Files
Miha Kralj 6f0a339c9b fix: resolve build and test errors
- Sar.Quantower.Tests.cs: add missing opening quote on string literal (line 48)
- Exports.cs: rename Correlation.Batch → Correl.Batch (CS0103)
- Ad.Validation.Tests.cs: fix Ooples OutputValues key "Ad" → "Adl"
2026-03-16 12:45:13 -07:00

6.4 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

RS: Price Relative Strength

Price relative strength ratios two instruments, revealing which one leads and which one lags in the race.

Property Value
Category Momentum
Inputs Source (close)
Parameters smoothPeriod (default 1)
Outputs Single series (RS)
Output range Varies (see docs)
Warmup smoothPeriod bars
PineScript rs.pine
  • Category: Momentum Also known as: Relative Strength Comparison, Price Ratio, Performance Ratio
  • Similar: ROC, Bias | Complementary: Relative strength vs benchmark | Trading note: Price Relative Strength; ratio or spread between two series. Sector rotation tool.
  • Validated against TA-Lib, Skender, and Tulip reference implementations where available.

Category: Momentum
Also known as: Relative Strength Comparison, Price Ratio, Performance Ratio

Pine Script Implementation of RS

Overview

Price Relative Strength (RS) measures the performance of one asset relative to another by calculating the ratio between their prices. This indicator helps identify which asset is outperforming and is fundamental for sector rotation, pairs trading, and relative performance analysis.

Unlike the Relative Strength Index (RSI) which measures momentum within a single asset, RS compares two different price series. A rising RS indicates the base asset is outperforming the comparison asset; a falling RS indicates underperformance.

Core Concepts

  • Ratio-based: Simply divides base price by comparison price
  • Trend interpretation: Rising = outperformance, Falling = underperformance
  • Optional smoothing: EMA with bias compensation removes noise while maintaining responsiveness
  • Scale-independent: Can compare assets with vastly different price levels
  • Cross-market analysis: Compare stocks, indices, commodities, or any tradeable assets

Parameters

Parameter Default Description When to Adjust
smoothPeriod 1 EMA smoothing period (1 = no smoothing) Increase for trend analysis, decrease for signal sensitivity

Pro Tip: Use smoothPeriod=1 for raw ratio analysis, smoothPeriod=10-20 for trend identification, and smoothPeriod=50+ for longer-term relative strength trends.

Calculation

Simplified Explanation: RS divides the base asset's price by the comparison asset's price, then optionally smooths the result with an EMA.

Technical Formula:

Raw Ratio = Base Price / Comparison Price
Smoothed = EMA(Raw Ratio, smoothPeriod)

With bias-compensated EMA for accurate warmup:

α = 2 / (smoothPeriod + 1)
EMA_biased = α × (ratio - EMA_prev) + EMA_prev
compensation = 1 / (1 - (1-α)^n)
Smoothed = compensation × EMA_biased

Implementation Note: When smoothPeriod=1, the raw ratio is returned without any smoothing. Division by zero (comparison = 0) returns NaN.

Interpretation Details

Trend Analysis:

  • RS rising: Base asset outperforming comparison (bullish for base)
  • RS falling: Base asset underperforming comparison (bearish for base)
  • RS flat: Both assets moving in tandem

Common Comparisons:

  • Stock vs. sector ETF (stock relative to its sector)
  • Sector vs. broad market index (sector rotation)
  • Growth vs. Value ETFs (style performance)
  • Emerging markets vs. developed markets
  • Commodity vs. currency (inflation dynamics)

Trading Signals:

  • RS crossover above prior high: Breakout in relative strength
  • RS crossover below prior low: Breakdown in relative strength
  • Divergence: Price makes new high, RS does not = warning

Performance Profile

Operation Count (Streaming Mode)

RS with smoothing is three scalar operations: one division for the raw ratio, one FMA for the EMA update, and one divide for the bias compensation factor. Without smoothing (smoothPeriod = 1), the bias step is skipped entirely.

Operation Count Cost (cycles) Subtotal
Input validation (IsFinite checks) 2 1 ~2
Raw ratio: base / comparison 1 8 ~8
EMA update (FMA: α×ratio + decay×prev) 1 4 ~4
Bias factor update (1 (1−α)^n) 1 5 ~5
Compensated output (ema / bias) 1 8 ~8
Total 6 ~27 cycles

O(1) per bar. The dominant cost is the two floating-point divisions (ratio + bias correction). With smoothPeriod = 1, reduces to ~10 cycles (just the ratio division). WarmupPeriod = smoothPeriod.

Batch Mode (SIMD Analysis)

Operation Vectorizable? Notes
Raw ratio (base / comp element-wise) Yes VDIVPD across full span
EMA smoothing pass No Recursive IIR dependency; each EMA value depends on previous
Bias compensation Partial Bias factor is a scalar per-bar sequence; precomputable for batch
NaN guard (division by zero) Yes VCMPPD mask + VBLENDVPD for zero-denominator replacement

The SIMD bottleneck is the recursive EMA. A batch-mode implementation can precompute the raw ratio span via vectorized division (VDIVPD at 4 doubles/cycle on AVX2), then apply a scalar EMA sweep for the smoothing pass. This hybrid approach achieves roughly 2× throughput versus fully scalar for large series.

Limitations and Considerations

  • No absolute measure: Tells you relative performance, not absolute value
  • Base dependency: Results depend on which asset is the numerator
  • Lagging indicator: Smoothed version lags the raw ratio
  • Volume ignored: Pure price comparison, volume not considered
  • Currency effects: Cross-currency comparisons may include FX impact

References

  • Murphy, J. J. (1999). Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets. New York Institute of Finance.
  • Pring, M. J. (2002). Technical Analysis Explained. McGraw-Hill.
  • Sector rotation and relative strength analysis literature

See Also

  • ROC/ROCP/ROCR: Single-asset rate of change variants
  • RSI: Single-asset momentum oscillator
  • Beta: Statistical measure of relative volatility
  • Correlation: Measures how two assets move together