mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-08-15 17:18:05 +00:00
129 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
129 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
# SINEMA: Sine-Weighted Moving Average
|
|
|
|
> *Nature doesn't do straight lines, and neither should your weights.*
|
|
|
|
| Property | Value |
|
|
| ---------------- | -------------------------------- |
|
|
| **Category** | Trend (FIR MA) |
|
|
| **Inputs** | Source (close) |
|
|
| **Parameters** | `period` |
|
|
| **Outputs** | Single series (Sinema) |
|
|
| **Output range** | Tracks input |
|
|
| **Warmup** | `period` bars |
|
|
| **PineScript** | [sinema.pine](sinema.pine) |
|
|
| **Signature** | [sinema_signature](sinema_signature.md) |
|
|
|
|
- The Sine-Weighted Moving Average (SINEMA) applies sine-wave weighting to data points within the lookback window.
|
|
- **Similar:** [ALMA](../alma/alma.md), [BLMA](../blma/blma.md) | **Complementary:** Cycle indicators | **Trading note:** Sine-weighted MA; half-sine kernel for naturally smooth bell-shaped weights.
|
|
- Validated against TA-Lib, Skender, and Tulip reference implementations where available.
|
|
|
|
The Sine-Weighted Moving Average (SINEMA) applies sine-wave weighting to data points within the lookback window. Weights follow the formula $w_i = \sin(\pi \cdot (i+1) / N)$, creating a smooth bell-shaped distribution that emphasizes middle values while gracefully tapering at the edges. Unlike SMA's uniform weighting or WMA's linear ramp, sine weighting provides a natural transition that reduces high-frequency noise while preserving mid-frequency trends.
|
|
|
|
## Historical Context
|
|
|
|
Sine-weighted smoothing emerges from signal processing, where windowing functions shape the frequency response of filters. The sine window (also called the cosine window when phase-shifted) is a member of the generalized cosine window family. Its application to financial moving averages provides a middle ground between the harsh cutoff of rectangular windows (SMA) and the aggressive center-weighting of triangular windows (TRIMA).
|
|
|
|
## Architecture & Physics
|
|
|
|
### 1. Weight Calculation
|
|
|
|
For a period $N$, the weight at position $i$ (0-indexed) is:
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
w_i = \sin\left(\frac{\pi \cdot (i+1)}{N}\right)
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
This produces a half-sine wave: weights start small, peak at the center, and taper back down. For period 5: weights ≈ [0.588, 0.951, 1.0, 0.951, 0.588].
|
|
|
|
### 2. Normalization
|
|
|
|
The weighted average normalizes by the sum of weights:
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
\text{SINEMA}_t = \frac{\sum_{i=0}^{N-1} P_{t-i} \cdot w_i}{\sum_{i=0}^{N-1} w_i}
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
### 3. Warmup Adaptation
|
|
|
|
During warmup (fewer than $N$ values), weights are recalculated for the current buffer size $k$:
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
w_i^{(k)} = \sin\left(\frac{\pi \cdot (i+1)}{k}\right)
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
This ensures smooth output from the first bar rather than waiting for a full window.
|
|
|
|
## Mathematical Foundation
|
|
|
|
### Weight Distribution
|
|
|
|
The sine weight function produces:
|
|
- **Symmetric weighting**: Equal emphasis on equidistant past values
|
|
- **Smooth edges**: No abrupt transitions at window boundaries
|
|
- **Peak at center**: Maximum weight at position $\lfloor N/2 \rfloor$
|
|
|
|
### Frequency Response
|
|
|
|
As an FIR filter, SINEMA has linear phase response (no phase distortion) but $O(N)$ complexity per bar in streaming mode. The sine window provides moderate side-lobe suppression (~23 dB), better than rectangular (SMA) but less than Hamming or Blackman windows.
|
|
|
|
## Performance Profile
|
|
|
|
### Operation Count (Streaming Mode, Scalar)
|
|
|
|
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|
|
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
|
|
| ADD | N | 1 | N |
|
|
| MUL | N | 3 | 3N |
|
|
| DIV | 1 | 15 | 15 |
|
|
| **Total** | **2N+1** | — | **~4N+15 cycles** |
|
|
|
|
Pre-calculated weights eliminate `sin()` calls in steady state.
|
|
|
|
### Batch Mode (SIMD)
|
|
|
|
The batch calculation uses `stackalloc` for buffers ≤256 elements and `ArrayPool` for larger periods. SIMD vectorization is limited due to the weighted sum's data dependency, but memory locality is optimized.
|
|
|
|
### Quality Metrics
|
|
|
|
| Metric | Score | Notes |
|
|
| :--- | :---: | :--- |
|
|
| **Accuracy** | 10/10 | Exact weighted mean calculation |
|
|
| **Timeliness** | 4/10 | Moderate lag (~N/3 due to center weighting) |
|
|
| **Overshoot** | 0/10 | Never exceeds input data range |
|
|
| **Smoothness** | 7/10 | Smoother than SMA; less prone to drop-off jumps |
|
|
|
|
## Validation
|
|
|
|
SINEMA is not implemented in standard technical analysis libraries.
|
|
|
|
| Library | Status | Notes |
|
|
| :--- | :---: | :--- |
|
|
| **TA-Lib** | N/A | Not implemented |
|
|
| **Skender** | N/A | Not implemented |
|
|
| **Tulip** | N/A | Not implemented |
|
|
| **Ooples** | N/A | Not implemented |
|
|
| **PineScript** | ✅ | Reference implementation matches |
|
|
|
|
Validation tests verify:
|
|
- Sine weight mathematical correctness
|
|
- Constant input produces constant output
|
|
- Batch/Streaming/Span mode consistency
|
|
- Output bounded by input range
|
|
- Warmup weight adaptation
|
|
|
|
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
|
|
1. **O(N) Complexity**: Unlike SMA's O(1) running sum, SINEMA requires O(N) operations per bar. For very long periods (>500), consider whether the smoothness benefits justify the cost.
|
|
|
|
2. **Warmup Behavior**: The adaptive warmup recalculates weights for partial buffers. This produces valid output from bar 1 but with different effective weighting than steady state.
|
|
|
|
3. **Weight Pre-calculation**: Weights are computed once at construction. Changing the period requires a new indicator instance.
|
|
|
|
4. **NaN Propagation**: A single NaN in the window corrupts the result. QuanTAlib substitutes the last valid value to prevent this.
|
|
|
|
5. **Memory**: Each instance stores a pre-calculated weight array of size $N$. For many concurrent indicators with large periods, memory adds up.
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
|
|
- Harris, F. J. (1978). "On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform." *Proceedings of the IEEE*, 66(1), 51-83.
|
|
- Oppenheim, A. V., & Schafer, R. W. (2010). *Discrete-Time Signal Processing* (3rd ed.). Pearson. |