mt5-ai-xauusd-trader/docs/status/PROJECT_HEALTH.md

🩺 Technical Project Health Dashboard

This dashboard provides real-time visibility into the technical health, process integrity, and evidence status of the repository.

📊 Quick Status

Metric	Status	Note
CI Success Rate	🟡 AMBER	Fast validation linter check flagged 14 Ruff lint/import-order issues across src/ and tests/.
PR Backlog	🔴 563 Stale	100% of open PRs are stale relative to the latest active commit on main.
Process Integrity	🟢 HEALTHY	Fully linear, intact git history with 1,260+ commits tracing back to root.
Evidence Maturity	🟢 Active Verification	Verified subsystem maturity in Evidence Scorecard.

---

🏗️ Technical Health Details

🧪 CI & Testing

• Status: 🟡 AMBER
• Issue: Global Fast Validation linter check has 14 Ruff linter errors across core models, trading, utilities, and tests following PR #2014 integration.
• Process Integrity Tracking: Detailed invariant and linter drift status logged in Process Integrity Log.

🧹 Code Quality (Ruff)

• Total Errors: 14 (Global check)
• Key Areas:
  • src/models/: RUF022 __all__ sorting in src/models/__init__.py.
  • src/trading/: RUF022 __all__ sorting, unused imports (F401/F811), and import order (I001).
  • src/utils/: Import sorting (I001) and redefinition (F811) in src/utils/synthetic_data.py.
  • tests/: Import sorting (I001) and regex pattern warnings (RUF043).
• Remediation Strategy: Running ruff check --fix . (or individual fixes owned by Jules02) resolves 10 of 14 errors automatically. Developer experience and verification diagnostics remain unblocked.

📜 Process Integrity

• Status: 🟢 HEALTHY
• Resolution of Past Warnings: Programmatic verification of origin/main has confirmed that the repository history is 100% linear, intact, and fully preserved with over 1,260 commits tracing back to the root commit (10e33dfd).
• Shallow Clone Discovery: The continuous claims in previous log entries about "monolithic history grafts" and "ancestry destruction" were identified as false-positive artifacts. These were caused by developer-experience agents operating within isolated sandboxes using shallow clones (depth=1), which report only a single node. No remote history destruction or grafting has ever occurred.
• Current Active State: Linear, unbroken git history is fully preserved, ensuring complete forensic auditiability of all quantitative and trading logic changes.
• Reference: Process Integrity Log

🧱 Technical Debt & Architectural Drift

• Status: 🟡 MANAGED
• Overview: Active technical debt items are tracked and categorized in the Technical Debt Log.
• Key Categories:
  • Quality: Legacy utcnow temporal markers, Ruff linting/upgrade warnings, raw print statement refactoring.
  • Fragmentation: LSTM attention model centralization, RL agent stubs (Dreamer/PPO), reward function shaping.
  • Duplication: Signal direction index mapping harmonization.
• Reference: Technical Debt Log

---

🔍 Evidence Inventory

Evidence Artifact	Category	Status
Enterprise Evidence Scorecard	Compliance	✅ Active
Technical Evidence Index	Navigator	✅ Active
Strategy-to-Code Alignment	Governance	✅ Verified
Performance & Complexity Analysis	Efficiency	✅ Verified
Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)	Architecture	✅ Active
Corrective Action Verification	Audit Trail	✅ Active
Integration Test Results	System Quality	✅ Verified
Walk-Forward Robustness	Strategy Research	✅ Verified
Product Coherence Audit	Quality & Interface	✅ Active
Pre-Production Deployment Gate	Release Readiness	✅ Active
Architecture Quick-Start	System Map	✅ Verified
Technical Debt Log	Quality & Drift	✅ Active
SLO & Reliability Targets	Reliability	✅ Active
Disaster Recovery Plan	Operational Resilience	✅ Active
Operational Runbooks	Incident Response	✅ Active

---

🏛️ Governance Context

This dashboard is maintained by Jules06 (Technical Credibility & Evidence Surface Engine) to provide a transparent view of technical debt and risk for institutional stakeholders.