mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-08-18 18:48:05 +00:00
Miha Kralj
a7b7207801
- Updated mathematical foundations and performance profiles where necessary to maintain clarity and coherence.
57 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
57 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
# DEMA: Double Exponential Moving Average
|
|
|
|
> "EMA is good. DEMA is better. It's like an EMA that drank a double espresso and stopped lagging behind the conversation."
|
|
|
|
DEMA (Double Exponential Moving Average) is not just "two EMAs." It's a clever mathematical hack to cancel out the lag inherent in a standard EMA. By subtracting the "error" (the difference between a single EMA and a double EMA) from the original EMA, DEMA produces a curve that hugs the price action much tighter.
|
|
|
|
## Historical Context
|
|
|
|
Introduced by Patrick Mulloy in the January 1994 issue of *Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities*, DEMA was designed to reduce the lag of trend-following indicators. Mulloy realized that smoothing always introduces lag, but by combining single and double smoothing, you could mathematically negate some of that delay.
|
|
|
|
## Architecture & Physics
|
|
|
|
DEMA is a composite indicator built from two EMAs.
|
|
|
|
1. **EMA1**: The standard EMA of the price.
|
|
2. **EMA2**: The EMA of EMA1.
|
|
|
|
The "physics" relies on the fact that EMA2 lags EMA1 roughly as much as EMA1 lags the price. Therefore, $2 \times \text{EMA1} - \text{EMA2}$ pushes the value forward, correcting the lag.
|
|
|
|
## Mathematical Foundation
|
|
|
|
$$ \text{EMA}_1 = \text{EMA}(P, N) $$
|
|
|
|
$$ \text{EMA}_2 = \text{EMA}(\text{EMA}_1, N) $$
|
|
|
|
$$ \text{DEMA} = 2 \times \text{EMA}_1 - \text{EMA}_2 $$
|
|
|
|
Where $N$ is the period.
|
|
|
|
## Performance Profile
|
|
|
|
DEMA is extremely fast, requiring only a few floating-point operations per update.
|
|
|
|
| Metric | Complexity | Notes |
|
|
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
|
| **Throughput** | Extreme | 2x EMA cost (still O(1)) |
|
|
| **Complexity** | O(1) | Recursive calculation |
|
|
| **Accuracy** | 7/10 | Good for trends, but can be erratic |
|
|
| **Timeliness** | 9/10 | Very fast, minimal lag |
|
|
| **Overshoot** | 4/10 | Prone to overshoot on reversals |
|
|
| **Smoothness** | 5/10 | Can be jagged due to speed |
|
|
|
|
## Validation
|
|
|
|
Validated against TA-Lib and Skender.Stock.Indicators.
|
|
|
|
| Provider | Error Tolerance | Notes |
|
|
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
|
| **TA-Lib** | $10^{-9}$ | Matches `TA_DEMA` |
|
|
| **Skender** | $10^{-9}$ | Matches `GetDema` |
|
|
|
|
### Common Pitfalls
|
|
|
|
1. **Overshoot**: Because DEMA subtracts lag, it can sometimes overshoot price turns. It's more volatile than a standard EMA.
|
|
2. **"Double" Misconception**: It is *not* a moving average of a moving average (that would be slower). It is a lag-corrected composite.
|
|
3. **Warmup**: DEMA needs about $2 \times N$ bars to converge fully, as the second EMA needs the first EMA to stabilize.
|