4.8 KiB
RMA: Running Moving Average
Wilder didn't like standard EMA weighting. He wanted history to decay slower. So he invented RMA, which is just EMA with a different alpha, confusing traders for 40 years.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Trend (IIR MA) |
| Inputs | Source (close) |
| Parameters | period |
| Outputs | Single series (Rma) |
| Output range | Tracks input |
| Warmup | ema.WarmupPeriod bars |
| PineScript | rma.pine |
| Signature | rma_signature |
- The Running Moving Average (RMA), also known as the Smoothed Moving Average (SMMA) or Wilder's Moving Average, is the backbone of J.
- Similar: SMMA, MMA | Complementary: RSI/ATR | Trading note: Running MA (identical to SMMA); Wilders original smoothing method.
- Validated against TA-Lib, Skender, and Tulip reference implementations where available.
The Running Moving Average (RMA), also known as the Smoothed Moving Average (SMMA) or Wilder's Moving Average, is the backbone of J. Welles Wilder's most famous indicators: RSI, ATR, and ADX. It is functionally identical to an Exponential Moving Average (EMA), but with a smoothing factor (\alpha) of 1/N instead of 2/(N+1). This results in a longer "memory" and slower decay than a standard EMA of the same period.
Historical Context
Introduced by J. Welles Wilder Jr. in his seminal 1978 book, New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems. Wilder developed his systems on a programmable calculator (the HP-67), where memory was scarce. The RMA allowed him to update averages without storing a history buffer, using a simple recursive formula. It remains the standard smoothing method for RSI and ATR.
Architecture & Physics
RMA is an infinite impulse response (IIR) filter. In QuanTAlib, Rma is implemented as a zero-cost wrapper around the Ema class. It simply instantiates an Ema with a modified alpha.
The Alpha Confusion
Traders often confuse RMA and EMA.
- EMA:
\alpha = \frac{2}{N+1} - RMA:
\alpha = \frac{1}{N}
An RMA of period 14 is mathematically equivalent to an EMA of period 27 (2N-1).
Mathematical Foundation
The recursive formula is identical to EMA, differing only in the weight.
1. Smoothing Factor
\alpha = \frac{1}{N}
2. Recursive Update
RMA_t = \alpha \cdot P_t + (1 - \alpha) \cdot RMA_{t-1}
Which simplifies to the classic Wilder formula:
RMA_t = \frac{P_t + (N-1) \cdot RMA_{t-1}}{N}
Performance Profile
Operation Count (Streaming Mode)
RMA is implemented as a zero-cost wrapper around EMA with modified alpha (\alpha = 1/N vs 2/(N+1)). The operation count is identical to EMA:
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|---|
| FMA | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| MUL | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Total (hot) | 2 | — | ~7 cycles |
During warmup (first ~3N bars), additional operations:
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUL | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| SUB | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DIV | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| CMP | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Warmup overhead | 5 | — | ~21 cycles |
Total during warmup: ~28 cycles/bar; Post-warmup: ~7 cycles/bar.
Quality Metrics
| Metric | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 9/10 | Standard for RSI/ATR calculations |
| Timeliness | 6/10 | Slower than EMA (longer decay) |
| Overshoot | 9/10 | Very stable on reversals |
| Smoothness | 9/10 | Excellent noise rejection |
Benchmark Results
| Metric | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Throughput | ~2 ns/bar | Same as EMA (wrapper overhead negligible) |
| Allocations | 0 bytes | Stack-based calculations only |
| Complexity | O(1) | Constant time update |
| State Size | 32 bytes | Two doubles (RMA, compensator) |
Validation
Validated against Skender and Ooples.
| Library | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Skender | ✅ | Matches GetSmma |
| Ooples | ✅ | Matches CalculateWellesWilderMovingAverage |
| TA-Lib | N/A | Not implemented |
| Tulip | N/A | Not implemented. |
Common Pitfalls
- Initialization: Like EMA, RMA requires a "warmup" period to converge. Wilder often initialized with a Simple Moving Average (SMA) of the first
Nbars. QuanTAlib follows this convention. - Naming: Often called SMMA (Smoothed Moving Average) in other libraries.
- Period Mismatch: Using an EMA(14) where an RMA(14) is expected will result in a much faster-moving line (equivalent to RMA(7.5)).