Optimal Control: 94 to 610 lines with HJB theory, viscosity solutions, finite differences HMM API: 16 to 571 lines with complete API reference and usage examples
19 KiB
API Reference: Hidden Markov Model (HMM)
The HMM class provides a complete implementation of Hidden Markov Models with Gaussian emissions for regime detection, time series modeling, and state inference.
Quick Start
from optimizr import HMM
import numpy as np
# Create model with 2 hidden states (e.g., bull/bear market)
model = HMM(n_states=2)
# Train on returns data
returns = np.random.randn(1000, 1) # Should be 2D: (n_samples, n_features)
model.fit(returns, n_iterations=100, tolerance=1e-6)
# Decode most likely state sequence (Viterbi)
states = model.predict(returns)
# Compute log-likelihood (for model comparison)
logp = model.score(returns)
print(f"Log-likelihood: {logp:.2f}")
print(f"Decoded states: {states[:10]}")
Constructor
HMM(n_states: int)
Creates a new Hidden Markov Model with Gaussian emissions.
Parameters:
n_states(int): Number of hidden states/regimes. Common choices:n_states=2: Binary regime (e.g., bull/bear, high/low volatility)n_states=3: Three-regime model (e.g., bull/sideways/bear)n_states>3: Fine-grained regime detection (requires more data)
Returns:
HMMobject with random initialization
Initialization:
- Transition matrix
A: Uniform with slight self-transition bias - Initial state distribution
\pi: Uniform - Emission parameters (means
\mu_i, covariances\Sigma_i): From K-means clustering
Example:
# Binary regime model
hmm_2 = HMM(n_states=2)
# Three-regime model for more nuanced detection
hmm_3 = HMM(n_states=3)
When to use:
n_states=2: Most common, sufficient for many applications- Higher
n_states: When you have strong prior belief in multiple regimes and sufficient data (>1000 samples per state)
Methods
fit(X, n_iterations=100, tolerance=1e-6, n_init=1, random_state=None)
Trains the HMM on observed data using the Baum-Welch (Expectation-Maximization) algorithm.
Parameters:
X(np.ndarray): Training data of shape(n_samples, n_features)- For univariate time series: reshape to
(n, 1)withX.reshape(-1, 1) - For multivariate: pass directly as
(n, d)wheredis feature dimension
- For univariate time series: reshape to
n_iterations(int, default=100): Maximum number of EM iterations- Typical range: 50-200
- More iterations → better convergence but slower training
tolerance(float, default=1e-6): Convergence threshold- Algorithm stops when log-likelihood improvement <
tolerance - Typical range: 1e-8 to 1e-4
- Smaller values → tighter convergence but more iterations
- Algorithm stops when log-likelihood improvement <
n_init(int, default=1): Number of random initializations- The best model (highest log-likelihood) is kept
- Recommended: 5-10 for production models (helps avoid local minima)
random_state(int, optional): Random seed for reproducibility
Returns:
self: The fitted HMM object (for method chaining)
Algorithm: Baum-Welch (EM for HMMs)
The Baum-Welch algorithm iteratively refines model parameters:
-
E-step: Compute state occupation probabilities
- Forward pass:
\alpha_t(i) = P(O_1, \ldots, O_t, S_t = i \mid \lambda) - Backward pass:
\beta_t(i) = P(O_{t+1}, \ldots, O_T \mid S_t = i, \lambda) - State probabilities:
\gamma_t(i) = \frac{\alpha_t(i)\beta_t(i)}{\sum_j \alpha_t(j)\beta_t(j)} - Transition probabilities:
\xi_t(i,j) = \frac{\alpha_t(i)a_{ij}b_j(O_{t+1})\beta_{t+1}(j)}{\sum_{i,j}\alpha_t(i)a_{ij}b_j(O_{t+1})\beta_{t+1}(j)}
- Forward pass:
-
M-step: Update model parameters
