8.3 KiB
SMA: Simple Moving Average
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Trend (FIR MA) |
| Inputs | Source (close) |
| Parameters | period |
| Outputs | Single series (Sma) |
| Output range | Tracks input |
| Warmup | period bars |
| Signature | sma_signature |
TL;DR
- The Simple Moving Average (SMA) is the unweighted arithmetic mean of the last
Ndata points. - Parameterized by
period. - Output range: Tracks input.
- Requires
periodbars of warmup before first valid output (IsHot = true). - Validated against TA-Lib, Skender, and Tulip reference implementations where available.
"The vanilla ice cream of technical analysis. Boring, ubiquitous, and the only thing your grandfather and your high-frequency trading bot agree on."
The Simple Moving Average (SMA) is the unweighted arithmetic mean of the last N data points. It acts as a low-pass filter, smoothing out high-frequency noise to reveal the underlying trend. While conceptually simple, efficient implementation on modern hardware requires careful attention to memory access patterns and vectorization.
Historical Context
The concept of a moving average dates back to 1901 (R.H. Hooker) for smoothing weather data, but it became a staple of financial analysis in the mid-20th century. It is the baseline against which all other averages are compared.
Architecture & Physics
The naive implementation of SMA sums N numbers at every step, resulting in O(N) complexity. QuanTAlib uses an optimized O(1) approach.
O(1) Running Sum
A running Sum and a RingBuffer of history are maintained.
Sum_{new} = Sum_{old} - Value_{oldest} + Value_{new}
SMA = \frac{Sum_{new}}{N}
This ensures that calculating an SMA(200) takes the exact same time as an SMA(10).
Drift Correction
Floating-point addition is not associative. Repeatedly adding and subtracting values from a running sum introduces cumulative error (drift) over millions of ticks. QuanTAlib implements a periodic Resync mechanism (every 1000 ticks) that recalculates the sum from scratch to ensure precision remains within 1e-9 of the true mean.
SIMD Optimization
For batch processing of large datasets, Sma.Batch utilizes System.Runtime.Intrinsics (AVX2/AVX-512) to process multiple data points in parallel, significantly outperforming scalar loops.
Mathematical Foundation
1. The Mean
SMA_t = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=0}^{N-1} P_{t-i}
Performance Profile
Operation Count (Streaming Mode, O(1) Running Sum)
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUB (Sum - oldest) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ADD (Sum + newest) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DIV (Sum / N) | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Total (hot) | 3 | — | ~17 cycles |
Every 1000 bars, a resync recalculates the sum to prevent drift:
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADD (N values) | N | 1 | N |
| DIV (Sum / N) | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Resync cost | N+1 | — | ~N+15 cycles |
Amortized cost: ~17 + (N+15)/1000 ≈ ~17 cycles/bar for typical use.
Batch Mode (SIMD Analysis)
SMA batch processing is highly vectorizable using running sum + prefix sum techniques:
| Operation | Scalar Ops | SIMD Ops (AVX2) | Speedup |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial N-sum | N | N/8 | 8× |
| Running update (per bar) | 3 | ~1 | ~3× |
| Division | 1 | 1/8 (batched) | 8× |
For 512 bars:
| Mode | Cycles/bar | Total | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scalar streaming | ~17 | ~8,700 | O(1) per bar |
| SIMD batch | ~3 | ~1,500 | Vectorized running sum |
| Improvement | 5.8× | — | Batch wins for large N |
Quality Metrics
| Metric | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 10/10 | Exact arithmetic mean |
| Timeliness | 3/10 | Significant lag (~N/2 bars) |
| Overshoot | 10/10 | Never overshoots input range |
| Smoothness | 5/10 | Smooth but susceptible to drop-off jumps |
Benchmark Results
| Metric | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Throughput | ~100M bars/sec | SIMD batch mode |
| Allocations | 0 bytes | Zero-allocation in hot paths |
| Complexity | O(1) | Constant time regardless of period N |
| State Size | 8 + 8N bytes | Sum + RingBuffer |
Validation
| Library | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| TA-Lib | ✅ | Matches TA_SMA exactly. |
| Skender | ✅ | Matches GetSma exactly. |
| Tulip | ✅ | Matches sma exactly. |
| Ooples | ✅ | Matches CalculateSimpleMovingAverage. |
C# Implementation Considerations
RingBuffer for O(1) Running Sum
The implementation maintains a RingBuffer of the most recent N values alongside a running Sum. On each update, the oldest value is subtracted and the newest added—eliminating the need to iterate over the entire window:
Sum = Math.FusedMultiplyAdd(-_buffer[^1], 1, Sum + p);
_buffer.Add(p, isNew);
Using FusedMultiplyAdd for the combined subtraction/addition improves numerical stability compared to separate operations.
State Record Struct
Minimal state is captured in a record struct for efficient bar correction:
private record struct State(double Sum, double LastValidValue, int TickCount);
When isNew=false, the implementation restores _p_state to revert any partial calculation—enabling accurate bar correction when the same timestamp updates multiple times.
Periodic Resync for Drift Correction
Floating-point drift accumulates over millions of additions/subtractions. The implementation resyncs every 1000 ticks:
if (_state.TickCount >= ResyncPeriod)
{
_state = _state with { Sum = _buffer.Span.Sum(), TickCount = 0 };
}
This bounds cumulative error to within 1e-9 of true mean regardless of stream length.
Multi-Architecture SIMD Implementation
The static Calculate method dispatches to architecture-specific implementations:
if (Avx512F.IsSupported) CalculateAvx512Core(source, output, period);
else if (Avx2.IsSupported) CalculateAvx2Core(source, output, period);
else if (AdvSimd.Arm64.IsSupported) CalculateNeonCore(source, output, period);
else CalculateScalarCore(source, output, period);
- AVX-512: Processes 8 doubles simultaneously with 512-bit vectors
- AVX2: Processes 4 doubles with 256-bit vectors
- NEON (ARM64): Processes 2 doubles with 128-bit vectors
- Scalar fallback: Portable loop for unsupported architectures
Prefix-Sum Vectorization
For batch processing, the SIMD paths use a prefix-sum technique that enables parallel computation of running sums. The initial window sum is computed with vectorized horizontal addition, then subsequent values use the optimized running-sum pattern.
ArrayPool for Memory Efficiency
Large period buffers are rented from ArrayPool<double> rather than allocated, reducing GC pressure during batch operations. Combined with stackalloc for small intermediate buffers, this achieves zero-allocation in hot paths.
NaN Handling with Last-Valid Substitution
Non-finite inputs are replaced with the last valid value stored in state:
p = double.IsFinite(p) ? p : _state.LastValidValue;
This prevents NaN propagation through the running sum without requiring expensive validation on every buffer access.
Memory Layout
| Component | Size | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
_buffer (RingBuffer) |
32 + 8×period bytes | Sliding window history |
_state |
~24 bytes | Sum, LastValidValue, TickCount |
_p_state |
~24 bytes | Previous state for rollback |
| Scalars | ~16 bytes | Period, reciprocal |
| Total | ~96 + 8N bytes | Per-instance footprint |
For SMA(200), total memory is approximately 1.7 KB per instance.
Common Pitfalls
- Lag: SMA has the most lag of all moving averages (Lag
\approx N/2). - Drop-off Effect: An old, large outlier dropping out of the window causes the SMA to jump, even if the current price is flat. This "Barker effect" is why EMAs are often preferred.
- NaN Handling: A single
NaNin the history window corrupts the entire SMA. QuanTAlib handles this by substituting the last valid value.