mirror of
https://github.com/chainstacklabs/pumpfun-bonkfun-bot.git
synced 2026-07-27 23:37:45 +00:00
chore(pumpswap): post-2026-04-28 cutover + cashback layout (#168)
* chore(pumpswap+docs): post-2026-04-28-cutover PumpSwap unlock + IDL docs Drops the `INCLUDE_BREAKING_FEE_ACCOUNTS = False` gate in the PumpSwap learning examples so the +2 breaking-fee accounts (fee recipient readonly + its quote-mint ATA mutable) are always appended after `pool-v2`. Mainnet pump-amm rejects this format pre-cutover (verified 6023 Overflow), so this PR is intentionally **draft until 2026-04-28 16:00 UTC** when the cutover happens; mark it ready-for-review and live- test then. Also captures the protocol gotchas we learned during this migration: - README: a new "2026-04-28 program upgrade" section + an explicit note that the vendored IDL is incomplete (missing `bonding-curve-v2` and `pool-v2` PDAs that the on-chain program actually requires) with pointers to cross-check against on-chain txs. - CLAUDE.md: a new "Pump.fun protocol notes" subsection summarising the same gotchas plus the BC/Pool/CreateEvent layout details and the extreme_fast_mode gotcha. Open question (call out at review time, resolve post-cutover): - BREAKING_FEE_RECIPIENT.md shows PumpSwap cashback account counts of 27 buy / 26 sell vs 26 / 24 non-cashback — the extra cashback account seed/position isn't documented. Need to sample a real successful cashback PumpSwap tx after cutover and add the branch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(pumpswap): wire cashback layout for post-2026-04-28 program upgrade Cashback PumpSwap pools require extra writable accounts inserted before pool-v2. Identified layouts by sampling on-chain post-cutover txs: - buy: insert user_volume_accumulator_quote_ata (27 accounts vs 26) ref tx 4JaWdExj…fvjK - sell: insert user_volume_accumulator_quote_ata + user_volume_accumulator (26 accounts vs 24) ref tx 4ei1cJV7…NP3 Detect via pool account byte 244 (is_cashback_coin). Adds the standalone sample_cashback_pumpswap.py used to reverse-engineer the layouts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -124,6 +124,22 @@ This helps ensure reliable operation within your node provider's rate limits wit
|
||||
|
||||
The IDLs under [`idl/`](idl/) are vendored from [pump-fun/pump-public-docs](https://github.com/pump-fun/pump-public-docs). To refresh, copy `pump.json`, `pump_amm.json`, `pump_fees.json` from that repo into `pump_fun_idl.json`, `pump_swap_idl.json`, `pump_fees.json` respectively, and reference the upstream commit hash in your commit message.
|
||||
|
||||
> **The IDL is incomplete.** It doesn't list two PDAs that the on-chain program actually requires:
|
||||
> - `bonding-curve-v2` — required on every BC `buy` (18 accounts) and `sell` (16/17 accounts). Seed: `["bonding-curve-v2", mint]` under the pump program.
|
||||
> - `pool-v2` — required on every PumpSwap `buy`/`sell`. Seed: `["pool-v2", base_mint]` under the pump-amm program. **Without it, pump-amm throws `AnchorError 6023 (Overflow)` after the trade transfers complete** — a misleading error code for a missing-account issue.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Always cross-check your account lists against a recent successful on-chain tx (`getSignaturesForAddress` + `getTransaction`) before trusting the IDL.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-04-28 program upgrade
|
||||
|
||||
Pump.fun shipped a breaking program upgrade on **2026-04-28 16:00 UTC** ([BREAKING_FEE_RECIPIENT.md](https://github.com/pump-fun/pump-public-docs/blob/main/docs/BREAKING_FEE_RECIPIENT.md)). The bot is updated for it:
|
||||
|
||||
- BC `buy` ix is now **18 accounts** (was 17). Trailing account is one of 8 `BREAKING_FEE_RECIPIENTS` (mutable), AFTER `bonding-curve-v2`.
|
||||
- BC `sell` ix is now **16 accounts non-cashback / 17 cashback** (was 15/16). Same trailing fee recipient.
|
||||
- PumpSwap `buy`/`sell` get **+2 accounts** appended after `pool-v2`: a fee recipient (readonly) and its quote-mint ATA (mutable). Counts: buy = 26 non-cashback / 27 cashback; sell = 24 / 26. Cashback pools insert `user_volume_accumulator_quote_ata` (writable) BEFORE `pool-v2` on buys; sells insert both that ATA and `user_volume_accumulator` (both writable) BEFORE `pool-v2`. Detect cashback via pool data byte 244.
|
||||
|
||||
The 8 fee recipients are randomized per tx in code (per pump.fun's recommendation to spread program-tx throughput).
|
||||
|
||||
## Changelog
|
||||
|
||||
Quick note on a couple on a few new scripts in `/learning-examples`:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user