test: 100% coverage for mfi + psar + cmf + hma + obv (#27)
* test(mfi): cover period accessor, name, flat-TP fallback Codecov flagged 8 lines in indicators/mfi.rs (file at 93.10%): const accessor period (58-60), (0.0, 0.0) arm when tp==prev (85), the Some(50.0) flat-flow fallback (105), and Indicator-impl name body (132-134). Add accessors_and_metadata and flat_typical_prices_default_to_50. mfi.rs now at 116/116. * test(psar): cover warmup/name, drop cold format-arg + panic-only asserts Codecov flagged 8 lines in indicators/psar.rs (file at 95.69%): warmup_period (206-208), name (220-222), the cold format-arg line 254 in pure_uptrend_sar_below_lows, and the in-loop assert! at line 275 in pure_downtrend_sar_above_highs (its panic body is dead). Add accessors_and_metadata for warmup/name. Refactor both trend tests to collect violations into a Vec and assert once outside the loop — the single assert can now legitimately reach its panic body in a regression, while removing the dead cold-path lines from the happy-path coverage. * test(cmf): cover period accessor, name, zero-range branch Codecov flagged 7 lines in indicators/cmf.rs (file at 95.03%): const accessor period (71-73), the range==0.0 zero-MFV branch (84), and Indicator-impl name body (124-126). Add accessors_and_metadata and zero_range_candle_contributes_zero_mfv (flat H=L=close candles). cmf.rs now at 141/141. * test(hma): cover period accessor + name, kill dead naive panic arm Codecov flagged 7 lines in indicators/hma.rs (file at 92.22%): const accessor period (51-53), Indicator-impl name body (87-89), and the unreachable arm at line 167 in matches_independent_wmas. Refactor that test to assert the warmup-shape invariant via assert_eq!(got.is_some(), want.is_some()) + if let, removing the dead panic arm. Add accessors_and_metadata covering period/name. hma.rs now at 90/90. * test(obv): cover value() Some branch + warmup/name metadata Codecov flagged 7 lines in indicators/obv.rs (file at 92.92%): the Some(self.total) branch of value() (47) — only the None branch was hit by reset_clears_state — plus Indicator-impl warmup_period (79-81), name (87-89). Add accessors_and_metadata covering all four. obv.rs now at 99/99.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -214,6 +214,34 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
assert!(matches!(ChaikinMoneyFlow::new(0), Err(Error::PeriodZero)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Cover the const accessor `period` (71-73) and the Indicator-impl
|
||||
/// `name` body (124-126). `warmup_period` is covered elsewhere.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
|
||||
let cmf = ChaikinMoneyFlow::new(20).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(cmf.period(), 20);
|
||||
assert_eq!(cmf.name(), "CMF");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Cover the `range == 0.0` defensive branch (line 84). All other
|
||||
/// tests use H != L candles; feed all-flat candles (H == L) so the
|
||||
/// MFV computation must take the zero-range fallback and emit MFV = 0.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn zero_range_candle_contributes_zero_mfv() {
|
||||
let mut cmf = ChaikinMoneyFlow::new(3).unwrap();
|
||||
let candles: Vec<Candle> = (0..5)
|
||||
.map(|i| Candle::new(10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 5.0, i).unwrap())
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let last = cmf
|
||||
.batch(&candles)
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.flatten()
|
||||
.last()
|
||||
.expect("emits");
|
||||
// Every bar contributed 0 to mfv_sum, so the ratio is 0.
|
||||
assert_eq!(last, 0.0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reset_clears_state() {
|
||||
let candles: Vec<Candle> = (0..20)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user