mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-08-17 10:08:05 +00:00
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: aider (openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4) <aider@aider.chat> Co-authored-by: Warp <agent@warp.dev>
128 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
128 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
# ZLEMA: Zero-Lag Exponential Moving Average
|
|
|
|
## EMA with lag compensation via a zero-lag signal
|
|
|
|
> "ZLEMA does not erase lag. It predicts just enough to act early, then pays the price in overshoot."
|
|
|
|
ZLEMA takes a standard EMA and feeds it a **zero-lag signal**: current price minus a lagged price. This produces a smoother that responds faster than EMA without going fully raw. It is not magic. It shifts some lag into controlled overshoot.
|
|
|
|
## Historical Context
|
|
|
|
ZLEMA is a widely used variation on EMA intended to reduce delay without abandoning exponential smoothing. It appears in multiple technical analysis toolkits and is often described as a "predictive EMA." The prediction is simple: extrapolate the current price by subtracting a lagged value.
|
|
|
|
## Architecture & Physics
|
|
|
|
### Pipeline
|
|
|
|
1. **Lag estimate**
|
|
|
|
$$\text{lag} = \max(1, \text{round}((N-1)/2))$$
|
|
|
|
2. **Zero-lag signal**
|
|
|
|
$$s_t = 2 \cdot x_t - x_{t-\text{lag}}$$
|
|
|
|
3. **EMA smoothing**
|
|
|
|
$$\text{ZLEMA}_t = \text{EMA}(s_t, \alpha)$$
|
|
|
|
### Warmup compensation
|
|
|
|
ZLEMA uses EMA bias compensation during warmup:
|
|
|
|
$$y_t^{*} = \frac{y_t}{1 - (1 - \alpha)^t}$$
|
|
|
|
This avoids the early-stage bias toward zero and makes the first values usable.
|
|
|
|
## Math Foundation
|
|
|
|
**EMA update:**
|
|
|
|
$$y_t = y_{t-1} + \alpha (s_t - y_{t-1})$$
|
|
|
|
**Zero-lag signal:**
|
|
|
|
$$s_t = 2 \cdot x_t - x_{t-\text{lag}}$$
|
|
|
|
**Alpha from period:**
|
|
|
|
$$\alpha = \frac{2}{N + 1}$$
|
|
|
|
## Performance Profile
|
|
|
|
### Operation Count (Streaming Mode, Scalar)
|
|
|
|
**Hot path (after warmup, compensation complete):**
|
|
|
|
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|
|
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
|
|
| FMA | 2 | 4 | 8 |
|
|
| MUL | 1 | 3 | 3 |
|
|
| **Total** | **3** | | **~11 cycles** |
|
|
|
|
The hot path consists of:
|
|
1. Zero-lag signal: `FMA(2.0, val, -lagged)` 1 FMA
|
|
2. EMA core: `FMA(zlemaRaw, beta, alpha * signal)` 1 FMA + 1 MUL
|
|
|
|
**Warmup path (with bias compensation):**
|
|
|
|
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|
|
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
|
|
| FMA | 2 | 4 | 8 |
|
|
| MUL | 2 | 3 | 6 |
|
|
| DIV | 1 | 15 | 15 |
|
|
| CMP | 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
| **Total** | **7** | | **~31 cycles** |
|
|
|
|
Additional warmup operations:
|
|
- Decay tracking: `e *= beta` 1 MUL
|
|
- Bias compensation: `zlemaRaw / (1 - e)` 1 DIV
|
|
- Hot/compensated checks 2 CMP
|
|
|
|
### Batch Mode (SIMD Analysis)
|
|
|
|
ZLEMA is an IIR filter with lag buffer dependency not directly vectorizable across bars. However, within-bar operations use FMA intrinsics.
|
|
|
|
| Optimization | Benefit |
|
|
| :--- | :--- |
|
|
| FMA instructions | ~11 cycles vs ~14 scalar |
|
|
| stackalloc buffer | Zero heap allocation for lag d256 |
|
|
|
|
### Quality Metrics
|
|
|
|
| Metric | Score | Notes |
|
|
| :--- | :---: | :--- |
|
|
| **Accuracy** | 8/10 | Matches PineScript reference |
|
|
| **Timeliness** | 8/10 | Faster response than EMA |
|
|
| **Overshoot** | 6/10 | Predictive signal causes overshoot on reversals |
|
|
| **Smoothness** | 7/10 | Between EMA and raw price |
|
|
|
|
## Validation
|
|
|
|
ZLEMA is validated against a PineScript reference implementation.
|
|
|
|
| Library | Status | Tolerance | Notes |
|
|
|:---|:---|:---|:---|
|
|
| **TA-Lib** | N/A | - | No ZLEMA in TA-Lib |
|
|
| **Skender** | N/A | - | No ZLEMA in Skender |
|
|
| **Tulip** | Partial | - | Tulip has `zlema` but not used here |
|
|
| **Ooples** | N/A | - | No ZLEMA in Ooples |
|
|
| **PineScript** | ? Passed | 1e-10 | Matches `lib/trends_IIR/zlema/zlema.pine` |
|
|
|
|
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
|
|
1. **Overshoot on turns**
|
|
|
|
The zero-lag signal is a forward estimate. It can overshoot when price reverses sharply. This is expected behavior.
|
|
|
|
2. **Period semantics**
|
|
|
|
ZLEMA uses EMA alpha; the lag term is derived from period but not equivalent to a window length. Do not compare ZLEMA period directly to SMA window length.
|
|
|
|
3. **Warmup discipline**
|
|
|
|
Use `IsHot` / `WarmupPeriod` before acting on signals. Early values are bias-corrected but still unstable.
|
|
|
|
4. **Non-finite data**
|
|
|
|
NaN or Infinity is replaced with the last valid value. Before the first valid sample, output is `NaN`. |