test: 100% coverage for mfi + psar + cmf + hma + obv (#27)
* test(mfi): cover period accessor, name, flat-TP fallback Codecov flagged 8 lines in indicators/mfi.rs (file at 93.10%): const accessor period (58-60), (0.0, 0.0) arm when tp==prev (85), the Some(50.0) flat-flow fallback (105), and Indicator-impl name body (132-134). Add accessors_and_metadata and flat_typical_prices_default_to_50. mfi.rs now at 116/116. * test(psar): cover warmup/name, drop cold format-arg + panic-only asserts Codecov flagged 8 lines in indicators/psar.rs (file at 95.69%): warmup_period (206-208), name (220-222), the cold format-arg line 254 in pure_uptrend_sar_below_lows, and the in-loop assert! at line 275 in pure_downtrend_sar_above_highs (its panic body is dead). Add accessors_and_metadata for warmup/name. Refactor both trend tests to collect violations into a Vec and assert once outside the loop — the single assert can now legitimately reach its panic body in a regression, while removing the dead cold-path lines from the happy-path coverage. * test(cmf): cover period accessor, name, zero-range branch Codecov flagged 7 lines in indicators/cmf.rs (file at 95.03%): const accessor period (71-73), the range==0.0 zero-MFV branch (84), and Indicator-impl name body (124-126). Add accessors_and_metadata and zero_range_candle_contributes_zero_mfv (flat H=L=close candles). cmf.rs now at 141/141. * test(hma): cover period accessor + name, kill dead naive panic arm Codecov flagged 7 lines in indicators/hma.rs (file at 92.22%): const accessor period (51-53), Indicator-impl name body (87-89), and the unreachable arm at line 167 in matches_independent_wmas. Refactor that test to assert the warmup-shape invariant via assert_eq!(got.is_some(), want.is_some()) + if let, removing the dead panic arm. Add accessors_and_metadata covering period/name. hma.rs now at 90/90. * test(obv): cover value() Some branch + warmup/name metadata Codecov flagged 7 lines in indicators/obv.rs (file at 92.92%): the Some(self.total) branch of value() (47) — only the None branch was hit by reset_clears_state — plus Indicator-impl warmup_period (79-81), name (87-89). Add accessors_and_metadata covering all four. obv.rs now at 99/99.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -214,6 +214,34 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
assert!(matches!(ChaikinMoneyFlow::new(0), Err(Error::PeriodZero)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Cover the const accessor `period` (71-73) and the Indicator-impl
|
||||
/// `name` body (124-126). `warmup_period` is covered elsewhere.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
|
||||
let cmf = ChaikinMoneyFlow::new(20).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(cmf.period(), 20);
|
||||
assert_eq!(cmf.name(), "CMF");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Cover the `range == 0.0` defensive branch (line 84). All other
|
||||
/// tests use H != L candles; feed all-flat candles (H == L) so the
|
||||
/// MFV computation must take the zero-range fallback and emit MFV = 0.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn zero_range_candle_contributes_zero_mfv() {
|
||||
let mut cmf = ChaikinMoneyFlow::new(3).unwrap();
|
||||
let candles: Vec<Candle> = (0..5)
|
||||
.map(|i| Candle::new(10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 5.0, i).unwrap())
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let last = cmf
|
||||
.batch(&candles)
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.flatten()
|
||||
.last()
|
||||
.expect("emits");
|
||||
// Every bar contributed 0 to mfv_sum, so the ratio is 0.
|
||||
assert_eq!(last, 0.0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reset_clears_state() {
|
||||
let candles: Vec<Candle> = (0..20)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -128,6 +128,16 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
assert!(Hma::new(0).is_err());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Cover the const accessor `period` (51-53) and the Indicator-impl
|
||||
/// `name` body (87-89). `warmup_period` is covered by
|
||||
/// `first_emission_matches_warmup_period`.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
|
||||
let hma = Hma::new(9).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(hma.period(), 9);
|
||||
assert_eq!(hma.name(), "HMA");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn first_emission_matches_warmup_period() {
|
||||
let prices: Vec<f64> = (1..=40).map(f64::from).collect();
|
||||
@@ -155,16 +165,16 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let mut half = Wma::new(4).unwrap(); // (9 / 2).max(1)
|
||||
let mut full = Wma::new(9).unwrap();
|
||||
let mut smooth = Wma::new(3).unwrap(); // round(sqrt(9))
|
||||
for &p in &prices {
|
||||
for (i, &p) in prices.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
let got = hma.update(p);
|
||||
let want = match (half.update(p), full.update(p)) {
|
||||
(Some(h), Some(f)) => smooth.update(2.0 * h - f),
|
||||
_ => None,
|
||||
};
|
||||
match (got, want) {
|
||||
(None, None) => {}
|
||||
(Some(a), Some(b)) => assert_relative_eq!(a, b, epsilon = 1e-9),
|
||||
_ => panic!("HMA and the independent-WMA reference disagree on readiness"),
|
||||
// HMA and the independent WMA chain share a warmup formula.
