mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-08-03 11:47:44 +00:00
060649192f
- Remove 'C# Implementation Considerations' sections from 34 indicator .md files - Delete 29 temp PowerShell scripts (_fix_mojibake.ps1, _hex_scan.ps1, etc.) - Move test files into tests/ subdirectories for consistent project structure - Add trader-focused bullet points to indicator documentation
648 lines
18 KiB
C#
648 lines
18 KiB
C#
namespace QuanTAlib.Test;
|
|
|
|
using Xunit;
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validation tests for HLV (High-Low Volatility / Parkinson Volatility).
|
|
/// HLV is a range-based volatility estimator using only High-Low prices.
|
|
/// Formula: parkinsonEstimator = (1/(4*ln(2))) * (lnH - lnL)²
|
|
/// RMA smoothing with bias correction applied.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
public class HlvValidationTests
|
|
{
|
|
private static TBarSeries GenerateTestData(int count = 100)
|
|
{
|
|
var gbm = new GBM(seed: 42);
|
|
return gbm.Fetch(count, DateTime.UtcNow.Ticks, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// === Mathematical Validation ===
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates the Parkinson coefficient: 1/(4*ln(2)) ≈ 0.36067376
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_ParkinsonCoefficient_IsCorrect()
|
|
{
|
|
double expectedCoeff = 1.0 / (4.0 * Math.Log(2));
|
|
Assert.Equal(0.36067376022224085, expectedCoeff, 10);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates RMA decay formula: decay = 1 - (1/period)
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Theory]
|
|
[InlineData(14, 0.928571428571429)] // 1 - 1/14 = 13/14
|
|
[InlineData(20, 0.95)] // 1 - 1/20 = 19/20
|
|
[InlineData(10, 0.9)] // 1 - 1/10 = 9/10
|
|
public void Hlv_RmaDecay_IsCorrect(int period, double expectedDecay)
|
|
{
|
|
double decay = 1.0 - 1.0 / period;
|
|
Assert.Equal(expectedDecay, decay, 10);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates Parkinson estimator formula: (1/(4*ln(2))) * (lnH - lnL)²
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_ParkinsonEstimatorFormula_IsCorrect()
|
|
{
|
|
double high = 105.0;
|
|
double low = 95.0;
|
|
|
|
double lnH = Math.Log(high);
|
|
double lnL = Math.Log(low);
|
|
|
|
double coeff = 1.0 / (4.0 * Math.Log(2));
|
|
double expectedPk = coeff * Math.Pow(lnH - lnL, 2);
|
|
|
|
// Manual calculation
|
|
// lnH - lnL = ln(105/95) ≈ 0.1001
|
|
// (lnH - lnL)² ≈ 0.01002
|
|
// coeff ≈ 0.36067
|
|
// Pk ≈ 0.36067 * 0.01002 ≈ 0.00361
|
|
|
|
Assert.True(expectedPk > 0, "Parkinson estimator should be positive for bars with range");
|
|
Assert.True(expectedPk < 0.1, "Parkinson estimator should be small for 10% range");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates that flat bar (H=L) produces zero Parkinson estimator.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_FlatBar_ProducesZeroPk()
|
|
{
|
|
double price = 100.0;
|
|
double lnH = Math.Log(price);
|
|
double lnL = Math.Log(price);
|
|
|
|
double coeff = 1.0 / (4.0 * Math.Log(2));
|
|
double pk = coeff * Math.Pow(lnH - lnL, 2); // 0
|
|
|
|
Assert.Equal(0.0, pk, 15);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates bias correction formula: corrected = raw / (1 - decay^n)
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Theory]
|
|
[InlineData(14, 5)] // Early in warmup
|
|
[InlineData(14, 14)] // At warmup
|
|
[InlineData(14, 50)] // Well past warmup
|
|
[InlineData(14, 100)] // Very late - correction should be minimal
|
|
public void Hlv_BiasCorrection_WorksCorrectly(int period, int count)
|
|
{
|
|
double decay = 1.0 - 1.0 / period;
|
|
double e = Math.Pow(decay, count);
|
|
double correctionFactor = 1.0 / (1.0 - e);
|
|
|
|
// Early: large correction needed
|
|
// Later: correction approaches 1.0
|
|
if (count < period)
|
|
{
|
|
Assert.True(correctionFactor > 1.05, "Early values should need significant correction");
|
|
}
|
|
else if (count > period * 5)
|
|
{
|
|
Assert.True(correctionFactor < 1.01, "Very late values should need minimal correction");
|
|
}
|
|
else if (count > period * 2)
|
|
{
|
|
Assert.True(correctionFactor < 1.1, "Late values should need small correction");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates annualization factor: √(annualPeriods)
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Theory]
|
|
[InlineData(252, 15.8745078663875)] // Daily trading days
|
|
[InlineData(365, 19.1049731745428)] // Calendar days
|
|
[InlineData(52, 7.21110255092798)] // Weekly
|
|
[InlineData(12, 3.46410161513775)] // Monthly
|
|
public void Hlv_AnnualizationFactor_IsCorrect(int annualPeriods, double expectedFactor)
|
|
{
|
|
double factor = Math.Sqrt(annualPeriods);
|
|
Assert.Equal(expectedFactor, factor, 10);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates that wider range produces higher Parkinson estimator.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_WiderRange_ProducesHigherPk()
|
|
{
|
|
// Narrow range bar
|
|
double narrowPk = ComputeParkinsonEstimator(101, 99);
|
|
|
|
// Wide range bar
|
|
double widePk = ComputeParkinsonEstimator(110, 90);
|
|
|
|
Assert.True(widePk > narrowPk,
|
|
"Wider range should produce higher Parkinson estimator");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates that HLV only uses High-Low (ignores Open-Close).
