The README and Streaming-vs-Batch benchmark tables were a stale snapshot
("5 000-bar series", numbers from an older machine). Re-run
`python -m benchmarks.compare_libraries` on the current hardware against
the same peer set (finta + talipp; TA-Lib and pandas-ta stay excluded on
Windows) and replace the tables with the fresh numbers.
The new run uses the script's current defaults: a 20 000-bar batch series
and a 5 000-bar seed + 15 000-bar live streaming workload — both more
representative of real backtests than the previous 5 000 / 2 000-bar
sizes. Wickra still wins every batch row outright (3.5× to 1 244× faster
than the nearest peer) and the streaming RSI is ~13.8× faster than
talipp's incremental implementation.
kingchenc
a707eb5d62