Files
NexQuant/rdagent/core/evolving_framework.py
T
USTCKevinF ebb659a018 reporeformat V2 (#23)
* reformat factor implement process

* move some code to more reasonable place

* fix the bug

* add test function in factor_extract_and_implement.py

* change select factor number to ratio , add some factor implement setting and fix some bug while using knowledgebase

* change evoagent

* add abstract class EvoAgent

* add benchmark workflow

* fix some bug in llm_utils

* run wenjun's code

* fix the knowledgebase instance check

---------

Co-authored-by: xuyang1 <xuyang1@microsoft.com>
2024-06-14 12:59:44 +08:00

132 lines
3.2 KiB
Python

from __future__ import annotations
import copy
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Any
class Feedback:
pass
class Knowledge:
pass
class QueriedKnowledge:
pass
class KnowledgeBase(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def query(
self,
) -> QueriedKnowledge | None:
raise NotImplementedError
class EvolvableSubjects:
"""The target object to be evolved"""
def clone(self) -> EvolvableSubjects:
return copy.deepcopy(self)
class QlibEvolvableSubjects(EvolvableSubjects):
...
class Evaluator(ABC):
"""Both external EvolvableSubjects and internal evovler, it is
FAQ:
- Q: If we have a external whitebox evaluator, do we need a
intenral EvolvableSubjects?
A: When the external evovler is very complex, maybe a internal LLM-based evovler
may provide more understandable feedbacks.
"""
@abstractmethod
def evaluate(self, evo: EvolvableSubjects, **kwargs: Any) -> Feedback:
raise NotImplementedError
class SelfEvaluator(Evaluator):
pass
@dataclass
class EvoStep:
"""At a specific step,
based on
- previous trace
- newly RAG kownledge `QueriedKnowledge`
the EvolvableSubjects is evolved to a new one `EvolvableSubjects`.
(optional) After evaluation, we get feedback `feedback`.
"""
evolvable_subjects: EvolvableSubjects
queried_knowledge: QueriedKnowledge | None = None
feedback: Feedback | None = None
class EvolvingStrategy(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def evolve(
self,
*evo: EvolvableSubjects,
evolving_trace: list[EvoStep] | None = None,
queried_knowledge: QueriedKnowledge | None = None,
**kwargs: Any,
) -> EvolvableSubjects:
"""The evolving trace is a list of (evolvable_subjects, feedback) ordered
according to the time.
The reason why the parameter is important for the evolving.
- evolving_trace: the historical feedback is important.
- queried_knowledge: queried knowledge
"""
class EvoAgent(ABC):
def __init__(self, max_loop, evolving_strategy) -> None:
self.max_loop = max_loop
self.evolving_strategy = evolving_strategy
@abstractmethod
def multistep_evolve(self, evo: EvolvableSubjects, eva: Evaluator | Feedback, **kwargs: Any) -> EvolvableSubjects:
pass
class RAGStrategy(ABC):
"""Retrival Augmentation Generation Strategy"""
def __init__(self, knowledgebase: KnowledgeBase) -> None:
self.knowledgebase = knowledgebase
@abstractmethod
def query(
self,
evo: EvolvableSubjects,
evolving_trace: list[EvoStep],
**kwargs: Any,
) -> QueriedKnowledge | None:
pass
@abstractmethod
def generate_knowledge(
self,
evolving_trace: list[EvoStep],
*,
return_knowledge: bool = False,
**kwargs: Any,
) -> Knowledge | None:
"""Generating new knowledge based on the evolving trace.
- It is encouraged to query related knowledge before generating new knowledge.
RAGStrategy should maintain the new knowledge all by itself.
"""