Files
wickra/docs/wiki/Warmup-Periods.md
T
kingchenc 278b6afaa4 E4: commit the documentation sources
The 33 Markdown files under docs/wiki/ were never tracked. Commit them
into the repository so the documentation is versioned alongside the
code: 8 top-level pages plus 25 per-indicator deep dives under
indicators/{momentum,trend,volatility,volume}/.

The pages are kept in-repo (not pushed to a flat GitHub Wiki), so the
relative indicators/<family>/... links in Home.md resolve correctly
when rendered on GitHub.
2026-05-22 16:18:04 +02:00

8.7 KiB
Raw Blame History

Warmup Periods

Every Wickra indicator returns None (Rust), None (Python), or null (Node) for its first few inputs while it gathers enough data to produce a defined value. The number of inputs an indicator needs before it emits its first non-empty value is its warmup period, surfaced everywhere as warmup_period() / warmupPeriod().

After the first emission, the indicator never goes back to a "no value yet" state — it has rolled its state forward and will produce a steady value on every subsequent update(). Calling reset() returns to the warming-up state, equivalent to a freshly constructed instance.

How to read the formula column

The formulas below are taken verbatim from the warmup_period() methods in crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/<name>.rs. The "Inputs at first emission" column says, in 1-indexed terms, which update() call returns the first Some/non-NaN value. They are the same number; "first emission index" in 0-indexed terms is warmup_period 1.

Single-output indicators

Indicator Constructor Formula warmup_period() for shown args Inputs at first emission
Sma Sma::new(14) period 14 14th
Ema Ema::new(14) period 14 14th
Wma Wma::new(14) period 14 14th
Dema Dema::new(14) 2 * period - 1 27 27th
Tema Tema::new(14) 3 * period - 2 40 40th
Hma Hma::new(14) period + round(sqrt(period)).max(1) - 1 17 17th
Kama Kama::new(10, 2, 30) er_period + 1 11 11th
Rsi Rsi::new(14) period + 1 15 15th
Cci Cci::new(20) period 20 20th
Roc Roc::new(12) period + 1 13 13th
WilliamsR WilliamsR::new(14) period 14 14th
Mfi Mfi::new(14) period 14 14th
Trix Trix::new(15) 3 * period - 1 44 44th
AwesomeOscillator AwesomeOscillator::new(5, 34) slow_period 34 34th
Atr Atr::new(14) period 14 14th
Psar Psar::new(0.02, 0.20) constant 2 2 2nd
Obv Obv::new() constant 1 1 1st
Vwap Vwap::new() constant 1 1 1st
RollingVwap RollingVwap::new(20) period 20 20th

Multi-output indicators

These indicators emit several values at once (a struct in Rust, a tuple in Python, an object in Node) and every column / field transitions from "not ready" to "ready" together — there are no rows that have a signal but no macd, for example.

Indicator Constructor Formula warmup_period() for shown args Inputs at first emission Outputs
MacdIndicator MacdIndicator::new(12, 26, 9) slow + signal - 1 34 34th macd, signal, histogram
BollingerBands BollingerBands::new(20, 2.0) period 20 20th upper, middle, lower, stddev
Stochastic Stochastic::new(14, 3) k_period + d_period - 1 16 16th k, d
Adx Adx::new(14) 2 * period 28 28th plus_di, minus_di, adx
Aroon Aroon::new(14) period + 1 15 15th up, down
Keltner Keltner::new(20, 10, 2.0) ema_period.max(atr_period) 20 20th upper, middle, lower
Donchian Donchian::new(20) period 20 20th upper, middle, lower

"Off-by-one" cases worth memorising

A few indicators look like they should warm up at period but in fact need period + 1 inputs. The reason is always the same — they consume diffs or previous-close differences, not the prices themselves, and the very first input has nothing to diff against.

  • Rsi::new(period) warmup is period + 1. RSI is based on Wilder's smoothing over per-tick gains and losses. With 14 prices you only have 13 diffs; you need 15 prices to compute 14 diffs and seed avg_gain / avg_loss. The Rust unit test that pins this is warmup_period_is_period_plus_one:
    let rsi = Rsi::new(14).unwrap();
    assert_eq!(rsi.warmup_period(), 15);
    
  • Roc::new(period) warmup is period + 1. ROC compares the current price to the price period bars ago; that comparison only makes sense starting at input period + 1.
  • Aroon::new(period) warmup is period + 1. Aroon scans a period + 1-bar window to find the bars-since-high and bars-since-low.
  • Kama::new(er_period, ...) warmup is er_period + 1. Kaufman's efficiency ratio needs er_period differences, which costs one extra bar.

Cross-checking from your own code

The cleanest way to verify any of these from your application code is the indicator's own warmup_period():

use wickra::{Indicator, MacdIndicator};
let macd = MacdIndicator::classic();   // (12, 26, 9)
assert_eq!(macd.warmup_period(), 34);
import wickra as ta
assert ta.MACD(12, 26, 9).warmup_period() == 34
const wickra = require('wickra');
const sma = new wickra.SMA(20);
console.log(sma.warmupPeriod());   // -> 20

(Note: as of wickra@0.1.4, warmupPeriod() is exposed on the Node single-output classes but not on every multi-output class — consult bindings/node/index.d.ts for the authoritative surface.)

See also