|
|
/// Same H-L range with different O-C should produce identical results.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_OnlyUsesHighLow_IgnoresOpenClose()
|
|
{
|
|
var hlv1 = new Hlv(14, annualize: false);
|
|
var hlv2 = new Hlv(14, annualize: false);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
// Same high/low range but different open/close
|
|
// Indicator 1: doji pattern (open = close)
|
|
var bar1 = new TBar(
|
|
DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(i).Ticks,
|
|
100.0, 105.0, 95.0, 100.0, 1000.0
|
|
);
|
|
hlv1.Update(bar1);
|
|
|
|
// Indicator 2: directional move (open != close)
|
|
var bar2 = new TBar(
|
|
DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(i).Ticks,
|
|
98.0, 105.0, 95.0, 104.0, 1000.0
|
|
);
|
|
hlv2.Update(bar2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// HLV should be identical since H-L range is the same
|
|
Assert.Equal(hlv1.Last.Value, hlv2.Last.Value, 10);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// === Consistency Tests ===
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates streaming and batch produce identical results.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_StreamingMatchesBatch()
|
|
{
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(100);
|
|
|
|
// Streaming calculation
|
|
var streamingHlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
streamingHlv.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Batch calculation
|
|
var batchResult = Hlv.Batch(bars, 14);
|
|
|
|
// Compare last values
|
|
Assert.Equal(batchResult.Last.Value, streamingHlv.Last.Value, 8);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates TBarSeries input matches TBar streaming.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_TBarSeriesInput_MatchesStreaming()
|
|
{
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(100);
|
|
|
|
// Streaming
|
|
var streamingHlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
streamingHlv.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TBarSeries batch
|
|
var batchHlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
var batchResult = batchHlv.Update(bars);
|
|
|
|
Assert.Equal(batchResult.Last.Value, streamingHlv.Last.Value, 10);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates Span batch matches streaming.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_SpanBatch_MatchesStreaming()
|
|
{
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(100);
|
|
|
|
// Streaming
|
|
var streamingHlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
streamingHlv.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Extract H-L arrays
|
|
var highs = new double[bars.Count];
|
|
var lows = new double[bars.Count];
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
highs[i] = bars[i].High;
|
|
lows[i] = bars[i].Low;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Span batch
|
|
var output = new double[bars.Count];
|
|
Hlv.Batch(highs, lows, output, 14);
|
|
|
|
Assert.Equal(output[^1], streamingHlv.Last.Value, 10);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates annualized output is scaled correctly.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_Annualized_ScaledCorrectly()
|
|
{
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(50);
|
|
|
|
// Non-annualized
|
|
var hlvRaw = new Hlv(14, annualize: false);
|
|
|
|
// Annualized (default 252 periods)
|
|
var hlvAnn = new Hlv(14, annualize: true, annualPeriods: 252);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
hlvRaw.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
hlvAnn.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
double expectedRatio = Math.Sqrt(252);
|
|
double actualRatio = hlvAnn.Last.Value / hlvRaw.Last.Value;
|
|
|
|
Assert.Equal(expectedRatio, actualRatio, 6);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// === Parameter Sensitivity ===
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates shorter period produces more responsive volatility.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_ShorterPeriod_MoreResponsive()
