# ── POST-MORTEM (2026-07-19): EXPERIMENT CLOSED — HYPOTHESIS REFUTED ── Killed by the pre-registered criterion, decisively: 994 resolved tickets, **1W / 993L, 0.075x realized multiple** (paper bank $1,000 spent; 32 tickets / ~$32 still open at shutdown — even if ALL win, the multiple caps ~0.1x). The v0 sub-2¢ mix AND the v0.1 1-2c band both failed live-paper despite the cache showing 1.24-1.28x historically. Expected wins at the historical rate: ~12; observed: 1 (p ≈ 0 — not variance). VERDICT: today's sub-2¢ asks are near-perfectly informed. The 2025-era calibration edge no longer exists in the current market — the visible cheap tail is pure adverse selection now. The honest FAK fill model + $1 stakes made this a ~$1,000-paper-dollar lesson instead of a real one; the fill model, chain settles, and silo pattern all worked exactly as designed and are reusable for the next hypothesis (tape-derived flow signals). Fly app destroyed 2026-07-19; feed/state/dashboard remain as the record. # VALUE — undervalued-market bot (silo'd from the copy trader) Status: RESEARCH + PLAN (2026-07-17). No bot code yet. USER directives: copy-bot playbook (paper first → real money), paper must mimic reality as closely as possible, and a HARD SILO — nothing here may touch or impact the copy trader. Own dashboard page eventually (jaxperro.com/value). ## Phase-1 research findings (calibration study, 2026-07-17) Data: 13.5M TRUSTED resolved bet rows (trust.py CTE — the res_t=ts poison and stale marks excluded), 26.2M raw, read-only against live/cache.duckdb. 1. **The market is well-calibrated where the copybot lives.** 60¢–98¢ realized-vs-price gaps are ±0.3% and NEGATIVE net of the 4% fee model. There is NO simple "buy favorites" edge. (Also independently validates the copybot's price band: no systematic juice was left on the table.) 2. **Longshots 2¢–60¢ are systematically OVERPRICED** (gap −1.7% to −3.5%, cluster-conservative z −9 to −42). Blanket longshot buying is a donation. 3. **THE ANOMALY: sub-2¢ contracts are UNDERPRICED.** - Full set: n=696k bets / 291k markets, avg entry 0.82¢, realized 1.02% → 1.24x gross, ≈ +20%/$ net of entry fee, z≈+12 (market-clustered). - Survives WITHOUT our skilled wallets: rows from wallets outside the 94-wallet skilled pool, on market-sides NO skilled wallet touched: 1.27x, +23%/$ net (n=648k / 286k markets). - NOT refunds: on the payout-covered subset only 41/153k rows were 50/50 refunds (each does mark won=TRUE — the boolean lies exactly as feared, but the frequency is negligible). Refund-aware TRUE EV on that subset: entry 0.85¢ → EV 1.31¢/share = 1.55x gross, ~+50%/$ net. Covered subset skews rich (it's markets our pipeline settled); the honest global estimate stays ~1.24–1.27x. - Horizon: the effect is strongest at SHORT time-to-resolution (<1h and 1h–1d), i.e. in-play/near-expiry dust. - Skilled wallets at sub-2¢ run 2.85x (n=5.5k) — the informed-niche effect on top of the structural one; that part is signal A's business (smart-money scanner), not this bot's. **Interpretation**: below ~2¢ the favorite-longshot bias INVERTS — consistent with sellers harvesting "sure" pennies (selling 99¢ completes = supplying the 1¢ side) pushing tails below fair. Per-bet payoff is 50–120x with ~1% hit rate: massive variance, only harvestable as a LAW-OF-LARGE-NUMBERS portfolio (hundreds of independent markets), tiny per-market stakes. **What the data CANNOT tell us (= why the paper bot exists):** - EXECUTABILITY: cached fills are prices people actually got, but dust books are thin (our own depth gate: ask5c<$50 = "mispriced every fill"). Whether $1–5/market is fillable at ≤2¢ TODAY, at FAK, without moving the book, is unknowable from history. This is the #1 risk and the paper bot's #1 job. - Era drift: the cache spans months; the bias may have closed. - Correlation: same-event dust tickets resolve together (event cap needed). ## Strategy V0 (paper only): systematic sub-2¢ portfolio - Universe: every active market with an ask ≤ 2¢ (gamma/CLOB scan; exclude markets resolving $50/week at $1–2 stakes (too thin to matter). 3. REAL MONEY: only after paper verdict + user go; separate wallet, separate caps conversation. Never funded from or through the copy-trader wallet. ## Open research (phase 2, before/alongside paper build) - Maker-vs-taker split: can resting 1¢ bids harvest the same edge with NEGATIVE fee (maker) instead of paying the taker rate? Adverse-selection test needed (the copybot's resting-limit analysis says beware). - Era stability: recompute the bucket table on trailing 30/60/90d windows. - Category cut once slugs are joined (slug_cache/gamma) — is it all esports comebacks, or broad?