test: 100% coverage for pmo + ppo + roc + ulcer_index + williams_r (#21)

* test(pmo): cover periods/value accessors, name, zero-prev fallback

Codecov flagged 10 lines in crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/pmo.rs
(file at 90.56%):

  - const accessors periods (76-78), value (81-83) — never queried
  - line 103 (`0.0` in the prev == 0.0 ROC fallback) — every existing
    test used prices > 0, so the divide-by-zero guard never fired
  - Indicator-impl name body (130-132) — never queried

Add accessors_and_metadata covering periods/value/name. Add
zero_previous_price_treats_roc_as_flat seeding prev_price = 0 then
pushing a non-zero price — the ROC must take the flat-momentum
fallback (0.0) and the doubly-smoothed PMO emits exactly 0.0
rather than NaN.

pmo.rs is now at 106/106 lines, no behavioural change.

* test(ppo): cover periods/value accessors, name, zero-slow-EMA fallback

Codecov flagged 10 lines in crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/ppo.rs
(file at 90.29%):

  - const accessors periods (71-73), value (76-78) — never queried
  - line 96 (`0.0` in the s == 0.0 PPO fallback) — every existing test
    used prices ≈ 100, so the slow EMA was never 0 and the
    divide-by-zero guard never fired
  - Indicator-impl name body (122-124) — never queried

Add accessors_and_metadata covering periods/value/name. Add
zero_slow_ema_yields_zero_ppo feeding a stream of zeros — both EMAs
converge to 0.0 and the indicator must emit exactly 0.0 (flat
momentum) rather than NaN.

ppo.rs is now at 103/103 lines, no behavioural change.

* test(roc): cover period accessor, warmup/name, zero-prev fallback

Codecov flagged 10 lines in crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/roc.rs
(file at 87.80%):

  - const accessor period (47-49) — never queried
  - line 70 (`0.0` in the prev == 0.0 ROC fallback) — every test used
    prices ≥ 1.0, so the divide-by-zero guard never fired
  - Indicator-impl warmup_period (83-85), name (91-93) — never queried

Add accessors_and_metadata covering period == 5, warmup_period == 6
(= period + 1), name == "ROC". Add zero_previous_price_yields_zero_roc
feeding a leading zero followed by `period` more values so the front
of the window is exactly 0.0; the next emission must be the
flat-momentum fallback 0.0 (not NaN).

roc.rs is now at 82/82 lines, no behavioural change.

* test(ulcer_index): cover period/value accessors, name, zero-max fallback

Codecov flagged 10 lines in crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/ulcer_index.rs
(file at 93.86%):

  - const accessors period (77-80), value (82-85) — never queried
  - line 123 (`0.0` in the max_price == 0.0 drawdown fallback) — every
    test used prices > 0, so the trailing-max divisor was always positive
  - Indicator-impl name body (162-164) — never queried

Add accessors_and_metadata covering period/value/name. Add
zero_max_price_yields_zero_drawdown feeding a stream of zeros — the
trailing max is exactly 0.0 and the drawdown computation would
otherwise hit 0/0 NaN; the indicator must emit exactly 0.0
(drawdown is 0% by convention).

ulcer_index.rs is now at 163/163 lines, no behavioural change.

* test(williams_r): cover period accessor, warmup/name, zero-range branch

Codecov flagged 10 lines in crates/wickra-core/src/indicators/williams_r.rs
(file at 89.79%):

  - const accessor period (49-51) — never queried
  - line 78 (`Some(-50.0)` in the range == 0.0 fallback) — every test
    used H != L candles, so the lookback range was always positive
  - Indicator-impl warmup_period (87-89), name (95-97) — never queried

Add accessors_and_metadata covering period == 14, warmup_period == 14,
name == "WilliamsR". Add zero_range_yields_minus_fifty feeding flat
candles (H == L == close) — the lookback hi/lo coincide and the
divide-by-zero guard fires, returning the neutral mid-range value
-50.0.