- Initial probabilities:
\pi_i = \gamma_1(i) - Transition matrix:
a_{ij} = \frac{\sum_{t=1}^{T-1}\xi_t(i,j)}{\sum_{t=1}^{T-1}\gamma_t(i)} - Emission means:
\mu_i = \frac{\sum_{t=1}^T \gamma_t(i) O_t}{\sum_{t=1}^T \gamma_t(i)} - Emission covariances:
\Sigma_i = \frac{\sum_{t=1}^T \gamma_t(i)(O_t - \mu_i)(O_t - \mu_i)^T}{\sum_{t=1}^T \gamma_t(i)}
- Initial probabilities:
-
Convergence: Repeat until log-likelihood change < tolerance
Example:
import numpy as np
from optimizr import HMM
# Simulate two-regime data
np.random.seed(42)
n = 2000
# Regime 1: low volatility (first 1000 samples)
regime1 = np.random.normal(0.0, 0.5, 1000)
# Regime 2: high volatility (last 1000 samples)
regime2 = np.random.normal(0.0, 2.0, 1000)
data = np.concatenate([regime1, regime2]).reshape(-1, 1)
# Train HMM
hmm = HMM(n_states=2)
hmm.fit(data, n_iterations=200, tolerance=1e-6, n_init=5)
print("Training complete")
Convergence diagnostics:
# Plot log-likelihood over iterations (requires storing history)
# Check if converged before max_iter
# Verify parameters make sense (e.g., distinct means for each state)
Typical training time:
- 1000 samples, 2 states, 100 iterations: ~50-100ms
- 10000 samples, 3 states, 200 iterations: ~500ms-1s
predict(X)
Decodes the most likely sequence of hidden states using the Viterbi algorithm.
Parameters:
X(np.ndarray): Observation sequence of shape(n_samples, n_features)- Must match feature dimension used in
fit()
- Must match feature dimension used in
Returns:
states(np.ndarray): Most likely state sequence of shape(n_samples,)- Values are integers in range
[0, n_states-1]
- Values are integers in range
Algorithm: Viterbi
The Viterbi algorithm finds the globally optimal state sequence:
- Initialization:
\delta_1(i) = \pi_i \cdot b_i(O_1) - Recursion:
\delta_t(j) = \max_i[\delta_{t-1}(i) \cdot a_{ij}] \cdot b_j(O_t) - Termination:
P^* = \max_i[\delta_T(i)] - Backtracking: Trace back from
\arg\max_i[\delta_T(i)]to recover state sequence
Complexity: O(T \cdot K^2) where T is sequence length, K is number of states
Example:
# After training (see fit() example)
states = hmm.predict(data)
# Analyze regime distribution
unique, counts = np.unique(states, return_counts=True)
for state, count in zip(unique, counts):
print(f"State {state}: {count} samples ({count/len(states)*100:.1f}%)")
# Identify regime switches
switches = np.where(np.diff(states) != 0)[0]
print(f"Number of regime switches: {len(switches)}")
# Use for trading: buy in regime 0, sell in regime 1
current_state = states[-1]
if current_state == 0:
print("Signal: BUY (low volatility regime)")
else:
print("Signal: SELL (high volatility regime)")
Use cases:
- Regime detection: Identify market states (bull/bear, high/low vol)
- Trading signals: Generate buy/sell signals based on regime
- Risk management: Adjust position size based on estimated regime
- Anomaly detection: Flag unusual regime transitions
score(X)
Computes the log-likelihood of the observation sequence under the fitted model.
Parameters:
X(np.ndarray): Observation sequence of shape(n_samples, n_features)
Returns:
logp(float): Log-likelihood\log P(O \mid \lambda)
Algorithm: Forward Algorithm
The forward algorithm efficiently computes the likelihood:
- Initialization:
\alpha_1(i) = \pi_i \cdot b_i(O_1) - Induction:
\alpha_t(j) = \left[\sum_{i=1}^K \alpha_{t-1}(i) \cdot a_{ij}\right] \cdot b_j(O_t) - Termination:
P(O \mid \lambda) = \sum_{i=1}^K \alpha_T(i)
Numerical stability: Uses log-space computation with scaling to avoid underflow.
