# GPU Backend (PyTorch) This document describes the optional GPU-accelerated backend for **ferro-ta** powered by [PyTorch](https://pytorch.org/). --- ## Goals - Offer a drop-in GPU path for a small subset of indicators (SMA, EMA, RSI) for users who process very large arrays (millions of bars or thousands of symbols in parallel). - Keep the default install CPU-only: no GPU dependency unless the user opts in. - Maintain API transparency: `torch.Tensor` in → `torch.Tensor` out; `numpy.ndarray` in → `numpy.ndarray` out. - Support both **CUDA** (NVIDIA) and **MPS** (Apple Silicon). --- ## Supported Indicators | Indicator | Module | Notes | |---|---|---| | `sma` | `ferro_ta.gpu` | cumsum-based O(n) rolling mean; native PyTorch | | `ema` | `ferro_ta.gpu` | SMA-seeded; recurrence on CPU for numerical fidelity | | `rsi` | `ferro_ta.gpu` | diffs on GPU; Wilder smoothing on CPU | All other ferro-ta indicators fall back to the CPU path automatically when called through the top-level `ferro_ta` namespace. --- ## Installation **Default (CPU-only):** ```bash pip install ferro-ta ``` **With GPU support (PyTorch):** ```bash pip install "ferro-ta[gpu]" ``` This installs `torch>=2.0`. For CUDA or MPS, install the appropriate PyTorch build from [pytorch.org](https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/): ```bash # CUDA 12.x (example) pip install torch --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121 # Apple Silicon (MPS) — often included in default pip install pip install torch ``` --- ## Usage ```python import torch from ferro_ta.gpu import sma, ema, rsi # Build a tensor on GPU (CUDA or MPS on Apple Silicon) close_gpu = torch.tensor( [44.34, 44.09, 44.15, 43.61, 44.33, 44.83, 45.10, 45.15, 43.61, 44.33], device="cuda", # or device="mps" on Apple Silicon dtype=torch.float64, ) # GPU-accelerated SMA — result is also a torch.Tensor sma_out = sma(close_gpu, timeperiod=5) print(type(sma_out)) # print(sma_out.cpu().numpy()) # same values as CPU SMA # RSI on GPU rsi_out = rsi(close_gpu, timeperiod=5) # Fall back to CPU automatically when input is numpy import numpy as np close_cpu = np.array([44.34, 44.09, 44.15, 43.61, 44.33]) sma_cpu = sma(close_cpu, timeperiod=3) print(type(sma_cpu)) # ``` --- ## Limitations 1. **Only 3 indicators supported.** SMA, EMA, RSI. The full set of 160+ indicators falls back to the CPU path. Adding more GPU indicators is planned for future work. 2. **Transfer overhead.** Moving data from CPU RAM to GPU memory and back dominates for small arrays (< ~100k elements). The GPU path is faster only when data is already on the device or for very large arrays. 3. **float64.** PyTorch tensors are supported; dtype conversion is performed automatically for integer inputs. 4. **EMA and RSI recurrence is on CPU.** To guarantee exact Wilder-smoothing parity with the CPU implementation, the recurrence loop runs on the CPU after computing diffs/seeds on the GPU. A future release may implement a fully native GPU kernel. 5. **No OOM handling.** For extremely large arrays the GPU may run out of memory; no graceful fallback is implemented. --- ## Benchmarks Measured on an NVIDIA RTX 3080 (10 GB VRAM) with CUDA 12.2, Python 3.11, PyTorch 2.x. Array size: **1,000,000 elements**. | Indicator | CPU (NumPy/Rust) | GPU (PyTorch) | Speedup | Notes | |---|---|---|---|---| | `sma` (period 30) | 0.4 ms | 0.9 ms | 0.4× | Transfer overhead dominates | | `ema` (period 30) | 0.6 ms | 1.2 ms | 0.5× | Recurrence on CPU; no GPU gain | | `rsi` (period 14) | 1.1 ms | 1.4 ms | 0.8× | Diffs on GPU; recurrence on CPU | > **Key finding:** For 1M-element arrays, the GPU path is **not faster** than the > optimised Rust/CPU path due to the cost of host↔device memory transfers. The GPU > path is most useful when (a) data is already on the GPU, or (b) the same kernel > is launched many times without re-transferring data. The benchmark script is in `benchmarks/bench_gpu.py`. --- ## Future Work - Implement fully native GPU kernels for EMA and RSI to avoid CPU round-trips. - Extend to batch operations (running 1000+ symbols in parallel on GPU). - Add optional RAPIDS cuDF or Polars GPU integration for dataframe-level workflows.