|
||||
assert_eq!(got.is_some(), want.is_some(), "readiness mismatch at {i}");
|
||||
if let (Some(a), Some(b)) = (got, want) {
|
||||
assert_relative_eq!(a, b, epsilon = 1e-9);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -181,6 +181,34 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
assert!(!mfi.is_ready());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Cover the const accessor `period` (58-60) and the Indicator-impl
|
||||
/// `name` body (132-134). `warmup_period` is already covered elsewhere.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
|
||||
let mfi = Mfi::new(14).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(mfi.period(), 14);
|
||||
assert_eq!(mfi.name(), "MFI");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Cover the `tp == prev` arm (line 85) — when typical price equals
|
||||
/// the previous typical price, both flows are 0 — and the all-zero-
|
||||
/// flow fallback `Some(50.0)` (line 105). Existing tests use varying
|
||||
/// candles so the flat-TP arm and the zero-flow fallback never fired.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn flat_typical_prices_default_to_50() {
|
||||
let mut mfi = Mfi::new(3).unwrap();
|
||||
let candles: Vec<Candle> = (0..6)
|
||||
.map(|i| Candle::new(10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 1.0, i).unwrap())
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let last = mfi
|
||||
.batch(&candles)
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.flatten()
|
||||
.last()
|
||||
.expect("emits");
|
||||
assert_eq!(last, 50.0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn rejects_zero_period() {
|
||||
assert!(Mfi::new(0).is_err());
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -99,6 +99,21 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
Candle::new(close, close, close, close, volume, 0).unwrap()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Cover the `value()` Some branch (line 47) and the Indicator-impl
|
||||
/// `warmup_period` (79-81) + `name` (87-89). `reset_clears_state`
|
||||
/// hits only the None branch of `value()`; the metadata methods were
|
||||
/// never queried.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
|
||||
let mut obv = Obv::new();
|
||||
assert_eq!(obv.warmup_period(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(obv.name(), "OBV");
|
||||
assert_eq!(obv.value(), None);
|
||||
obv.update(c(10.0, 100.0));
|
||||
// Baseline 0 — value() Some branch.
|
||||
assert_eq!(obv.value(), Some(0.0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn first_candle_baseline_zero() {
|
||||
let mut obv = Obv::new();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -246,15 +246,21 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let mut psar = Psar::classic();
|
||||
for (i, sar) in psar.batch(&candles).into_iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
if let Some(s) = sar {
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
s <= candles[i].low + 1e-9,
|
||||
"SAR {s} should be <= low {} at i={i}",
|
||||
candles[i].low
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
let violations: Vec<(usize, f64, f64)> = psar
|
||||
.batch(&candles)
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.enumerate()
|
||||
.filter_map(|(i, sar)| {
|
||||
sar.and_then(|s| {
|
||||
if s > candles[i].low + 1e-9 {
|
||||
Some((i, s, candles[i].low))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
assert!(violations.is_empty(), "SAR above low: {violations:?}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
@@ -267,13 +273,23 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let mut psar = Psar::classic();
|
||||
let outs = psar.batch(&candles);
|
||||
// After the trend establishes downward, SAR should sit above highs.
|
||||
for (i, sar) in outs.into_iter().enumerate().skip(5) {
|
||||
if let Some(s) = sar {
|
||||
assert!(s >= candles[i].high - 1e-9);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
let violations: Vec<(usize, f64, f64)> = psar
|
||||
.batch(&candles)
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.enumerate()
|
||||
.skip(5)
|
||||
.filter_map(|(i, sar)| {
|
||||
sar.and_then(|s| {
|
||||
if s < candles[i].high - 1e-9 {
|
||||
Some((i, s, candles[i].high))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
assert!(violations.is_empty(), "SAR below high: {violations:?}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
@@ -292,6 +308,16 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Cover the Indicator-impl `warmup_period` (206-208) and `name`
|
||||
/// (220-222). PSAR's warmup is the constant 2 (seed candle + first
|
||||
/// emitting candle); the name is the literal "PSAR".
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
|
||||
let psar = Psar::classic();
|
||||
assert_eq!(psar.warmup_period(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(psar.name(), "PSAR");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn rejects_invalid_params() {
|
||||
assert!(Psar::new(0.0, 0.02, 0.20).is_err());
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user