Example:
# Model comparison: which number of states fits best?
logp_scores = {}
for n_states in [2, 3, 4]:
hmm = HMM(n_states=n_states)
hmm.fit(data, n_iterations=100)
logp = hmm.score(data)
logp_scores[n_states] = logp
print(f"{n_states} states: log-likelihood = {logp:.2f}")
# Higher log-likelihood is better (but watch for overfitting)
best_k = max(logp_scores, key=logp_scores.get)
print(f"Best model: {best_k} states")
# Use BIC for model selection (penalizes complexity)
def bic(logp, n_params, n_samples):
return -2 * logp + n_params * np.log(n_samples)
n_samples = len(data)
for n_states in [2, 3, 4]:
n_params = n_states**2 + 2*n_states # Approx: A, pi, means, variances
bic_score = bic(logp_scores[n_states], n_params, n_samples)
print(f"{n_states} states: BIC = {bic_score:.2f}")
Use cases:
- Model selection: Compare models with different
n_statesusing BIC/AIC - Convergence monitoring: Track log-likelihood during training
- Outlier detection: Low likelihood → data doesn't match model
- Model reliability: Higher likelihood → better fit (but watch overfitting)
Complete Example: Market Regime Detection
Here's a complete workflow for detecting market regimes in financial data:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from optimizr import HMM
# 1. Load financial data (example: S&P 500 returns)
# In practice, load from your data source
np.random.seed(42)
n_samples = 2000
# Simulate returns with regime changes
returns = []
for i in range(n_samples):
if i < 500: # Bull market
returns.append(np.random.normal(0.001, 0.01))
elif i < 1000: # Correction
returns.append(np.random.normal(-0.002, 0.02))
elif i < 1500: # Recovery
returns.append(np.random.normal(0.001, 0.015))
else: # Bear market
returns.append(np.random.normal(-0.001, 0.025))
returns = np.array(returns).reshape(-1, 1)
# 2. Train HMM with multiple initializations
print("Training HMM...")
hmm = HMM(n_states=3) # 3 regimes: bull, neutral, bear
hmm.fit(returns, n_iterations=200, tolerance=1e-6, n_init=10)
# 3. Decode regimes
states = hmm.predict(returns)
# 4. Analyze regimes
print("\nRegime Statistics:")
for state_id in range(3):
mask = (states == state_id)
state_returns = returns[mask]
mean_ret = np.mean(state_returns)
std_ret = np.std(state_returns)
count = np.sum(mask)
print(f"State {state_id}:")
print(f" Count: {count} ({count/len(returns)*100:.1f}%)")
print(f" Mean return: {mean_ret:.4f}")
print(f" Volatility: {std_ret:.4f}")
print(f" Sharpe (annualized): {mean_ret/std_ret * np.sqrt(252):.2f}")
# 5. Identify regime switches
switches = np.where(np.diff(states) != 0)[0] + 1
print(f"\nRegime switches: {len(switches)}")
print(f"Average regime duration: {len(returns)/len(switches):.1f} days")
# 6. Visualize regimes
plt.figure(figsize=(14, 8))
# Plot returns with regime colors
plt.subplot(3, 1, 1)
colors = ['green', 'yellow', 'red']
for state_id in range(3):
mask = (states == state_id)
plt.scatter(np.where(mask)[0], returns[mask],
c=colors[state_id], alpha=0.5, s=10,
label=f'State {state_id}')
plt.ylabel('Returns')
plt.title('Returns colored by HMM regime')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Plot cumulative returns per regime
plt.subplot(3, 1, 2)
cumulative = np.cumsum(returns.flatten())
plt.plot(cumulative, color='black', linewidth=1)
for switch in switches:
plt.axvline(switch, color='red', alpha=0.3, linestyle='--')
plt.ylabel('Cumulative Returns')
plt.title('Cumulative returns with regime switches')
plt.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Plot state sequence
plt.subplot(3, 1, 3)
plt.plot(states, linewidth=0.5)
plt.ylabel('State')
plt.xlabel('Time')
plt.title('Decoded state sequence')
plt.yticks(range(3))
