# HMA: Hull Moving Average > "Alan Hull looked at the lag in moving averages and said, 'I can fix that.' And he did, by making the math do gymnastics." HMA (Hull Moving Average) is a solution to the eternal struggle between smoothness and lag. Most indicators force you to choose one; HMA gives you both. It achieves this by using weighted moving averages (WMAs) in a clever configuration that cancels out lag while maintaining the smoothing properties of the WMA. ## Historical Context Developed by Alan Hull in 2005, the HMA was designed to be "responsive, accurate, and smooth." Hull realized that lag is essentially a function of the period, and by combining averages of different periods (specifically, a full period and a half period), he could mathematically offset the lag. ## Architecture & Physics The HMA is built from three Weighted Moving Averages (WMAs): 1. **WMA(n/2)**: A fast WMA of half the period. 2. **WMA(n)**: A slow WMA of the full period. 3. **WMA(sqrt(n))**: A smoothing WMA applied to the difference. The core logic is: $2 \times \text{WMA}(n/2) - \text{WMA}(n)$. This operation "over-weights" the recent data, pushing the average forward to align with the current price. The final WMA smooths out the resulting noise. ### Zero-Allocation Design Our implementation is a composite of three `Wma` instances. - **Composite Structure**: We manage three internal `Wma` objects. - **SIMD Acceleration**: The intermediate calculation ($2 \times A - B$) is vectorized using AVX2/AVX-512 where available. - **Memory Efficiency**: We reuse buffers where possible to minimize footprint. ## Mathematical Foundation $$ \text{Raw} = 2 \times \text{WMA}(P, \frac{N}{2}) - \text{WMA}(P, N) $$ $$ \text{HMA} = \text{WMA}(\text{Raw}, \sqrt{N}) $$ Where $N$ is the period. ## Performance Profile HMA is computationally more intensive than a simple WMA due to the three passes, but our implementation optimizes the intermediate step. | Metric | Complexity | Notes | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **Throughput** | High | 3x WMA cost + vector math | | **Complexity** | O(1) | Constant time update | | **Accuracy** | 8/10 | Excellent at tracking price action | | **Timeliness** | 9/10 | Very responsive, minimal lag | | **Overshoot** | 5/10 | Prone to overshoot due to lag correction | | **Smoothness** | 8/10 | Surprisingly smooth given its speed | ## Validation Validated against Alan Hull's original formula and standard library implementations. | Provider | Error Tolerance | Notes | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **Fidelity** | $10^{-9}$ | Matches standard HMA | | **Skender** | $10^{-9}$ | Matches `GetHma` | ### Common Pitfalls 1. **Overshoot**: Like DEMA, HMA can overshoot price turns because of the lag correction. 2. **Period Sensitivity**: The $\sqrt{N}$ smoothing is hardcoded into the definition. You can't easily tweak the smoothing independently of the lag correction without breaking the "Hull" definition. 3. **Integer Math**: The periods $N/2$ and $\sqrt{N}$ are rounded to integers. This can cause slight discrepancies between implementations depending on rounding rules. We use standard integer truncation.