kingchenc
221f7a71bc
Adds five new issue templates (bug_report_detailed, feature_request_detailed, performance_regression, documentation, question) alongside the existing short forms, plus an optional detailed PR template under .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/ that contributors can opt into via the ?template=detailed.md URL. Existing templates keep their behavior; only title prefixes and prose-paren wording were capitalized for consistency.
56 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
56 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: Feature request (Detailed)
|
|
about: Long-form proposal with API sketch, scope checkboxes, prior-art links, and contribution intent.
|
|
title: "[Feat] <short description>"
|
|
labels: ["enhancement", "triage"]
|
|
assignees: []
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Problem / motivation
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
What are you trying to do that Wickra doesn't support today?
|
|
Describe the user-facing pain point, not the implementation.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Proposed solution
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Sketch the API or behavior you'd like. A short code snippet of how
|
|
you'd want to call it is worth a thousand words.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
import wickra as ta
|
|
|
|
# proposed API
|
|
ind = ta.SuperTrend(period=10, multiplier=3.0)
|
|
ind.update(close, high, low)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Scope
|
|
|
|
- [ ] New indicator
|
|
- [ ] New method on an existing indicator
|
|
- [ ] New binding / platform target
|
|
- [ ] Performance improvement
|
|
- [ ] Ergonomics / API cleanup
|
|
- [ ] Other (Explain below)
|
|
|
|
## Reference / prior art
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Link the paper, book chapter, TA-Lib function, TradingView Pine source,
|
|
or other implementations you'd like Wickra to match.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Alternatives considered
|
|
|
|
<!-- What workarounds exist today? Why aren't they enough? -->
|
|
|
|
## Willingness to contribute
|
|
|
|
- [ ] I'd like to implement this myself with guidance
|
|
- [ ] I can help review / test
|
|
- [ ] Requesting only — no bandwidth to implement
|