mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-08-17 10:08:05 +00:00
- Introduced YZV class for calculating Yang-Zhang Volatility, a comprehensive volatility measure that incorporates overnight, open-to-close, and high-low components. - Implemented calculation methods, including batch processing for TBarSeries and spans. - Added documentation for YZV, detailing its mathematical foundation, performance profile, and trading applications. - Updated volume index documentation to reflect changes in file paths. - Refactored VWMA calculation method to use a more generic source parameter instead of price.
149 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
149 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
# ZLDEMA: Zero-Lag Double Exponential Moving Average
|
|
|
|
## DEMA with lag compensation via a zero-lag signal
|
|
|
|
> "ZLDEMA combines the speed of zero-lag prediction with the smoothness of double exponential averaging. You get faster response than ZLEMA, with better trend-following than DEMA."
|
|
|
|
ZLDEMA takes a standard DEMA and feeds it a **zero-lag signal**: current price minus a lagged price. This produces a smoother that responds faster than DEMA without going fully raw. The dual EMA cascade provides additional noise rejection while the zero-lag preprocessing maintains responsiveness.
|
|
|
|
## Historical Context
|
|
|
|
ZLDEMA extends the zero-lag concept from ZLEMA to double exponential moving averages. Where ZLEMA applies lag compensation to a single EMA, ZLDEMA applies it to a two-stage EMA cascade using the DEMA formula (2*EMA1 - EMA2). This combination targets the middle ground between ZLEMA's speed and TEMA's smoothness.
|
|
|
|
## Architecture & Physics
|
|
|
|
### Pipeline
|
|
|
|
1. **Lag estimate**
|
|
|
|
$$\text{lag} = \max(1, \text{round}((N-1)/2))$$
|
|
|
|
2. **Zero-lag signal**
|
|
|
|
$$s_t = 2 \cdot x_t - x_{t-\text{lag}}$$
|
|
|
|
3. **First EMA stage**
|
|
|
|
$$\text{EMA1}_t = \text{EMA}(s_t, \alpha)$$
|
|
|
|
4. **Second EMA stage**
|
|
|
|
$$\text{EMA2}_t = \text{EMA}(\text{EMA1}_t, \alpha)$$
|
|
|
|
5. **DEMA output**
|
|
|
|
$$\text{ZLDEMA}_t = 2 \cdot \text{EMA1}_t - \text{EMA2}_t$$
|
|
|
|
### Warmup compensation
|
|
|
|
ZLDEMA uses EMA bias compensation during warmup on both EMA stages:
|
|
|
|
$$y_t^{*} = \frac{y_t}{1 - (1 - \alpha)^t}$$
|
|
|
|
This avoids the early-stage bias toward zero and makes the first values usable.
|
|
|
|
## Math Foundation
|
|
|
|
**EMA update:**
|
|
|
|
$$y_t = y_{t-1} + \alpha (s_t - y_{t-1})$$
|
|
|
|
**Zero-lag signal:**
|
|
|
|
$$s_t = 2 \cdot x_t - x_{t-\text{lag}}$$
|
|
|
|
**DEMA formula:**
|
|
|
|
$$\text{DEMA}_t = 2 \cdot \text{EMA1}_t - \text{EMA2}_t$$
|
|
|
|
**Alpha from period:**
|
|
|
|
$$\alpha = \frac{2}{N + 1}$$
|
|
|
|
## Performance Profile
|
|
|
|
### Operation Count (Streaming Mode, Scalar)
|
|
|
|
**Hot path (after warmup, compensation complete):**
|
|
|
|
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|
|
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
|
|
| FMA | 4 | 4 | 16 |
|
|
| MUL | 2 | 3 | 6 |
|
|
| **Total** | **6** | | **~22 cycles** |
|
|
|
|
The hot path consists of:
