4.3 KiB
WMA: Weighted Moving Average
Because yesterday matters more than last Tuesday. WMA is the linear answer to the question: 'What have you done for me lately?'
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Trend (FIR MA) |
| Inputs | Source (close) |
| Parameters | period |
| Outputs | Single series (Wma) |
| Output range | Tracks input |
| Warmup | period bars |
| PineScript | wma.pine |
| Signature | wma_signature |
- The Weighted Moving Average (WMA) assigns a linearly decreasing weight to data points.
- Similar: FWMA, TRIMA | Complementary: WMA crossover systems | Trading note: Linearly weighted MA; recent prices get higher weight, faster response than SMA.
- Validated against TA-Lib, Skender, and Tulip reference implementations where available.
The Weighted Moving Average (WMA) assigns a linearly decreasing weight to data points. The most recent price gets weight N, the one before it N-1, down to 1. This makes it more responsive to recent price changes than an SMA, but without the infinite tail of an EMA.
Historical Context
WMA is the "finite impulse response" (FIR) counterpart to the EMA. It was developed to reduce the lag of the SMA while maintaining a finite window of influence.
Architecture & Physics
A naive WMA implementation is O(N), requiring a full loop over the history window for every update. QuanTAlib uses a dual running-sum algorithm to achieve O(1) complexity.
The O(1) Algorithm
Two sums are maintained:
Sum: The simple sum of values (like SMA).WSum: The weighted sum.
WSum_{new} = WSum_{old} - Sum_{old} + (N \times Price_{new})
Sum_{new} = Sum_{old} - Price_{oldest} + Price_{new}
This allows calculating a WMA(1000) as fast as a WMA(10).
SIMD Optimization
For batch processing, Wma.Batch uses advanced vectorization (AVX2/AVX-512/Neon). It computes prefix sums and weighted updates in parallel, achieving throughputs that scalar code cannot touch.
Mathematical Foundation
1. The Formula
WMA = \frac{\sum_{i=0}^{N-1} (N-i) \times P_{t-i}}{\frac{N(N+1)}{2}}
The denominator is the sum of the weights (triangular number).
Performance Profile
Operation Count (Streaming Mode, Scalar)
The O(1) algorithm eliminates the O(N) weighted sum on each bar:
| Operation | Count | Cost (cycles) | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADD/SUB | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| MUL | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| DIV | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Total | 6 | — | ~22 cycles |
Hot path breakdown:
WSum_new = WSum_old - Sum_old + (N × Price_new): 2 SUB + 1 MULSum_new = Sum_old - Price_oldest + Price_new: 2 SUBWMA = WSum / divisor: 1 DIV (divisor is precomputed constant)
Comparison with naive O(N) implementation:
| Mode | Complexity | Cycles (Period=100) |
|---|---|---|
| Naive (recalculate) | O(N) | ~400 cycles |
| QuanTAlib O(1) | O(1) | ~22 cycles |
| Improvement | — | ~18× faster |
Batch Mode (SIMD/FMA)
WMA batch uses prefix sums for both Sum and WSum, enabling vectorization:
| Operation | Scalar Ops (512 bars) | SIMD Ops (AVX2) | Speedup |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prefix sum (Sum) | 512 | 64 | 8× |
| Weighted prefix sum | 512 | 64 | 8× |
| Final divisions | 512 | 64 | 8× |
The batch path achieves near-linear scaling for large datasets.
Quality Metrics
| Metric | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 10/10 | Matches TA-Lib, Skender, Tulip exactly |
| Timeliness | 6/10 | Linear weighting improves responsiveness over SMA |
| Overshoot | 10/10 | Never overshoots input data range (FIR property) |
| Smoothness | 4/10 | Less smooth than SMA; follows price closely |
Validation
| Library | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| TA-Lib | ✅ | Matches TA_WMA exactly. |
| Skender | ✅ | Matches GetWma exactly. |
| Tulip | ✅ | Matches wma exactly. |
| Ooples | ✅ | Matches CalculateWeightedMovingAverage. |