|
|
{
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(50);
|
|
|
|
var hlvShort = new Hlv(5);
|
|
var hlvLong = new Hlv(20);
|
|
|
|
var shortResults = new List<double>();
|
|
var longResults = new List<double>();
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
hlvShort.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
hlvLong.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
|
|
if (hlvShort.IsHot && hlvLong.IsHot)
|
|
{
|
|
shortResults.Add(hlvShort.Last.Value);
|
|
longResults.Add(hlvLong.Last.Value);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Shorter period should have higher variance in results
|
|
double shortVar = Variance(shortResults);
|
|
double longVar = Variance(longResults);
|
|
|
|
Assert.True(shortResults.Count > 0, "Should have hot results");
|
|
Assert.True(shortVar > longVar * 0.5,
|
|
"Shorter period should generally be more variable");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates different periods produce different results.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_DifferentPeriods_ProduceDifferentResults()
|
|
{
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(50);
|
|
|
|
var hlv10 = new Hlv(10);
|
|
var hlv14 = new Hlv(14);
|
|
var hlv20 = new Hlv(20);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
hlv10.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
hlv14.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
hlv20.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Assert.NotEqual(hlv10.Last.Value, hlv14.Last.Value);
|
|
Assert.NotEqual(hlv14.Last.Value, hlv20.Last.Value);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// === Edge Cases ===
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates handling of very small ranges (tight consolidation).
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_VerySmallRanges_HandledCorrectly()
|
|
{
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
var bar = new TBar(
|
|
DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(i).Ticks,
|
|
100.0, 100.001, 99.999, 100.0, 1000.0
|
|
);
|
|
hlv.Update(bar);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Assert.True(double.IsFinite(hlv.Last.Value));
|
|
Assert.True(hlv.Last.Value >= 0, "Volatility should be non-negative");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates handling of very large ranges (high volatility).
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_VeryLargeRanges_HandledCorrectly()
|
|
{
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
var bar = new TBar(
|
|
DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(i).Ticks,
|
|
100.0, 200.0, 50.0, 150.0, 1000.0
|
|
);
|
|
hlv.Update(bar);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Assert.True(double.IsFinite(hlv.Last.Value));
|
|
Assert.True(hlv.Last.Value > 0, "High volatility should produce positive value");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates handling of constant bars (zero volatility).
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_ConstantBars_ProducesMinimalVolatility()
|
|
{
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
var bar = new TBar(
|
|
DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(i).Ticks,
|
|
100.0, 100.0, 100.0, 100.0, 1000.0
|
|
);
|
|
hlv.Update(bar);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Assert.True(double.IsFinite(hlv.Last.Value));
|
|
Assert.True(hlv.Last.Value < 0.001, "Constant price should produce near-zero volatility");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates warmup period calculation.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Theory]
|
|
[InlineData(10)]
|
|
[InlineData(14)]
|
|
[InlineData(20)]
|
|
public void Hlv_WarmupPeriod_IsCorrect(int period)
|
|
{
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(period);
|
|
Assert.Equal(period, hlv.WarmupPeriod);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates output is always non-negative (volatility property).
