11 KiB
backtestingfx
A Rust-powered FX backtesting library for Python. Write your strategy in Python, let Rust handle the heavy lifting.
Inspired by backtesting.py but built specifically for forex — lot sizes, pip-based PnL, stop loss, take profit, and realistic account currency conversion.
pip install backtestingfx
Quick Start
import pandas as pd
from backtestingfx import Backtest, Strategy
class MyCrossStrategy(Strategy):
def next(self):
self.close_all()
self.buy(lot_size=0.1)
df = pd.read_csv("EURUSD_1H.csv")
bt = Backtest(df, MyCrossStrategy, cash=10000.0, spread=0.0001)
stats = bt.run()
print(stats)
--- Backtest Results ---
Initial Cash: 10000.00
Final Cash: 9823.50
Total Return: -1.77%
Trades: 248
Win Rate: 52.4%
Avg PnL: -0.71380
Best Trade: 84.20000
Worst Trade: -61.30000
Profit Factor: 0.94
Max Drawdown: 3.21%
Interactive HTML report
Install the optional report dependency and generate a self-contained HTML file:
pip install "backtestingfx[report]"
bt = Backtest(df, MyCrossStrategy, cash=10000.0, spread=0.0001)
stats = bt.run()
bt.plot("strategy-report.html")
The report includes candlesticks, trade entries and exits, equity, drawdown, trade diagnostics, and a complete trade ledger. Plotly is embedded in the file, so the report works offline without a server.
Installation
pip install backtestingfx
Requires Python 3.9+.
Writing a Strategy
Inherit from Strategy and implement next(). It is called once per bar.
from backtestingfx import Backtest, Strategy
class MyStrategy(Strategy):
def init(self):
# called once before the loop starts
# self._bars contains all Bar objects if you need to pre-compute
pass
def next(self):
# self._bar — current bar (open, high, low, close, volume, timestamp)
# self._broker — the broker instance (advanced use)
if self._bar.close > 1.1000:
self.buy(lot_size=0.1, stop_loss=1.0950, take_profit=1.1100)
else:
self.close_all()
Strategy methods
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
self.buy(lot_size, stop_loss=None, take_profit=None) |
Open a long position |
self.sell(lot_size, stop_loss=None, take_profit=None) |
Open a short position |
self.close_all() |
Close all open positions |
self.close_position(id) |
Close a specific position by ID |
self.close_partial(id, lot_size) |
Close part of a position, leaving the rest open |
self.update_sl(id, stop_loss) |
Move a position's stop loss (returns False if the id is gone) |
Trailing stops and scaling out
update_sl moves the stop on an open position in place, so a trailing stop costs
nothing — closing and reopening would pay spread and commission again. close_partial
banks part of a position and leaves the remainder running under the same id, so you can
keep trailing it.
class TrailingBreakout(Strategy):
def next(self):
if not self.positions:
self.buy(1.0, stop_loss=self._bar.close - 0.0050)
return
position = self.positions[0]
# take half off once the trade is 50 pips up
if self._bar.close > position.entry_price + 0.0050 and position.lot_size > 0.5:
self.close_partial(position.id, 0.5)
# trail the stop 50 pips behind price, never backwards
trail = self._bar.close - 0.0050
if position.stop_loss is None or trail > position.stop_loss:
self.update_sl(position.id, trail)
update_sl does not check which way the stop moves — widening a stop is a legitimate
thing to do, so that call is yours to make (the trail > position.stop_loss line above).
close_partial with a size at or above the position just closes it outright, and ignores
zero or negative sizes.
Bar fields
self._bar.open
self._bar.high
self._bar.low
self._bar.close
self._bar.volume
self._bar.timestamp # unix timestamp (int)
Optimization
Grid-search parameters with the simulations running in parallel Rust threads:
import numpy as np
from backtestingfx import Backtest
def sma_cross(df, fast, slow):
fast_sma = df["close"].rolling(fast).mean()
slow_sma = df["close"].rolling(slow).mean()
return np.where(fast_sma > slow_sma, 0.1, 0.0) # target lots per bar
bt = Backtest(df, cash=10_000, commission=3.5)
results = bt.optimize(sma_cross, maximize="total_return_pct",
fast=range(5, 26), slow=range(30, 101, 5))
best_params, best_stats = results[0]
optimize() returns [(params, stats), ...] sorted best-first by the named Stats
field. Re-sort it yourself to minimise something instead.
Why a signal function instead of next()
next() runs in Python, so every bar needs the GIL and threads can't help. A signal
function is called once per parameter combination, not once per bar — it returns the
target lot size for each bar (positive long, negative short, 0.0 flat), and Rust runs
every simulation natively with the GIL released. On a 315-combination grid that is
157x faster than looping Backtest.run() over the same grid.
The trade-off: a signal function can't see the broker, so path-dependent logic (trailing
stops, pyramiding, "exit after N bars") still needs next() and a plain loop. Indicator
warmup must come out as 0.0, not NaN — a NaN signal is rejected rather than
silently treated as "hold".
