Files
optimiz-rs/docs/ENHANCEMENT_STRATEGY.md
T

408 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# OptimizR Enhancement Strategy
**Date**: January 2, 2025
**Context**: Post-Polarway Phase 4, exploring integration and improvements
**Based On**: v0.2.0 codebase review, roadmap analysis, synergy opportunities
## Current State Analysis
### ✅ What's Implemented (v0.2.0)
1. **Core Algorithms**:
- Differential Evolution (5 strategies: rand1, best1, currenttobest1, rand2, best2)
- Hidden Markov Models (Baum-Welch, Viterbi)
- MCMC Sampling (Metropolis-Hastings, adaptive proposals)
- Grid Search
- Information Theory (mutual information, Shannon entropy)
2. **Advanced Features (v0.2.0)**:
- Sparse Optimization (Sparse PCA, Box-Tao, Elastic Net)
- Optimal Control (HJB solver, regime switching, jump diffusion)
- Risk Metrics (Hurst exponent, half-life, bootstrap)
- Mathematical Toolkit (numerical differentiation, linear algebra, statistics)
3. **Architecture**:
- Trait-based design (Optimizer, Sampler, InformationMeasure)
- Builder pattern for configuration
- Functional programming utilities (composition, memoization, pipes)
- Rayon dependency already present
- Feature flag infrastructure (`parallel` feature exists)
### ⚠️ What's Missing/Incomplete
1. **Parallelization BLOCKED**:
- Infrastructure exists (Rayon trait, ParallelExecutor trait in core.rs)
- DE has `parallel` parameter but **disabled** due to Python GIL
- Comment: "Python callbacks cannot be safely parallelized due to GIL"
- Grid search marked as "future: Expected 50-100x speedup"
2. **Advanced DE Variants (Roadmap v0.3.0)**:
- JADE (jDE with archive)
- SHADE (Success-History based Adaptive DE)
- L-SHADE (with linear population reduction)
- Current: Only basic jDE adaptive control
3. **Multi-Objective Optimization (Roadmap)**:
- NSGA-DE (Non-dominated Sorting)
- MODE (Multi-Objective DE)
- Pareto front computation
4. **GPU Acceleration (Roadmap)**:
- CUDA kernels
- OpenCL support
- 10-100× additional speedup
5. **Additional Algorithms (Roadmap)**:
- Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)
- CMA-ES (Covariance Matrix Adaptation)
- Simulated Annealing
- Ant Colony Optimization
## Synergy Opportunities: Polarway + OptimizR
### 1. Time-Series Feature Engineering for HMM
**Description**: Use Polarway's time-series operations to create features for regime detection
**Implementation**:
```python
# Polarway: Fast feature creation
df = client.lag(['price'], periods=1) # Lagged prices
df = client.pct_change(['price'], periods=1) # Returns
df = client.diff(['price'], periods=1) # Price changes
# OptimizR: Regime detection on features
returns = df['price_pct_change'].to_numpy()
hmm = HMM(n_states=3) # Bull, Bear, Sideways
hmm.fit(returns, n_iterations=100)
states = hmm.predict(returns)
```
**Value**:
- Polarway provides fast feature engineering (50-200× faster for large datasets)
- OptimizR provides statistical inference (HMM regime detection)
- Combined: Real-time regime switching for trading strategies
### 2. Risk Metrics on Time-Series Data
**Description**: Calculate advanced risk metrics using both systems
**Implementation**:
```python
# Polarway: Efficient return calculation
df = client.pct_change(['price'], periods=1)
returns = df['price_pct_change'].to_numpy()
# OptimizR: Risk analysis
hurst = compute_hurst_exponent(returns) # Mean-reversion detection
half_life = estimate_half_life(returns) # Reversion time
risk_metrics = compute_risk_metrics(returns) # Comprehensive suite
```
**Value**:
- Fast preprocessing (Polarway) + sophisticated analysis (OptimizR)
- Useful for pairs trading, mean-reversion strategies
- Real-time risk monitoring
### 3. Optimal Control with Market Data
**Description**: Dynamic portfolio rebalancing with regime-dependent strategies
**Implementation**:
```python
# Polarway: Multi-asset feature creation
df = client.lag(['spy_price', 'vix'], periods=[1, 5, 20])
df = client.pct_change(['spy_price'], periods=1)
# OptimizR: Solve optimal control problem
# State: [price, volatility regime]
# Control: portfolio weights
value_fn = solve_hjb_regime_switching(...)
