mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-08-02 19:37:43 +00:00
060649192f
- Remove 'C# Implementation Considerations' sections from 34 indicator .md files - Delete 29 temp PowerShell scripts (_fix_mojibake.ps1, _hex_scan.ps1, etc.) - Move test files into tests/ subdirectories for consistent project structure - Add trader-focused bullet points to indicator documentation
193 lines
6.4 KiB
C#
193 lines
6.4 KiB
C#
using Skender.Stock.Indicators;
|
|
using TALib;
|
|
using Xunit.Abstractions;
|
|
|
|
namespace QuanTAlib.Tests;
|
|
|
|
public sealed class DemaValidationTests : IDisposable
|
|
{
|
|
private readonly ValidationTestData _testData;
|
|
private readonly ITestOutputHelper _output;
|
|
private bool _disposed;
|
|
|
|
public DemaValidationTests(ITestOutputHelper output)
|
|
{
|
|
_output = output;
|
|
_testData = new ValidationTestData();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public void Dispose()
|
|
{
|
|
Dispose(true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private void Dispose(bool disposing)
|
|
{
|
|
if (_disposed)
|
|
{
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_disposed = true;
|
|
|
|
if (disposing)
|
|
{
|
|
_testData?.Dispose();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Validate_Skender_Batch()
|
|
{
|
|
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 };
|
|
|
|
foreach (var period in periods)
|
|
{
|
|
// Calculate QuanTAlib DEMA (batch TSeries)
|
|
var dema = new global::QuanTAlib.Dema(period);
|
|
var qResult = dema.Update(_testData.Data);
|
|
|
|
// Calculate Skender DEMA
|
|
var sResult = _testData.SkenderQuotes.GetDema(period).ToList();
|
|
|
|
// Compare last 100 records
|
|
ValidationHelper.VerifyData(qResult, sResult, (s) => s.Dema);
|
|
}
|
|
_output.WriteLine("DEMA Batch(TSeries) validated successfully against Skender.Stock.Indicators");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Validate_Talib_Batch()
|
|
{
|
|
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 };
|
|
|
|
// Prepare data for TA-Lib (double[])
|
|
double[] tData = _testData.RawData.ToArray();
|
|
double[] output = new double[tData.Length];
|
|
|
|
foreach (var period in periods)
|
|
{
|
|
// Calculate QuanTAlib DEMA (batch TSeries)
|
|
var dema = new global::QuanTAlib.Dema(period);
|
|
var qResult = dema.Update(_testData.Data);
|
|
|
|
// Calculate TA-Lib DEMA
|
|
var retCode = TALib.Functions.Dema<double>(tData, 0..^0, output, out var outRange, period);
|
|
Assert.Equal(TALib.Core.RetCode.Success, retCode);
|
|
|
|
int lookback = TALib.Functions.DemaLookback(period);
|
|
|
|
// Compare last 100 records
|
|
ValidationHelper.VerifyData(qResult, output, outRange, lookback);
|
|
}
|
|
_output.WriteLine("DEMA Batch(TSeries) validated successfully against TA-Lib");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Validate_Tulip_Batch()
|
|
{
|
|
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 };
|
|
|
|
// Prepare data for Tulip (double[])
|
|
double[] tData = _testData.RawData.ToArray();
|
|
|
|
foreach (var period in periods)
|
|
{
|
|
// Calculate QuanTAlib DEMA (batch TSeries)
|
|
var dema = new global::QuanTAlib.Dema(period);
|
|
var qResult = dema.Update(_testData.Data);
|
|
|
|
// Calculate Tulip DEMA
|
|
var demaIndicator = Tulip.Indicators.dema;
|
|
double[][] inputs = { tData };
|
|
double[] options = { period };
|
|
|
|
// Tulip DEMA lookback is usually period-1 for EMA, but DEMA is 2*EMA - EMA(EMA)
|
|
// Let's rely on the output length to align.
|
|
// Tulip DEMA lookback is same as EMA lookback? No, it involves double smoothing.
|
|
// Actually, Tulip's DEMA implementation might have a specific lookback.
|
|
// We'll calculate it based on output length.
|
|
|
|
// Tulip.Indicators.dema.Run expects outputs to be sized correctly.
|
|
// We'll use a large buffer and resize if needed, or just calculate lookback.
|
|
// For DEMA(n), lookback is roughly n-1 (same as EMA).
|
|
// Wait, DEMA uses EMA(EMA), so it might be 2*(n-1)?
|
|
// Let's try with n-1 first, if it fails we adjust.
|
|
// Actually, TA-Lib DEMA lookback is 2*(period-1).
|
|
// Let's assume Tulip is similar.
|
|
int lookback = 2 * (period - 1);
|
|
double[][] outputs = { new double[tData.Length - lookback] };
|
|
|
|
demaIndicator.Run(inputs, options, outputs);
|
|
var tResult = outputs[0];
|
|
|
|
// Compare last 100 records
|
|
ValidationHelper.VerifyData(qResult, tResult, lookback);
|
|
}
|
|
_output.WriteLine("DEMA Batch(TSeries) validated successfully against Tulip");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Validate_Talib_Span()
|
|
{
|
|
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 };
|
|
|
|
// Prepare data
|
|
double[] sourceData = _testData.RawData.ToArray();
|
|
double[] talibOutput = new double[sourceData.Length];
|
|
|
|
foreach (var period in periods)
|
|
{
|
|
// Calculate QuanTAlib DEMA (Span API)
|
|
double[] qOutput = new double[sourceData.Length];
|
|
global::QuanTAlib.Dema.Batch(sourceData.AsSpan(), qOutput.AsSpan(), period);
|
|
|
|
// Calculate TA-Lib DEMA
|
|
var retCode = TALib.Functions.Dema<double>(sourceData, 0..^0, talibOutput, out var outRange, period);
|
|
Assert.Equal(TALib.Core.RetCode.Success, retCode);
|
|
|
|
int lookback = TALib.Functions.DemaLookback(period);
|
|
|
|
// Compare last 100 records
|
|
ValidationHelper.VerifyData(qOutput, talibOutput, outRange, lookback);
|
|
}
|
|
_output.WriteLine("DEMA Span validated successfully against TA-Lib");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Validate_Against_Ooples()
|
|
{
|
|
// Ooples Finance implementation of DEMA is standard:
|
|
// DEMA = 2 * EMA(n) - EMA(EMA(n))
|
|
// We validate that our Dema class matches this composition using our own Ema class.
|
|
|
|
int[] periods = { 5, 10, 14, 20 };
|
|
|
|
foreach (var period in periods)
|
|
{
|
|
var dema = new Dema(period);
|
|
var ema1 = new Ema(period);
|
|
var ema2 = new Ema(period);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < _testData.Data.Count; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
var item = _testData.Data[i];
|
|
|
|
// QuanTAlib DEMA
|
|
var qVal = dema.Update(item);
|
|
|
|
// Manual DEMA (Ooples logic)
|
|
var e1 = ema1.Update(item);
|
|
var e2 = ema2.Update(e1); // EMA of EMA
|
|
double ooplesVal = 2 * e1.Value - e2.Value;
|
|
|
|
// Compare
|
|
// Note: There might be tiny differences due to floating point operations order
|
|
// or internal state handling optimization in Dema class vs composed Ema classes.
|
|
Assert.Equal(ooplesVal, qVal.Value, ValidationHelper.DefaultTolerance);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
_output.WriteLine("DEMA validated successfully against Ooples logic (2*EMA - EMA(EMA))");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|