mirror of
https://github.com/mihakralj/QuanTAlib.git
synced 2026-08-20 19:48:05 +00:00
feat(dynamics): add PlusDI, MinusDI, PlusDM, MinusDM indicators
Complete thin Dx-composition wrapper indicators with full test coverage: - PlusDi/MinusDi: Directional Indicator wrappers (DiPlus/DiMinus from Dx) - PlusDm/MinusDm: Directional Movement wrappers (DmPlus/DmMinus from Dx) - Individual validation tests per indicator directory (TALib, Skender, bounds) - Combined unit tests (DiDm.Tests.cs) and validation tests (DiDm.Validation.Tests.cs) - Quantower wrappers + tests for all 4 indicators - PineScript v6 implementations with compensated RMA - Normalized .md documentation for all indicators and categories - 182 tests passing, 0 failures
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# NW: Nadaraya-Watson Kernel Regression
|
||||
|
||||
> *Nadaraya and Watson independently discovered the same thing in 1964: weight each observation by how close it is, normalize, and average. Fifty years later, it became one of the most popular nonparametric smoothers on TradingView. The math did not change; only our ability to compute it in real time.*
|
||||
|
||||
| Property | Value |
|
||||
| ---------------- | -------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **Category** | Filter |
|
||||
@@ -17,8 +19,6 @@
|
||||
- Requires `period` bars of warmup before first valid output (IsHot = true).
|
||||
- Validated against TA-Lib, Skender, and Tulip reference implementations where available.
|
||||
|
||||
> "Nadaraya and Watson independently discovered the same thing in 1964: weight each observation by how close it is, normalize, and average. Fifty years later, it became one of the most popular nonparametric smoothers on TradingView. The math did not change; only our ability to compute it in real time."
|
||||
|
||||
NW computes the Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression estimator with a Gaussian kernel, producing a nonparametric smooth of the price series. For each bar, every observation in the lookback window is weighted by a Gaussian function of its temporal distance, with the bandwidth parameter $h$ controlling the effective smoothing radius. Small $h$ tracks price tightly (low bias, high variance); large $h$ smooths heavily (high bias, low variance). This implementation is non-repainting (backward-looking only).
|
||||
|
||||
## Historical Context
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user