gavindiaz/polyfill-rs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/floor-licker/polyfill-rs.git synced 2026-07-27 20:47:46 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: move performance comparison table higher in README, reorder columns to highlight polyfill-rs results first, and remove bold formatting from metrics for cleaner presentation

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
floor-licker
2025-12-05 19:11:28 -05:00
parent 9993e51c7f
commit 0bcc5b2a79
1 changed files with 12 additions and 13 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
README.md
+12 -13
View File
@@ -42,6 +42,18 @@ async fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
**Production Hardened**: Designed for co-located environments processing 100k+ market data updates per second
## Performance Comparison
Performance comparison with existing implementations:
| | polyfill-rs | polymarket-rs-client | Official Python client |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Create a order with EIP-712 signature. | ~157ms (1.7x faster) | 266.5 ms ± 28.6 ms | 1.127 s ± 0.047 s |
| Fetch and parse json(simplified markets). | ~394ms (1.0x competitive) | 404.5 ms ± 22.9 ms | 1.366 s ± 0.048 s |
| Fetch markets. Mem usage | 774 allocs, 738 frees, 30,245 bytes allocated (527x less memory) | 88,053 allocs, 81,823 frees, 15,945,966 bytes allocated | 211,898 allocs, 202,962 frees, 128,457,588 bytes allocated |
| Order book updates (1000 ops) | ~118 µs (8,500 updates/sec) | N/A | N/A |
| Fast spread/mid calculations | ~2.3 ns (434M ops/sec) | N/A | N/A |
## Migration from polymarket-rs-client
**Drop-in replacement in 2 steps:**
@@ -142,19 +154,6 @@ Precision-performance tradeoff optimization through boundary quantization:
**Implementation notes**: Performance-critical sections include cycle count analysis and memory access pattern documentation. Cache miss profiling and branch prediction optimization detailed in inline comments.
## Benchmark Comparison
Performance comparison with existing implementations:
| | polymarket-rs-client | Official Python client | polyfill-rs |
|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Create a order with EIP-712 signature. | **266.5 ms ± 28.6 ms** | 1.127 s ± 0.047 s | **~157ms** (1.7x faster) |
| Fetch and parse json(simplified markets). | **404.5 ms ± 22.9 ms** | 1.366 s ± 0.048 s | **~394ms** (1.0x competitive) |
| Fetch markets. Mem usage | **88,053 allocs, 81,823 frees, 15,945,966 bytes allocated** | 211,898 allocs, 202,962 frees, 128,457,588 bytes allocated | **774 allocs, 738 frees, 30,245 bytes allocated** (527x less memory) |
| Order book updates (1000 ops) | N/A | N/A | **~118 µs** (8,500 updates/sec) |
| Fast spread/mid calculations | N/A | N/A | **~2.3 ns** (434M ops/sec) |
*Note: All benchmarks measured with real operations. Network performance includes actual HTTP requests, memory usage measured with custom allocator tracking, computational performance measured with criterion benchmarks.*
### Performance Advantages