), so they're archived here for reference
rather than deleted. Each one *works* as written — it's the *strategy* that
didn't clear. They import `smart_money`/`copytrade` from the repo root, so to
run one you'd adjust the import path.
| File | What it did | Why it's here |
|------|-------------|---------------|
| `copytrade.py` | Paper/live copy-trade engine — mirror a watchlist's entries/exits, % -of-bankroll sizing, price guard, per-position cap, Discord alerts. | Copying entries is EV; followed wallets win ~50%. Backtested 48%. |
| `backtest.py` | Replay a watchlist over a window, mark outcomes from resolution. | The tool that proved copy-trading loses. |
| `edge_research.py` | Scan ~2000 wallets for reliable weekly consistency (% green weeks, profit factor, Sharpe). | "Consistent" wallets were mostly young accounts (survivorship); no durable edge. |
| `lookback.py` | Deep-dive a wallet list over a long window, split into halves for out-of-sample reads. | Showed the "best" wallets had <90 days of history. |
| `table_77.py` | Aggregate a wallet set to CSV (ROI, total staked, consistency). | Supported the above; ROI inversely related to size. |
| `lp_screener.py` | Rank reward-eligible markets by risk-adjusted LP yield. | The high APRs were illusory — see `lp_paper`. |
| `lp_paper.py` | Paper liquidity-provision loop: simulate quoting, track net = rewards adverse selection. | Polymarket refunds unearned reward pool; thin-book "jackpots" don't pay. |
| `xarb.py` | Cross-venue scanner: match the same event on Polymarket vs Kalshi, flag price gaps. | Venues priced efficiently (~1¢); both legs cost >$1 after fees. |
The keeper that came out of all this lives at the repo root: `insider.py`.