```
**Value**:
- Combines fast data processing with optimal control theory
- Regime-dependent strategies (bull vs bear market)
- Practical for HFT and algorithmic trading
### 4. Parameter Optimization for Trading Strategies
**Description**: Use DE to optimize strategy parameters on time-series data
**Implementation**:
```python
# Polarway: Backtest execution (fast data ops)
def backtest_strategy(params):
df = client.lag(['price'], periods=int(params[0]))
# ... strategy logic ...
return -sharpe_ratio # Minimize negative Sharpe
# OptimizR: Find optimal parameters
result = differential_evolution(
objective_fn=backtest_strategy,
bounds=[(1, 50), (0.01, 0.5)], # [lag_period, threshold]
maxiter=500,
strategy='rand1'
)
```
**Value**:
- Polarway handles heavy data processing
- OptimizR finds optimal parameters
- 74-88× faster than SciPy DE
## High-Priority Enhancements
### Priority 1: Enable Parallelization for Pure-Rust Objectives
**Problem**: `parallel` parameter exists but disabled due to Python GIL issues
**Solution**: Create Rust-native objective function trait for GIL-free parallelization
**Implementation Strategy**:
1. Add `RustObjectiveFn` trait separate from Python callbacks
2. Implement parallel evaluation for Rust-native functions
3. Keep Python callbacks sequential (GIL limitation)
4. Enable parallel grid search (no Python callbacks needed for grid)
**Code Outline**:
```rust
// In src/core.rs or src/differential_evolution.rs
/// Rust-native objective function (no Python, no GIL)
pub trait RustObjective: Send + Sync {
fn evaluate(&self, x: &[f64]) -> f64;
}
/// Parallel evaluation for Rust objectives
#[cfg(feature = "parallel")]
fn evaluate_population_parallel<F: RustObjective>(
objective: &F,
population: &[Vec<f64>]
) -> Vec<f64> {
use rayon::prelude::*;
population.par_iter()
.map(|individual| objective.evaluate(individual))
.collect()
}
// Python binding for benchmarking
#[pyfunction]
fn differential_evolution_rust(
objective_name: &str, // "sphere", "rosenbrock", "rastrigin"
bounds: Vec<(f64, f64)>,
parallel: bool, // Now actually works!
...
) -> PyResult<DEResult>
```
**Benefits**:
- 10-100× speedup for built-in test functions (sphere, Rosenbrock, Rastrigin)
- Useful for benchmarking and testing
- Grid search can be parallelized (no callbacks)
- Foundation for future Rust-only mode
**Effort**: Medium (1-2 hours)
### Priority 2: Implement SHADE (Success-History Adaptive DE)
**Problem**: Current adaptive DE uses basic jDE, SHADE is state-of-the-art
**Solution**: Implement SHADE algorithm from Tanabe & Fukunaga (2013)
**Key Features**:
- Historical memory of successful parameters (F, CR)
- Weighted random selection from memory
- Better than jDE on CEC benchmarks
**Implementation Strategy**:
1. Add `SHADE` variant to `DEStrategy` enum
2. Create success history buffer (circular buffer of size H=10-100)
3. Update memory after each successful mutation
4. Sample (F, CR) from history using Cauchy/Normal distributions
**Code Outline**:
```rust
pub enum DEAdaptive {
None,
JDE, // Current implementation
SHADE, // New: Success-history based
LSHADE, // Future: With linear population reduction
}
struct SHADEMemory {
history_f: Vec<f64>, // Successful F values
history_cr: Vec<f64>, // Successful CR values
index: usize, // Circular buffer index
size: usize, // Memory size H
}
impl SHADEMemory {
fn sample_f(&self) -> f64 {
// Cauchy distribution centered on random history entry
}
fn sample_cr(&self) -> f64 {
// Normal distribution centered on random history entry
}
fn update(&mut self, successful_f: f64, successful_cr: f64) {
// Add to circular buffer
}
}
```
**Benefits**:
- State-of-the-art adaptive control
- Better than jDE empirically
- Aligns with roadmap (v0.3.0)
- Minimal API changes
**Effort**: Medium-High (2-4 hours with testing)
### Priority 3: Time-Series Integration Helpers
**Problem**: Using Polarway + OptimizR requires manual glue code
**Solution**: Create helper functions for common time-series + optimization patterns
**Implementation Strategy**:
1. Add `timeseries_utils` module to OptimizR
2. Functions for common workflows
3. Optional Polarway integration (via feature flag)
**Code Outline**:
```rust
// New module: src/timeseries_utils.rs
/// Prepare time-series data for HMM regime detection
pub fn prepare_for_hmm(
prices: &[f64],
lag_periods: &[usize],
) -> Vec<Vec<f64>> {
// Create features: returns, lagged returns, etc.
