mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-08-16 01:28:05 +00:00
feat(dynamics): add PlusDI, MinusDI, PlusDM, MinusDM indicators
Complete thin Dx-composition wrapper indicators with full test coverage: - PlusDi/MinusDi: Directional Indicator wrappers (DiPlus/DiMinus from Dx) - PlusDm/MinusDm: Directional Movement wrappers (DmPlus/DmMinus from Dx) - Individual validation tests per indicator directory (TALib, Skender, bounds) - Combined unit tests (DiDm.Tests.cs) and validation tests (DiDm.Validation.Tests.cs) - Quantower wrappers + tests for all 4 indicators - PineScript v6 implementations with compensated RMA - Normalized .md documentation for all indicators and categories - 182 tests passing, 0 failures
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# RVI: Relative Volatility Index
|
||||
|
||||
> *Not all volatility is created equal—upward volatility feels like profit, downward volatility feels like loss. RVI separates these psychological experiences into a quantifiable measure.*
|
||||
|
||||
| Property | Value |
|
||||
| ---------------- | -------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **Category** | Volatility |
|
||||
@@ -17,8 +19,6 @@
|
||||
- Requires `stdevLength` bars of warmup before first valid output (IsHot = true).
|
||||
- Validated against FM Labs revised RVI specification.
|
||||
|
||||
> "Not all volatility is created equal—upward volatility feels like profit, downward volatility feels like loss. RVI separates these psychological experiences into a quantifiable measure."
|
||||
|
||||
The Relative Volatility Index (RVI) is a directional volatility oscillator that distinguishes between upward and downward price volatility. Originally developed by Donald Dorsey in 1993 using close prices only, RVI was **revised in 1995** to compute separate RVI values on the High and Low price series and average them. This implementation follows the revised version: when fed OHLCV bars (TBar), it runs independent RVI channels on High and Low; when fed single prices (TValue), both channels receive the same value, reducing to the original formula.
|
||||
|
||||
## Historical Context
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user