mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-08-17 01:58:06 +00:00
feat(dynamics): add PlusDI, MinusDI, PlusDM, MinusDM indicators
Complete thin Dx-composition wrapper indicators with full test coverage: - PlusDi/MinusDi: Directional Indicator wrappers (DiPlus/DiMinus from Dx) - PlusDm/MinusDm: Directional Movement wrappers (DmPlus/DmMinus from Dx) - Individual validation tests per indicator directory (TALib, Skender, bounds) - Combined unit tests (DiDm.Tests.cs) and validation tests (DiDm.Validation.Tests.cs) - Quantower wrappers + tests for all 4 indicators - PineScript v6 implementations with compensated RMA - Normalized .md documentation for all indicators and categories - 182 tests passing, 0 failures
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# GRANGER: Granger Causality F-Statistic
|
||||
|
||||
> *Correlation is not causation, but Granger causality is not causation either. It is prediction.*
|
||||
|
||||
| Property | Value |
|
||||
| ---------------- | -------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **Category** | Statistic |
|
||||
@@ -16,8 +18,6 @@
|
||||
- Requires `period + 1` bars of warmup before first valid output (IsHot = true).
|
||||
- Validated against TA-Lib, Skender, and Tulip reference implementations where available.
|
||||
|
||||
> "Correlation is not causation, but Granger causality is not causation either. It is prediction." -- Clive Granger
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
The Granger Causality test asks a precise, falsifiable question: does knowing the history of series X improve your ability to predict series Y, beyond what Y's own history already provides? The answer arrives as an F-statistic from comparing two OLS regression models. Higher F means X contains predictive information about Y that Y itself does not. This implementation uses lag-1, runs in O(1) streaming mode via running sums, and handles bar corrections for live trading.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user