}
/// Rolling window risk metrics
pub fn rolling_hurst_exponent(
returns: &[f64],
window_size: usize,
) -> Vec<f64> {
// Compute Hurst exponent in rolling windows
}
/// Backtest parameter optimization
pub fn optimize_strategy_params<F>(
objective_fn: F,
param_bounds: Vec<(f64, f64)>,
n_trials: usize,
) -> DEResult
where F: Fn(&[f64]) -> f64
{
// Wrapper around DE with sensible defaults
}
```
**Python Bindings**:
```python
from optimizr import timeseries_utils as tsu
# Prepare features
features = tsu.prepare_for_hmm(prices, lag_periods=[1, 5, 20])
# Rolling risk metrics
rolling_hurst = tsu.rolling_hurst_exponent(returns, window_size=252)
# Strategy optimization
def my_strategy(params):
# ... backtesting logic ...
return sharpe_ratio
result = tsu.optimize_strategy_params(
my_strategy,
param_bounds=[(1, 50), (0.01, 0.5)],
n_trials=500
)
```
**Benefits**:
- Reduces boilerplate for common use cases
- Makes integration obvious
- Encourages adoption
- Low effort, high value
**Effort**: Low-Medium (1-2 hours)
## Secondary Enhancements (Future Work)
### 4. Multi-Objective Optimization (NSGA-DE)
- **Roadmap**: v0.3.0
- **Use Case**: Portfolio optimization (maximize return, minimize risk)
- **Effort**: High (5-8 hours)
### 5. GPU Acceleration
- **Roadmap**: v0.3.0
- **Use Case**: Massive population sizes (10K-100K individuals)
- **Effort**: Very High (multi-day project)
### 6. Additional Algorithms (PSO, CMA-ES, etc.)
- **Roadmap**: v0.3.0
- **Use Case**: Algorithm portfolio for different problem types
- **Effort**: High per algorithm (3-5 hours each)
## Recommended Implementation Order
1. **Session 1 (Current)**: Time-Series Integration Helpers (1-2 hours)
- Low effort, immediate value
- Makes Polarway + OptimizR integration obvious
- Creates examples for documentation
2. **Session 2**: Enable Rust-Native Parallelization (1-2 hours)
- Unblocks major performance gain
- Grid search parallelization
- Foundation for future work
3. **Session 3**: Implement SHADE (2-4 hours)
- State-of-the-art adaptive DE
- Aligns with roadmap
- Publishable improvement
4. **Future**: Multi-objective, GPU, additional algorithms
- Larger projects
- Requires more research
## Testing Strategy
For each enhancement:
1. **Unit tests**: Algorithm correctness (sphere function, Rosenbrock)
2. **Benchmarks**: Performance comparison (before/after)
3. **Integration tests**: Polarway + OptimizR workflows
4. **Documentation**: Usage examples, API docs
## Git Commit Strategy (per MANDATORY rules)
Each enhancement gets:
1. Feature branch: `feature/shade-algorithm` or `feature/rust-parallelization`
2. Implementation commits with tests
3. Benchmark results documented
4. Final commit: `feat(de): implement SHADE adaptive DE variant`
5. Push to origin
6. Log to historia/
## Success Metrics
1. **Performance**:
- Rust parallelization: 10-100× speedup on multi-core
- SHADE: 10-20% better convergence than jDE on benchmarks
- Time-series helpers: Zero overhead (pure convenience)
2. **Usability**:
- Integration examples in documentation
- Clear API documentation
- Python usage examples
3. **Completeness**:
- All tests passing
- Benchmarks documented
- Changes committed to git
---
**Next Action**: Implement Priority 3 (Time-Series Integration Helpers) as it's lowest effort with immediate value for demonstrating Polarway + OptimizR synergy.