Files
Miha Kralj 060649192f docs: remove C# Implementation Considerations sections, clean up temp scripts, reorganize test files
- Remove 'C# Implementation Considerations' sections from 34 indicator .md files
- Delete 29 temp PowerShell scripts (_fix_mojibake.ps1, _hex_scan.ps1, etc.)
- Move test files into tests/ subdirectories for consistent project structure
- Add trader-focused bullet points to indicator documentation
2026-03-12 12:34:16 -07:00

193 lines
6.4 KiB
C#

using Skender.Stock.Indicators;
using TALib;
using Xunit.Abstractions;
namespace QuanTAlib.Tests;
public sealed class DemaValidationTests : IDisposable
{
private readonly ValidationTestData _testData;
private readonly ITestOutputHelper _output;
private bool _disposed;
public DemaValidationTests(ITestOutputHelper output)
{
_output = output;
_testData = new ValidationTestData();
}
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
}
private void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (_disposed)
{
return;
}
_disposed = true;
if (disposing)
{
_testData?.Dispose();
}
}
[Fact]
public void Validate_Skender_Batch()
{
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 };
foreach (var period in periods)
{
// Calculate QuanTAlib DEMA (batch TSeries)
var dema = new global::QuanTAlib.Dema(period);
var qResult = dema.Update(_testData.Data);
// Calculate Skender DEMA
var sResult = _testData.SkenderQuotes.GetDema(period).ToList();
// Compare last 100 records
ValidationHelper.VerifyData(qResult, sResult, (s) => s.Dema);
}
_output.WriteLine("DEMA Batch(TSeries) validated successfully against Skender.Stock.Indicators");
}
[Fact]
public void Validate_Talib_Batch()
{
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 };
// Prepare data for TA-Lib (double[])
double[] tData = _testData.RawData.ToArray();
double[] output = new double[tData.Length];
foreach (var period in periods)
{
// Calculate QuanTAlib DEMA (batch TSeries)
var dema = new global::QuanTAlib.Dema(period);
var qResult = dema.Update(_testData.Data);
// Calculate TA-Lib DEMA
var retCode = TALib.Functions.Dema<double>(tData, 0..^0, output, out var outRange, period);
Assert.Equal(TALib.Core.RetCode.Success, retCode);
int lookback = TALib.Functions.DemaLookback(period);
// Compare last 100 records
ValidationHelper.VerifyData(qResult, output, outRange, lookback);
}
_output.WriteLine("DEMA Batch(TSeries) validated successfully against TA-Lib");
}
[Fact]
public void Validate_Tulip_Batch()
{
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 };
// Prepare data for Tulip (double[])
double[] tData = _testData.RawData.ToArray();
foreach (var period in periods)
{
// Calculate QuanTAlib DEMA (batch TSeries)
var dema = new global::QuanTAlib.Dema(period);
var qResult = dema.Update(_testData.Data);
// Calculate Tulip DEMA
var demaIndicator = Tulip.Indicators.dema;
double[][] inputs = { tData };
double[] options = { period };
// Tulip DEMA lookback is usually period-1 for EMA, but DEMA is 2*EMA - EMA(EMA)
// Let's rely on the output length to align.
// Tulip DEMA lookback is same as EMA lookback? No, it involves double smoothing.
// Actually, Tulip's DEMA implementation might have a specific lookback.
// We'll calculate it based on output length.
// Tulip.Indicators.dema.Run expects outputs to be sized correctly.
// We'll use a large buffer and resize if needed, or just calculate lookback.
// For DEMA(n), lookback is roughly n-1 (same as EMA).
// Wait, DEMA uses EMA(EMA), so it might be 2*(n-1)?
// Let's try with n-1 first, if it fails we adjust.
// Actually, TA-Lib DEMA lookback is 2*(period-1).
// Let's assume Tulip is similar.
int lookback = 2 * (period - 1);
double[][] outputs = { new double[tData.Length - lookback] };
demaIndicator.Run(inputs, options, outputs);
var tResult = outputs[0];
// Compare last 100 records
ValidationHelper.VerifyData(qResult, tResult, lookback);
}
_output.WriteLine("DEMA Batch(TSeries) validated successfully against Tulip");
}
[Fact]
public void Validate_Talib_Span()
{
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 };
// Prepare data
double[] sourceData = _testData.RawData.ToArray();
double[] talibOutput = new double[sourceData.Length];
foreach (var period in periods)
{
// Calculate QuanTAlib DEMA (Span API)
double[] qOutput = new double[sourceData.Length];
global::QuanTAlib.Dema.Batch(sourceData.AsSpan(), qOutput.AsSpan(), period);
// Calculate TA-Lib DEMA
var retCode = TALib.Functions.Dema<double>(sourceData, 0..^0, talibOutput, out var outRange, period);
Assert.Equal(TALib.Core.RetCode.Success, retCode);
int lookback = TALib.Functions.DemaLookback(period);
// Compare last 100 records
ValidationHelper.VerifyData(qOutput, talibOutput, outRange, lookback);
}
_output.WriteLine("DEMA Span validated successfully against TA-Lib");
}
[Fact]
public void Validate_Against_Ooples()
{
// Ooples Finance implementation of DEMA is standard:
// DEMA = 2 * EMA(n) - EMA(EMA(n))
// We validate that our Dema class matches this composition using our own Ema class.
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 14, 20 };
foreach (var period in periods)
{
var dema = new Dema(period);
var ema1 = new Ema(period);
var ema2 = new Ema(period);
for (int i = 0; i < _testData.Data.Count; i++)
{
var item = _testData.Data[i];
// QuanTAlib DEMA
var qVal = dema.Update(item);
// Manual DEMA (Ooples logic)
var e1 = ema1.Update(item);
var e2 = ema2.Update(e1); // EMA of EMA
double ooplesVal = 2 * e1.Value - e2.Value;
// Compare
// Note: There might be tiny differences due to floating point operations order
// or internal state handling optimization in Dema class vs composed Ema classes.
Assert.Equal(ooplesVal, qVal.Value, ValidationHelper.DefaultTolerance);
}
}
_output.WriteLine("DEMA validated successfully against Ooples logic (2*EMA - EMA(EMA))");
}
}