plt.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('hmm_regime_detection.png', dpi=150)
print("\nPlot saved to hmm_regime_detection.png")
# 7. Generate trading signals
current_state = states[-1]
state_returns = returns[states == current_state]
expected_return = np.mean(state_returns)
expected_vol = np.std(state_returns)
print(f"\nCurrent regime: State {current_state}")
print(f"Expected return: {expected_return:.4f}")
print(f"Expected volatility: {expected_vol:.4f}")
if expected_return > 0.0005:
signal = "BUY"
position_size = 1.0
elif expected_return < -0.0005:
signal = "SELL"
position_size = 0.0
else:
signal = "HOLD"
position_size = 0.5
print(f"Trading signal: {signal}")
print(f"Recommended position size: {position_size*100:.0f}%")
Advanced Usage
Model Selection with BIC
Choose the optimal number of states using Bayesian Information Criterion:
from optimizr import HMM
import numpy as np
def bic_score(hmm, X):
"""Compute BIC for HMM: BIC = -2*log(L) + k*log(n)"""
logp = hmm.score(X)
n_states = hmm.n_states # Assuming this attribute exists
n_features = X.shape[1]
# Parameters: transition matrix + initial prob + means + covariances
k = n_states**2 + n_states + n_states*n_features + n_states*n_features**2
n = X.shape[0]
return -2*logp + k*np.log(n)
# Test different numbers of states
results = []
for n_states in range(2, 6):
hmm = HMM(n_states=n_states)
hmm.fit(data, n_iterations=100, n_init=5)
bic = bic_score(hmm, data)
logp = hmm.score(data)
results.append((n_states, logp, bic))
print(f"{n_states} states: log-likelihood={logp:.2f}, BIC={bic:.2f}")
# Best model has lowest BIC
best_n_states = min(results, key=lambda x: x[2])[0]
print(f"\nBest model: {best_n_states} states")
Integration with Optimal Control
Combine HMM regime detection with regime-specific optimal control:
from optimizr import HMM, estimate_ou_params_py, solve_hjb_py
# 1. Detect regimes with HMM
returns = np.diff(spread)
hmm = HMM(n_states=2)
hmm.fit(returns.reshape(-1, 1), n_iterations=100)
regimes = hmm.predict(returns.reshape(-1, 1))
# 2. Estimate OU parameters per regime
thresholds = {}
for regime_id in range(2):
mask = (regimes == regime_id)
spread_regime = spread[1:][mask] # Align with returns
# Estimate OU parameters
kappa, theta, sigma, half_life = estimate_ou_params_py(
spread_regime, dt=1/252
)
# Solve HJB for regime-specific thresholds
lower, upper, _, _ = solve_hjb_py(
kappa=kappa, theta=theta, sigma=sigma,
rho=0.04, transaction_cost=0.001
)
thresholds[regime_id] = (lower, upper)
print(f"Regime {regime_id}: κ={kappa:.2f}, thresholds=({lower:.3f}, {upper:.3f})")
# 3. Apply regime-aware trading
current_regime = regimes[-1]
lower, upper = thresholds[current_regime]
current_spread = spread[-1]
if current_spread < lower:
action = "BUY"
elif current_spread > upper:
action = "SELL"
else:
action = "HOLD"
print(f"\nCurrent regime: {current_regime}")
print(f"Current spread: {current_spread:.3f}")
print(f"Thresholds: ({lower:.3f}, {upper:.3f})")
print(f"Action: {action}")
Multivariate HMM
For multiple features (e.g., returns + volume + volatility):
# Prepare multivariate data
returns = np.random.randn(1000, 1)
volume = np.random.randn(1000, 1)
volatility = np.random.randn(1000, 1)
# Stack features
X = np.hstack([returns, volume, volatility]) # Shape: (1000, 3)
# Train multivariate HMM
hmm = HMM(n_states=3)
hmm.fit(X, n_iterations=150)
# Decode regimes based on all features
states = hmm.predict(X)
# Each state now captures joint patterns in returns, volume, and volatility
Best Practices
Data Preparation
-
Scaling: Standardize features to similar scales
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler scaler = StandardScaler() X_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X) -
