feat(dynamics): add PlusDI, MinusDI, PlusDM, MinusDM indicators

Complete thin Dx-composition wrapper indicators with full test coverage:

- PlusDi/MinusDi: Directional Indicator wrappers (DiPlus/DiMinus from Dx)
- PlusDm/MinusDm: Directional Movement wrappers (DmPlus/DmMinus from Dx)
- Individual validation tests per indicator directory (TALib, Skender, bounds)
- Combined unit tests (DiDm.Tests.cs) and validation tests (DiDm.Validation.Tests.cs)
- Quantower wrappers + tests for all 4 indicators
- PineScript v6 implementations with compensated RMA
- Normalized .md documentation for all indicators and categories
- 182 tests passing, 0 failures
This commit is contained in:
Miha Kralj
2026-03-11 20:21:52 -07:00
parent 56b86bebfb
commit 33d20f2a18
437 changed files with 4589 additions and 2792 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
# CRMA: Cubic Regression Moving Average
> *Linear regression tells you where the trend is going. Quadratic regression tells you it's curving. Cubic regression tells you the curve is changing its mind.*
| Property | Value |
| ---------------- | -------------------------------- |
| **Category** | Trend (FIR MA) |
@@ -17,8 +19,6 @@
- Requires `period` bars of warmup before first valid output (IsHot = true).
- Validated against TA-Lib, Skender, and Tulip reference implementations where available.
> "Linear regression tells you where the trend is going. Quadratic regression tells you it's curving. Cubic regression tells you the curve is changing its mind."
CRMA fits a degree-3 polynomial $y = a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3$ to the most recent $N$ bars via ordinary least squares, then returns the fitted endpoint value $a_0$. By capturing inflection and curvature that linear and quadratic models miss, CRMA tracks S-shaped reversals and accelerating trends with measurably lower endpoint error than LSMA or QRMA on non-stationary price series. The cost is a 4x4 linear system solve per bar, which is O(1) once power sums are accumulated in O(N).
## Historical Context