Backtest Parameters
Backtest(
df, # pandas DataFrame with OHLCV columns
StrategyClass,
cash=10000.0, # starting account balance in USD
commission=0.0, # commission per lot (e.g. 7.0 = $7/lot)
spread=0.0, # full bid–ask width in price units (0.0001 = 1 EURUSD pip)
contract_size=100000.0, # standard FX lot size, don't change this
quote_to_account=1.0, # conversion rate from quote currency to USD
)
Spread and price conventions
OHLC prices are midpoints between bid and ask. spread is the constant full
bid–ask width in absolute price units, not a percentage or a one-sided offset:
- Bid = midpoint − spread / 2; ask = midpoint + spread / 2.
- Longs enter at ask and exit at bid; shorts enter at bid and exit at ask.
- Open-position equity marks longs at bid and shorts at ask. Entry commission is already deducted from cash; future exit commission is excluded until closing.
- Stop-loss and take-profit levels are midpoint levels, triggered by midpoint OHLC highs/lows. Their exits use bid for longs and ask for shorts at that level.
For example, with a flat EURUSD midpoint of 1.1000 and spread=0.0001, bid is
1.09995 and ask is 1.10005. A one-lot long or short loses $10 from spread
on a round trip (0.0001 × 100000), before commission. Its open equity also
reflects that $10 spread cost. For USDJPY, one pip is typically 0.01 price
units; spread inputs use the instrument's price units.
Migration from 0.2.0 and earlier: those versions applied the entire spread
value on each side, charging twice the documented bid–ask width. To preserve
previous entry/exit prices and completed-trade PnL, pass twice your old value
(for example, change 0.0001 to 0.0002). Open equity now includes the exit-side
spread, so historical equity curves and equity-based decisions can still change.
Supply midpoint data: convert bid-only or ask-only data before running a backtest.
Intrabar stop-loss and take-profit policy
OHLC bars do not reveal the order in which prices were visited. If a bar touches both a position's stop-loss and take-profit, the broker deterministically chooses the stop-loss first, for both long and short positions. Exact touches count as hits. This conservative assumption can differ from the outcome on tick data; it does not reconstruct the intrabar price path.
For example, a long entered at midpoint 1.1000, with SL 1.0900 and TP
1.1100, exits at the stop midpoint when the next bar has low 1.0800 and
high 1.1200. Bid/ask spread and exit commission still apply to the fill.
The engine checks existing positions' SL/TP before calling the strategy for
each bar. Orders opened by next() fill at that bar's close; their SL/TP levels
are first checked on the following bar. The entry bar's earlier high/low is not
replayed against the new position. A position opened on the final bar instead
undergoes the usual final liquidation at that bar's close.
Current gap limitation: SL/TP fills use the configured midpoint level, even if the bar opens beyond it. If both levels are touched, stop-first still applies regardless of the open. Such fills may be unattainable after a gap; gap-aware execution is tracked in #8. This policy is fixed, with no configurable intrabar ordering option.
Trading non-USD pairs
By default quote_to_account=1.0 which is correct for USD-quoted pairs (EURUSD, GBPUSD).
For other pairs, pass the rate that converts the quote currency to USD:
| Pair | quote_to_account |
|---|---|
| EURUSD, GBPUSD | 1.0 (default) |
| EURGBP | GBPUSD rate (e.g. 1.27) |
| USDCAD, GBPCAD | CADUSD rate (e.g. 0.74) |
| USDJPY | JPYUSD rate (e.g. 0.0067) |
bt = Backtest(df, MyStrategy, cash=10000.0, spread=0.00015, quote_to_account=1.27)
Stats
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
initial_cash |
Starting balance |
final_cash |
Ending balance |
total_return_pct |
Total return as a percentage |
num_trades |
Number of completed trades |
num_wins |
Number of winning trades |
win_rate_pct |
Win rate as a percentage |
avg_pnl |
Average PnL per trade in USD |
best_trade |
Best single trade PnL in USD |
worst_trade |
Worst single trade PnL in USD |
profit_factor |
Gross profit / gross loss |
max_drawdown_pct |
Maximum drawdown as a percentage |
sharpe_ratio |
Unannualized Sharpe ratio |
equity_curve |
Account equity from initial cash through final liquidation |
trades |
Completed trades with entry, exit, size, direction, and net PnL |
Data Format
Pass a pandas DataFrame with these columns:
open, high, low, close, volume
The index should be a DatetimeIndex, or include a timestamp column. Volume is optional (defaults to 0).
Reusing a native engine
Native Rust Engine::run() and Python Engine.run_native_sma() start each run
with fresh broker state using the current initial cash and cost configuration.
Cash, positions, completed trades, position IDs, and equity history do not carry
between runs. For native strategies with mutable internal state, reset that state
in Strategy::init() or construct a fresh strategy for each run.
Why Rust?
The backtesting engine is written in Rust and compiled as a native Python extension via PyO3. This means the event loop, broker simulation, and stats computation run at native speed while your strategy stays in plain Python.
Contributing and project direction
See CONTRIBUTING.md for local setup, checks, and examples, COMPATIBILITY.md for API and platform expectations, and ROADMAP.md for the FX scope and prioritized backlog. Use the GitHub issue templates for bug reports and feature proposals.
License
MIT — see LICENSE