Stationarity: Ensure time series is stationary (use returns, not prices)
returns = np.diff(np.log(prices)) # Log returns -
Outlier handling: Winsorize extreme values
from scipy.stats import mstats X_winsorized = mstats.winsorize(X, limits=[0.01, 0.01])
Model Training
- Multiple initializations: Use
n_init=5-10to avoid local minima - Convergence: Monitor log-likelihood, ensure convergence before
max_iter - Validation: Use held-out data to verify generalization
Parameter Selection
- Number of states: Start with 2-3, increase if necessary
- Iterations: 100-200 typically sufficient
- Tolerance: 1e-6 for production, 1e-4 for quick experimentation
Practical Tips
- Minimum data: Use at least 500 samples per state (1000+ for 2-state model)
- Regime persistence: Check average regime duration is meaningful (not too short)
- Physical interpretation: Verify decoded regimes make sense (e.g., high-vol state has higher variance)
- Robustness: Test on multiple time periods, verify stability
Troubleshooting
Model not converging
- Symptom: Log-likelihood oscillating or not improving
- Fix: Increase
n_iterations; try differentn_init; check data scaling
All samples assigned to one state
- Symptom:
predict()returns all 0s or all 1s - Fix: Reduce
n_states; check data has sufficient variation; verify stationarity
Unrealistic regime switches
- Symptom: State changes every few samples
- Fix: Add transition probability constraints (requires model extension); increase minimum regime duration
Poor out-of-sample performance
- Symptom: High in-sample log-likelihood but poor predictions on new data
- Fix: Reduce
n_states(overfitting); use cross-validation; add regularization
Performance Characteristics
Computational Complexity
-
Training (Baum-Welch):
O(I \cdot T \cdot K^2)I: number of iterations (~100-200)T: sequence lengthK: number of states
-
Prediction (Viterbi):
O(T \cdot K^2) -
Scoring (Forward):
O(T \cdot K^2)
Memory Requirements
- Model parameters:
O(K^2 + K \cdot d^2)wheredis feature dimension - Forward/backward matrices:
O(T \cdot K)
Typical Runtimes (on modern CPU)
- Train (1000 samples, 2 states, 100 iter): ~50-100ms
- Train (10000 samples, 3 states, 200 iter): ~500ms-1s
- Predict (1000 samples, 2 states): ~5-10ms
- Score (1000 samples, 2 states): ~5-10ms
References
Hidden Markov Models
- Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257-286.
- Murphy, K. P. (2012). Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. MIT Press. (Chapter 17: Markov and hidden Markov models)
Financial Applications
- Guidolin, M., & Timmermann, A. (2008). International asset allocation under regime switching, skew, and kurtosis preferences. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 889-935.
- Nystrup, P., Madsen, H., & Lindström, E. (2015). Stylised facts of financial time series and hidden Markov models in continuous time. Quantitative Finance, 15(9), 1531-1541.
- Ang, A., & Bekaert, G. (2002). Regime switches in interest rates. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(2), 163-182.
Algorithms
- Forney, G. D. (1973). The Viterbi algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE, 61(3), 268-278.
- Baum, L. E., Petrie, T., Soules, G., & Weiss, N. (1970). A maximization technique occurring in the statistical analysis of probabilistic functions of Markov chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41(1), 164-171.
See Also
- HMM Algorithms - Detailed mathematical foundations (Forward-Backward, Viterbi, Baum-Welch)
- Optimal Control - Integrate HMM regimes with optimal control
- Optimal Control API - API reference for control algorithms