mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-11-02 07:26:12 +00:00
Miha Kralj
813e9451e6
Bug, indicator-request, and validation-mismatch forms, plus a Q&A discussion link.
45 lines
1.5 KiB
YAML
45 lines
1.5 KiB
YAML
name: Validation mismatch
|
|
description: Report where QuanTAlib disagrees with a reference library or paper
|
|
title: "[Validation] "
|
|
labels: [bug, validation]
|
|
body:
|
|
- type: markdown
|
|
attributes:
|
|
value: |
|
|
Every indicator is cross-checked against TA-Lib, Tulip, Skender, and Pandas-TA. If you found a case where we disagree, capture the exact input and the two outputs.
|
|
- type: input
|
|
id: indicator
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Indicator
|
|
description: Which indicator disagrees, and with what settings?
|
|
placeholder: "e.g. Hull moving average, period 14"
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
- type: input
|
|
id: reference
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Reference
|
|
description: The library or paper you compared against, and its version.
|
|
placeholder: "e.g. TA-Lib 0.4.0 / Skender 2.x / the original paper"
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: input-series
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Input series
|
|
description: The input used for both implementations.
|
|
placeholder: "prices = [100, 101, 99, 103, ...]"
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: mismatch
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Disagreement
|
|
description: The values from QuanTAlib vs the reference, and the index where they first diverge.
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: notes
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Notes
|
|
description: Anything about warm-up conventions, precision, or methodology that might explain the gap. |