mirror of
https://github.com/floor-licker/polyfill-rs.git
synced 2026-08-26 02:48:07 +00:00
tests: Improve e2e auth test coverage
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
|
||||
// Test order posting - the critical endpoint that had the 401 bug
|
||||
use polyfill_rs::{ClobClient, OrderArgs, Side};
|
||||
use rust_decimal::Decimal;
|
||||
use std::env;
|
||||
use std::str::FromStr;
|
||||
|
||||
#[tokio::test(flavor = "multi_thread")]
|
||||
#[ignore]
|
||||
async fn test_post_order_authentication() {
|
||||
dotenvy::dotenv().ok();
|
||||
|
||||
let private_key = env::var("POLYMARKET_PRIVATE_KEY")
|
||||
.expect("POLYMARKET_PRIVATE_KEY must be set in .env");
|
||||
|
||||
let mut client = ClobClient::with_l1_headers(
|
||||
"https://clob.polymarket.com",
|
||||
&private_key,
|
||||
137
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
println!("Step 1: Creating API credentials...");
|
||||
let creds = client.create_or_derive_api_key(None).await
|
||||
.expect("Failed to create API key");
|
||||
client.set_api_creds(creds);
|
||||
println!("API credentials set");
|
||||
|
||||
// Use a well-known token ID (we'll use an extreme price so it won't fill)
|
||||
let token_id = "21742633143463906290569050155826241533067272736897614950488156847949938836455"; // Example token
|
||||
|
||||
println!("\nStep 2: Attempting to post order (testing authentication)...");
|
||||
let order_args = OrderArgs {
|
||||
token_id: token_id.to_string(),
|
||||
price: Decimal::from_str("0.01").unwrap(), // Very low price, won't fill
|
||||
size: Decimal::from_str("1.0").unwrap(),
|
||||
side: Side::BUY,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let result = client.create_and_post_order(&order_args).await;
|
||||
|
||||
match result {
|
||||
Ok(response) => {
|
||||
println!("AUTHENTICATION SUCCESSFUL! Order was accepted by API");
|
||||
println!(" Response: {:?}", response);
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to cancel it if we got an order ID
|
||||
if let Some(order_id) = response.get("orderID").and_then(|v| v.as_str()) {
|
||||
println!("\nStep 3: Canceling order...");
|
||||
match client.cancel(order_id).await {
|
||||
Ok(_) => println!("Order canceled successfully"),
|
||||
Err(e) => println!("Cancel failed (order might have expired): {:?}", e),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
let err_str = format!("{:?}", e);
|
||||
|
||||
// The critical test: Is it a 401 error?
|
||||
if err_str.contains("401") {
|
||||
panic!("CRITICAL FAILURE: 401 Unauthorized!\n\
|
||||
The HMAC authentication bug is NOT fixed!\n\
|
||||
Error: {:?}", e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If it's a 400 error with validation issues, that's actually GOOD
|
||||
// It means authentication worked, but there's an issue with the order parameters
|
||||
if err_str.contains("400") {
|
||||
println!("AUTHENTICATION SUCCESSFUL!");
|
||||
println!(" (Got 400 validation error, which means auth passed)");
|
||||
println!(" Error details: {}", err_str);
|
||||
|
||||
// These are expected validation errors when auth works
|
||||
if err_str.contains("insufficient") ||
|
||||
err_str.contains("balance") ||
|
||||
err_str.contains("allowance") ||
|
||||
err_str.contains("POLY_AMOUNT_TOO_SMALL") ||
|
||||
err_str.contains("invalid") ||
|
||||
err_str.contains("market") {
|
||||
println!(" This is an expected validation error - authentication is working!");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Any other error type
|
||||
println!("Got unexpected error (not 401, so auth might be OK): {:?}", e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user