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_Output_IsNonNegative()
|
|
{
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(100);
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
hlv.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
if (hlv.IsHot)
|
|
{
|
|
Assert.True(hlv.Last.Value >= 0,
|
|
$"Volatility should be non-negative at bar {i}");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates bar correction works correctly.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_BarCorrection_WorksCorrectly()
|
|
{
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(30);
|
|
|
|
// Feed initial bars
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
hlv.Update(bars[i], isNew: true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add new bar
|
|
hlv.Update(bars[20], isNew: true);
|
|
double afterNew = hlv.Last.Value;
|
|
|
|
// Correct with different bar (much higher volatility)
|
|
var correctedBar = new TBar(
|
|
bars[20].Time,
|
|
100, 200, 50, 150, 1000
|
|
);
|
|
hlv.Update(correctedBar, isNew: false);
|
|
double afterCorrection = hlv.Last.Value;
|
|
|
|
// Restore original
|
|
hlv.Update(bars[20], isNew: false);
|
|
double afterRestore = hlv.Last.Value;
|
|
|
|
Assert.NotEqual(afterNew, afterCorrection);
|
|
Assert.Equal(afterNew, afterRestore, 10);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates iterative corrections converge to same result.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_IterativeCorrections_Converge()
|
|
{
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(30);
|
|
|
|
// Feed bars and make corrections
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
hlv.Update(bars[i], isNew: true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Multiple corrections on same bar
|
|
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
|
|
{
|
|
var tempBar = new TBar(
|
|
bars[19].Time,
|
|
100 + j, 110 + j, 90 + j, 105 + j, 1000
|
|
);
|
|
hlv.Update(tempBar, isNew: false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Final correction back to original
|
|
hlv.Update(bars[19], isNew: false);
|
|
double afterCorrections = hlv.Last.Value;
|
|
|
|
// Fresh calculation
|
|
var hlvFresh = new Hlv(14);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
hlvFresh.Update(bars[i], isNew: true);
|
|
}
|
|
double freshValue = hlvFresh.Last.Value;
|
|
|
|
Assert.Equal(freshValue, afterCorrections, 10);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// === Comparison with Theoretical Properties ===
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates HLV stability over repeated runs with same seed.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_Stability_ConsistentOverRepeatedRuns()
|
|
{
|
|
// Multiple runs with same seed should produce identical results
|
|
var results = new List<double>();
|
|
|
|
for (int run = 0; run < 3; run++)
|
|
{
|
|
var gbm = new GBM(seed: 42);
|
|
var bars = gbm.Fetch(100, DateTime.UtcNow.Ticks, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1));
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(14);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
hlv.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
results.Add(hlv.Last.Value);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// All runs should be identical
|
|
Assert.Equal(results[0], results[1], 15);
|
|
Assert.Equal(results[1], results[2], 15);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates HLV responds to volatility regime changes.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_RespondsToVolatilityRegimeChange()
|
|
{
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(10);
|
|
|
|
// Low volatility regime
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
var bar = new TBar(
|
|
DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(i).Ticks,
|
|
100.0, 101.0, 99.0, 100.0, 1000.0 // 2% range
|
|
);
|
|
hlv.Update(bar);
|
|
}
|
|
double lowVolValue = hlv.Last.Value;
|
|
|
|
// High volatility regime
|
|
for (int i = 20; i < 40; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
var bar = new TBar(
|
|
DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(i).Ticks,
|
|
100.0, 110.0, 90.0, 100.0, 1000.0 // 20% range
|
|
);
|
|
hlv.Update(bar);
|
|
}
|
|
double highVolValue = hlv.Last.Value;
|
|
|
|
Assert.True(highVolValue > lowVolValue * 2,
|
|
"HLV should significantly increase with higher volatility regime");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates HLV vs GKV: same range, HLV ignores O-C while GKV uses it.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_VsGkv_DifferentBehavior()
|
|
{
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(14, annualize: false);
|
|
var gkv = new Gkv(14, annualize: false);
|
|
|
|
// Same bars
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
// Directional bar (O != C)
|
|
var bar = new TBar(
|
|
DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(i).Ticks,
|
|
100.0, 105.0, 95.0, 104.0, 1000.0
|
|
);
|
|
hlv.Update(bar);
|
|
gkv.Update(bar);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Both should produce positive values
|
|
Assert.True(hlv.Last.Value > 0);
|
|
Assert.True(gkv.Last.Value > 0);
|
|
|
|
// They should be different since GKV uses O-C term
|
|
Assert.NotEqual(hlv.Last.Value, gkv.Last.Value);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// === Efficiency Comparison ===
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Validates Parkinson efficiency factor is approximately 5.2x close-to-close.
|
|
/// This is a theoretical property - we just verify HLV produces reasonable values.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Hlv_ProducesReasonableVolatilityEstimate()
|
|
{
|
|
var bars = GenerateTestData(100);
|
|
var hlv = new Hlv(14, annualize: false);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < bars.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
hlv.Update(bars[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// HLV should be positive and finite
|
|
Assert.True(double.IsFinite(hlv.Last.Value));
|
|
Assert.True(hlv.Last.Value > 0);
|
|
Assert.True(hlv.Last.Value < 10, "Raw volatility should be reasonable (< 1000%)");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// === Helper Methods ===
|
|
|
|
private static double ComputeParkinsonEstimator(double high, double low)
|
|
{
|
|
double lnH = Math.Log(high);
|
|
double lnL = Math.Log(low);
|
|
double coeff = 1.0 / (4.0 * Math.Log(2));
|
|
return coeff * Math.Pow(lnH - lnL, 2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private static double Variance(List<double> values)
|
|
{
|
|
if (values.Count == 0)
|
|
{
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
double mean = values.Average();
|
|
return values.Average(v => Math.Pow(v - mean, 2));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|