|
|
|
|
1. Zero-lag signal: `FMA(2.0, val, -lagged)` - 1 FMA
|
|
2. EMA1 core: `FMA(ema1Raw, beta, alpha * signal)` - 1 FMA + 1 MUL
|
|
3. EMA2 core: `FMA(ema2Raw, beta, alpha * ema1)` - 1 FMA + 1 MUL
|
|
4. DEMA output: `FMA(2.0, ema1, -ema2)` - 1 FMA
|
|
|
|
**Warmup path (with bias compensation):**
|
|
|
|
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|
|
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
|
|
| FMA | 4 | 4 | 16 |
|
|
| MUL | 4 | 3 | 12 |
|
|
| DIV | 1 | 15 | 15 |
|
|
| CMP | 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
| **Total** | **11** | | **~45 cycles** |
|
|
|
|
Additional warmup operations:
|
|
|
|
- Decay tracking: `e *= beta` - 1 MUL
|
|
- Compensator calc: `1 / (1 - e)` - 1 DIV
|
|
- Bias compensation: `ema1Raw * compensator`, `ema2Raw * compensator` - 2 MUL
|
|
- Hot/compensated checks - 2 CMP
|
|
|
|
### Batch Mode (SIMD Analysis)
|
|
|
|
ZLDEMA is an IIR filter with lag buffer dependency - not directly vectorizable across bars. However, within-bar operations use FMA intrinsics.
|
|
|
|
| Optimization | Benefit |
|
|
| :--- | :--- |
|
|
| FMA instructions | ~22 cycles vs ~28 scalar |
|
|
| stackalloc buffer | Zero heap allocation for lag ≤256 |
|
|
|
|
### Quality Metrics
|
|
|
|
| Metric | Score | Notes |
|
|
| :--- | :---: | :--- |
|
|
| **Accuracy** | 8/10 | Matches PineScript reference |
|
|
| **Timeliness** | 9/10 | Faster response than DEMA, comparable to ZLEMA |
|
|
| **Overshoot** | 5/10 | Predictive signal plus DEMA amplification causes overshoot |
|
|
| **Smoothness** | 7/10 | Smoother than ZLEMA due to dual EMA cascade |
|
|
|
|
## Validation
|
|
|
|
ZLDEMA is validated against a PineScript reference implementation.
|
|
|
|
| Library | Status | Tolerance | Notes |
|
|
|:---|:---|:---|:---|
|
|
| **TA-Lib** | N/A | - | No ZLDEMA in TA-Lib |
|
|
| **Skender** | N/A | - | No ZLDEMA in Skender |
|
|
| **Tulip** | N/A | - | No ZLDEMA in Tulip |
|
|
| **Ooples** | N/A | - | No ZLDEMA in Ooples |
|
|
| **PineScript** | ✓ Passed | 1e-10 | Matches `lib/trends_IIR/zldema/zldema.pine` |
|
|
|
|
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
|
|
1. **Increased overshoot on turns**
|
|
|
|
The zero-lag signal is a forward estimate, and the DEMA formula (2*EMA1 - EMA2) further amplifies deviations. Expect more overshoot than ZLEMA when price reverses sharply.
|
|
|
|
2. **Period semantics**
|
|
|
|
ZLDEMA uses EMA alpha; the lag term is derived from period but not equivalent to a window length. Do not compare ZLDEMA period directly to SMA window length.
|
|
|
|
3. **Warmup discipline**
|
|
|
|
Use `IsHot` / `WarmupPeriod` before acting on signals. Early values are bias-corrected but still unstable. The dual EMA cascade requires longer warmup than single-stage ZLEMA.
|
|
|
|
4. **Non-finite data**
|
|
|
|
NaN or Infinity is replaced with the last valid value. Before the first valid sample, output is `NaN`.
|
|
|
|
5. **DEMA vs ZLDEMA**
|
|
|
|
ZLDEMA is not simply DEMA with a different alpha. The zero-lag preprocessing fundamentally changes the input signal, making ZLDEMA more responsive but also more prone to overshoot than standard DEMA. |