feat(dynamics): add PlusDI, MinusDI, PlusDM, MinusDM indicators

Complete thin Dx-composition wrapper indicators with full test coverage:

- PlusDi/MinusDi: Directional Indicator wrappers (DiPlus/DiMinus from Dx)
- PlusDm/MinusDm: Directional Movement wrappers (DmPlus/DmMinus from Dx)
- Individual validation tests per indicator directory (TALib, Skender, bounds)
- Combined unit tests (DiDm.Tests.cs) and validation tests (DiDm.Validation.Tests.cs)
- Quantower wrappers + tests for all 4 indicators
- PineScript v6 implementations with compensated RMA
- Normalized .md documentation for all indicators and categories
- 182 tests passing, 0 failures
This commit is contained in:
Miha Kralj
2026-03-11 20:21:52 -07:00
parent 56b86bebfb
commit 33d20f2a18
437 changed files with 4589 additions and 2792 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
# GDEMA: Generalized Double Exponential Moving Average
> *Patrick Mulloy created DEMA to cancel first-order lag. GDEMA adds a volume knob: turn it past 1 and you cancel more lag than Mulloy thought possible. Turn it to 0 and you are back to a plain EMA. The generalization is the point.*
| Property | Value |
| ---------------- | -------------------------------- |
| **Category** | Trend (IIR MA) |
@@ -17,8 +19,6 @@
- Requires `period` bars of warmup before first valid output (IsHot = true).
- Validated against TA-Lib, Skender, and Tulip reference implementations where available.
> "Patrick Mulloy created DEMA to cancel first-order lag. GDEMA adds a volume knob: turn it past 1 and you cancel more lag than Mulloy thought possible. Turn it to 0 and you are back to a plain EMA. The generalization is the point."
GDEMA extends the standard DEMA (Double Exponential Moving Average) with a tunable gain factor $v$ that controls the aggressiveness of lag compensation. The formula $\text{GDEMA} = (1+v) \cdot \text{EMA}_1 - v \cdot \text{EMA}_2$ reduces to plain EMA when $v=0$, standard DEMA when $v=1$, and progressively more aggressive lag removal for $v>1$. This parametric flexibility allows traders to dial in the exact smoothness-responsiveness trade-off for their application, rather than being locked into DEMA's fixed 2:1 ratio.
## Historical Context