williams_r.rs is now at 98/98 lines, no behavioural change.
This commit is contained in:
kingchenc
2026-05-24 00:46:56 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent b86cf68eb8
commit a9670b0ad1
5 changed files with 141 additions and 0 deletions
+31
View File
@@ -150,6 +150,37 @@ mod tests {
assert!(matches!(Pmo::new(35, 1), Err(Error::InvalidPeriod { .. })));
}
/// Cover the const accessors `periods` / `value` (lines 76-83) and the
/// Indicator-impl `name` body (130-132). `warmup_period` is already
/// covered by `first_emission_at_second_update`.
#[test]
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
let mut pmo = Pmo::new(35, 20).unwrap();
assert_eq!(pmo.periods(), (35, 20));
assert_eq!(pmo.name(), "PMO");
assert_eq!(pmo.value(), None);
pmo.update(100.0);
pmo.update(101.0);
assert!(pmo.value().is_some());
}
/// Cover the `prev == 0.0` defensive branch (line 103). The PMO ROC
/// divides by the previous price; existing tests use prices ≈ 100, so
/// the divide-by-zero guard never fired. Feed a single zero price
/// followed by a positive price and assert the first emitted PMO is
/// the flat-momentum value (the wrapping `customEMA` of `0.0` is 0.0
/// regardless of smoothing factor on its first input).
#[test]
fn zero_previous_price_treats_roc_as_flat() {
let mut pmo = Pmo::new(2, 2).unwrap();
// Seed prev_price = 0.
assert_eq!(pmo.update(0.0), None);
// Next bar: prev == 0 hits the fallback returning roc = 0.0; the
// doubly-smoothed PMO seeds at 0.0 (10 * 0 = 0 through both EMAs).
let out = pmo.update(50.0).expect("emits");
assert_eq!(out, 0.0);
}
#[test]
fn first_emission_at_second_update() {
let mut pmo = Pmo::new(35, 20).unwrap();
+28
View File
@@ -142,6 +142,34 @@ mod tests {
assert!(matches!(Ppo::new(12, 12), Err(Error::InvalidPeriod { .. })));
}
/// Cover the const accessors `periods` / `value` (lines 71-78) and the
/// Indicator-impl `name` body (122-124). `warmup_period` is already
/// covered by `first_emission_at_warmup_period`.
#[test]
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
let mut ppo = Ppo::new(12, 26).unwrap();
assert_eq!(ppo.periods(), (12, 26));
assert_eq!(ppo.name(), "PPO");
assert_eq!(ppo.value(), None);
for i in 1..=26 {
ppo.update(f64::from(i));
}
assert!(ppo.value().is_some());
}
/// Cover the `s == 0.0` defensive branch (line 96). PPO divides by
/// the slow EMA; existing tests use prices ≈ 100, so the slow EMA
/// is never 0. Feed a stream of zeros — both EMAs converge to 0.0
/// and the indicator must emit exactly 0.0 (flat-momentum fallback)
/// rather than NaN.
#[test]
fn zero_slow_ema_yields_zero_ppo() {
let mut ppo = Ppo::new(3, 6).unwrap();
let out = ppo.batch(&[0.0_f64; 20]);
let last = out.into_iter().flatten().last().expect("emits");
assert_eq!(last, 0.0);
}
#[test]
fn first_emission_at_warmup_period() {
let mut ppo = Ppo::new(3, 6).unwrap();
+24
View File
@@ -141,6 +141,30 @@ mod tests {
assert!(Roc::new(0).is_err());
}
/// Cover the const accessor `period` (47-49) and the Indicator-impl
/// `warmup_period` (83-85) + `name` (91-93). Existing tests never
/// inspect these metadata methods.
#[test]
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
let roc = Roc::new(5).unwrap();
assert_eq!(roc.period(), 5);
assert_eq!(roc.warmup_period(), 6);
assert_eq!(roc.name(), "ROC");
}
/// Cover the `prev == 0.0` defensive branch (line 70). All existing
/// tests use prices ≥ 1.0, so the divide-by-zero guard was never
/// triggered. Feed a leading zero followed by `period` more values
/// so the front of the window is exactly 0.0, then assert the next
/// emission is the flat-momentum fallback 0.0 (not NaN).
#[test]
fn zero_previous_price_yields_zero_roc() {
let mut roc = Roc::new(3).unwrap();
let out = roc.batch(&[0.0, 5.0, 7.0, 9.0]);
let v = out[3].expect("ready after period + 1 inputs");
assert_eq!(v, 0.0);
}
#[test]
fn ignores_non_finite_input() {
let mut roc = Roc::new(3).unwrap();
@@ -175,6 +175,35 @@ mod tests {
assert!(matches!(UlcerIndex::new(0), Err(Error::PeriodZero)));
}
/// Cover the const accessors `period` / `value` (lines 77-85) and the
/// Indicator-impl `name` body (162-164). `warmup_period` is covered
/// already by `reference_values`.
#[test]
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
let mut ui = UlcerIndex::new(14).unwrap();
assert_eq!(ui.period(), 14);
assert_eq!(ui.name(), "UlcerIndex");
assert_eq!(ui.value(), None);
// Drive past warmup so value() flips to Some.
for i in 0..ui.warmup_period() {
ui.update(100.0 + (i as f64).sin() * 5.0);
}
assert!(ui.value().is_some());
}
/// Cover the `max_price == 0.0` defensive branch (line 123). All
/// other tests use prices > 0, so the trailing-max divisor is always
/// positive. Feed a stream of zeros — the trailing max is exactly
/// 0.0 and the drawdown computation would otherwise hit a 0/0 NaN.
/// The indicator must emit exactly 0.0 (drawdown is 0% by convention).
#[test]
fn zero_max_price_yields_zero_drawdown() {
let mut ui = UlcerIndex::new(3).unwrap();
let out = ui.batch(&[0.0_f64; 10]);
let last = out.into_iter().flatten().last().expect("emits");
assert_eq!(last, 0.0);
}
#[test]
fn reference_values() {
// UlcerIndex(2): warmup = 3.
@@ -155,6 +155,35 @@ mod tests {
assert!(WilliamsR::new(0).is_err());
}
/// Cover the const accessor `period` (49-51) and the Indicator-impl
/// `warmup_period` (87-89) + `name` (95-97). Existing tests never
/// inspect these metadata methods.
#[test]
fn accessors_and_metadata() {
let w = WilliamsR::new(14).unwrap();
assert_eq!(w.period(), 14);
assert_eq!(w.warmup_period(), 14);
assert_eq!(w.name(), "WilliamsR");
}
/// Cover the `range == 0.0` defensive branch (line 78). All other
/// tests use H != L candles so the lookback range is always positive.
/// Feed a stream of perfectly flat candles (H == L == close) — the
/// lookback hi/lo coincide and the divide-by-zero guard fires,
/// returning the neutral mid-range value -50.0.
#[test]
fn zero_range_yields_minus_fifty() {
let candles: Vec<Candle> = (0..5).map(|_| c(10.0, 10.0, 10.0)).collect();
let mut w = WilliamsR::new(3).unwrap();
let last = w
.batch(&candles)
.into_iter()
.flatten()
.last()
.expect("emits");
assert_eq!(last, -50.0);
}
#[test]
fn reset_clears_state() {
let candles: Vec<Candle> = (0..20)