Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jaxperro 28fdf7f42b docs: document copy-positive selection, Copy P&L, cache-based portfolio
Update the dev-facing docs so others can follow the current system:
- live/README: copy-positive-holder selection (replaces lead-time gate),
  Copy P&L as the copyability metric, new Paper portfolio (portfolio.py)
  + Dashboard feeds (watch_sharps.json / portfolio.json) sections, the
  full 8-step daily flow, the cache rolling-180d/replace retention gotcha,
  and a Copy execution (copybot/sync_floors, separate WIP) note.
- README: top portfolio is now precomputed off the cache (correct
  recycling), judge by Copy P&L not win%, copy execution is separate.
- FINDINGS: capital-recycling / $1k-book section + repo-layout refresh.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 14:51:04 -06:00
jaxperro 0bb3192321 docs: document Copy P&L finding (position win% != copyability)
README/FINDINGS/live/README updated for today's discovery: the sharps
win% is a position snapshot that over-counts scalpers; copy_pnl (flat-$50
replay, authoritative clob resolution) is the real copyability signal.
Most "sharps" lose copied; only Kruto2027 + fortuneking are copy-positive
(now the tracked pair). Refreshed stale counts (50 -> ~31 after the
30d-active filter) and noted position-level conviction.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 12:45:29 -06:00
jaxperro 2ee8e79d00 rename timing "insider" verdict -> "last-minute" (honest label)
The lead-time gate in validate_timing.py is a COPYABILITY heuristic, not
proof of inside information: a short entry->resolution lead can be a
genuine insider OR just someone who trades fast-resolving markets (live
sports, hourly) well — indistinguishable, and irrelevant for copy
purposes since either way the window is too tight to mirror. Rename the
verdict accordingly. Gate unchanged (median lead >=24h to count as a
copyable sharp; 50 sharps). Docs updated to current p80 numbers
(218 profile matches, 62/83 forward-profitable, 50 sharps).

The genuine insider-detection scanner (insider.py, z-score / Bubblemaps
fingerprint) keeps its name — that's a different, correctly-named thing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-22 14:55:43 -06:00
jaxperro 1cbe1a67b9 conviction = per-wallet top-20% stake (p80), not flat $200
Swap the flat $200 conviction cutoff for a per-wallet percentile (top
20% of each wallet's own stake sizes) everywhere it was used:

- cache.py: canonical CONV_PCTILE=0.80 + conv_cutoff() helper (matches
  the dashboard's pctl: filter >0, sort, linear interp)
- conviction_scan.py: per-wallet quantile_cont(size,0.8) in SQL, was
  `size >= 200`
- validate_timing.py, pnl_focused.py: use cache.conv_cutoff

Rationale + validation: p80 reproduces flat-$200's win-rate lift on the
sharps while adapting to scale (a whale's $200 isn't conviction, a
minnow's is). Re-running the pipeline under p80: scan finds 218 profile
wallets (was 69), forward 62/83 profitable (p~0), +16% pooled ROI — edge
persists out-of-sample. Regenerated conviction_wallets.json /
watch_sharps.json; docs updated. skill.py/strategy.py/insider.py
untouched (score over all bets / size as copyability heuristic only).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-22 14:47:39 -06:00
jaxperro dc5195e373 docs: document conviction-profile scan + timing gate + 23 copyable sharps
README/FINDINGS/live-README now cover the repeatable find: score high-conviction
(>=$200) bets, validate forward (25/37 profitable, p=0.024), then a lead-time
gate drops uncopyable insiders -> 23 validated copyable sharps shown live on
jaxperro.com/trading.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-19 09:43:27 -06:00
jaxperro 0c7d97c5d0 live: train/test wallet-selection study + capital-constrained copy sims
strategy.py (train pre-May-30 / test June1+ on copy-ROI + z + consistency +
diversification) and followability.py (entry-time/lead-time/cadence filter)
surface wallets with real, copyable, out-of-sample edge (49/77 profitable
forward, p=0.011, +23.4% pooled).

pnl_basket.py / pnl_focused.py add $1000 capital-constrained copy sims with
missed-trade accounting: the broad basket loses (can't follow 1,200 trades on
$1k), but 1-2 wallets + a conviction (bet-size) filter clears out-of-sample.
cache.py gains entry-time caching. Findings documented.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 16:38:41 -06:00
jaxperro 3d0bc7f001 Add live/ skilled-wallet scanner + cache; document clean OOS finding
live/: operationalizes the LBS/Yale "skilled ~3%" result against the live
data-api. Enumerate recent liquid markets -> top traders -> candidate pool;
cache every wallet's resolved bets once in DuckDB (~26k wallets / 12.5M bets,
keyed by per-bet resolution time so any cutoff re-scores in seconds); 5-gate
skill funnel (n>=15, z>0, BH-FDR, split-half OOS, MM/bot cap); dashboard +
daily refresh.

Key finding: copying the high-win-rate "favorite-rider" cohort looks +23.6%
in-sample but loses -7.4% once selected on pre-June-1 data only (99% -> 68%
win rate) — selection bias, reproducing the paper's "lucky winners revert"
result on live data. Win rate != edge, again.

wide/: bulk subgraph->DuckDB scanner (survivorship-bias-free over all wallets),
but the public subgraph is frozen at Jan 2026 -> historical tool only.

Large local data (*.duckdb, candidates.json, *_scored.json, history/) gitignored.
README + FINDINGS updated with the current logic and the clean result.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 11:16:20 -06:00
jaxperro f176ba134a Rebrand to Winning Wallet Finder; commit validation scripts; dev-friendly docs
- Add copyback.py (in-sample copy backtest), oos.py (out-of-sample test),
  huntwide.py (wide insider sweep) — completes the detect→hunt→validate→watch
  pipeline.
- Rewrite README around Winning Wallet Finder: the z-score idea explained, how
  the pieces fit, quickstart, data sources, live-watcher setup, honest verdict.
- Extend FINDINGS with the insider-detection results and the in-sample vs
  out-of-sample copy verdict (+545% in-sample collapsed to one-wallet variance
  out-of-sample).
- Refresh config.example.json to the current schema (discord/alchemy/watch).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-13 16:59:18 -04:00
jaxperro 34d02956d8 Archive dead-end strategies; add FINDINGS.md write-up
Moved the 8 tested-and-failed strategy tools into archive/ (copytrade, backtest,
edge_research, lookback, table_77, lp_screener, lp_paper, xarb) with an
archive/README explaining each. Root now holds the keepers: insider.py (made
self-sufficient — dropped the copytrade load_json dependency) and smart_money.py
(data foundation). New FINDINGS.md is the honest scorecard: six systematic
public-data edges all efficient/illusory, the win-rate survivorship-bias
finding, and the one real signal (z-score improbability + funding clustering).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-13 13:09:56 -04:00