Files
NexQuant/rdagent/components/coder/factor_coder/eva_utils.py
T
you-n-g 7f4c2d18c6 feat: refactor for general data science (#498)
* refine ds modal for more cases: eval and es

* update model template

* prompts for model and ensemble

* fix a bug

* fix a bug

* init: ds workflow evovingstrategy

* Adding ensemble (#505)

* Initial Draft

* Updating logic for init

* Revising

* Successful Testing

* Updating to use the latest & right class

* bug: bug-fixing for testing

* data science loop changes

* data science loop base

* ds loop feedback

* fix

* remove measure_time because it's duplicated (in LoopBase)

* add the knowledge query for data_loader & feature

* edit ds workflow evaluator

* data_loader bug fix

* stop evolving when all tasks completed

* llm app change

* fix break all complete strategy

* Adding queried knowledge (#508)

Co-authored-by: XianBW <36835909+XianBW@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix loop bug

* ds workflow evaluator; test; refine prompts

* workflow spec

* fix ci

* feature task changes

* ds loop change

* fix a bug in feat

* add query knowledge for model and workflow

* llm_debug info(for show) using pickle instead of json

* remove NextLoopException

* loop change

* coder raise CoderError when all sub_tasks failed

* rename code_dict to file_dict in FBWorkspace

* add CoSTEER unittest

* now show self.version in Task.get_task_information(), simplify CoSTEER sub tasks definition

* remove some properties in ModelTask, add model_type in it.

* fix llm app bug

* llm web app bug fix

* ds loop bug fix

* fix: give component code to feature&ens eval

* loop catch error bug

* rename load_from_raw_data to load_data

* feat: Add debug data creation functionality for data science scenarios

* support local folder (#511)

* support local folder

* remove unnecessary random

* KaggleScen Subclass

* small fix

* use template for style description

* update default scen to kaggle

* update sample data script

* make sure frac < 1

* fix a bug

* feature spec changes

* fix

* changeimport order

* clear unnecessary std outputs

* fix a typo

* create sample folder after unzip kaggle data

* feature/model test script update

* Align the data types across modules.

* fix a bug in model eval

* show line number

* move sample entry point to app

* spec & model prompt changes

* Refine the competition specification to address the data type problem and the coherence issue.

* fix some bugs

* add file filter in FBworkspace.code property

* support non-binary prediction

* avoid too much warnings

* fix a bug in ensemble module

* filtered the knowledge query in all modules

* delete RAG in idea proposal

* refine the code in ensemble

* show exp workspace in llm_st

* exp_gen bug fix

* feedback bug fix

* use `feature` instead of `feat01`

* Trace & method of judging if exp is completed change

* fix a bug in package calling and execute ci

* fix code

* bug fix

* bug fix

* fix a bug

* fix some bugs

* fix a bug

* refactor: Enhance error handling and feedback in data science loop

* support different use_azure on chat and embedding models

* multi-model proposal logic

* fix a small syntax error

* loopBase and some changes

* ensemble scores change

* fbworkspace.code -> .all_codes

* use all model codes in workflow coder

* check scores.csv's keys(model_names)

* model name changes

* add a todo in  ensemble test

* sota_exp changes

* give model info in exp gen

* add runner time limit

* config using debug data or not in evals

* exp to feedback base

* add feature code when writing model task

* small problem

* copying during sampling

* update

* refactor: Simplify code handling and improve workspace management

* model part output fix

* print model's execution time

* bug fix

* ensemble test fix

* ens small change

* ens_test bug fix

* Refine partial expansion logic to display only a few subfolders when their structure is uniform, improving readability in nested directories.

* several update on prompts

* sample subfolders

* Filter the stdout after code execution to remove irrelevant information e.g. progress bars, whitespace characters, excessive line breaks.

* Add some more prompts and comments

* several update on the first init rounds

* model timeout as error

* fix pattern of getting model codes in workspace

* small bux fix on model prompts

* remove get_code_with_key since we have regex pattern

* fix: Correct tqdm progress bar update logic in LoopBase class

* feat: Add diff generation and enhance feedback mechanism in data science loop

* update some fix to model and workflow prompts

* refine the logic of progress bar filter

* add last_successful_exp in exp_gen

* fix a one line bug

* add a hint in prompt

* fix data sample for bms

* fix data sample for bms

* hypothesis small fix

* crawler readme update

* fix component gen

* fix bug

* annotation change

* load description.md if it exists

* refactor: Simplify SOTA description handling in feedback and prompts

* refactor: Use shared templates for feedback and experiment descriptions

* change webapp for model codes changes

* update proposal

* add timeout message for docker run output

* fix

* refine the code in docker time processing

* use .shape instead of len() when do shape eval

* won't change size during iteration

* support bson sample

* sample support jsonl and bson

* add former_code to coder prompts

* a little speed us in debug data creating

* filter progress bar when eval ens and main

* avoid costeer makes no change to former code

* fix several log error

* add timeout judge threshold

* fix some bugs in the evaluation of component output shapes

* File structure for supporting litellm (#517)

Co-authored-by: Young <afe.young@gmail.com>

* ignore submission and show processing

* ignore submission and show processing

* add efficiency notice

* refactor: Enhance error message with detailed feedback summary

* refactor: Simplify component handling in DSExpGen class

* refactor: Update code structure and add docstring for clarity

* reserve one sample to each label in data sampling

* add Evaluation info

* refine costeer code to avoid giving same code twice

* use raw_description as plain text

* add a prompt hint to avoid same dict key

* model task name bug in first model exp gen

* fix a typo

* add some debug info in costeer tests

* task init change

* enhance data sampling

* refine the code in data_loader

* more reasonable loop

* fix a bug in data folder description

* add error msg & traceback to execution feedback

* fix llm error msg detection

* add task information to costeer eval & add cache to docker run(use zipfile to store the whole workspace)

* fix CI first round

* fix CI second round

* use txt to store test script to avoid pytest

* remove zipfile in requirements

* add azure.identity to requirements

* ignore debug web page

* component test changes

* remove redundent task_desc in model coder

* feat: Add APE module and prompts for automated prompt engineering

* fix: Update .gitignore and improve text formatting in eval.py

* refactor: Update print output and improve code comments and imports

* style: Fix string formatting and import order in ape.py and fmt.py

* exclude ape

* add a data folder notice

* reduce unnecessary output to stdout

* refine the code of describe_data_folder

* fix ci

* style: streamlit style update (#522)

* streamlit style update

* fix import

* fix format

* fix llm_st loop progress bar

* debugapp small change

* fix model str

* refine some prompts

* fix model str

* fix CI

* refine the logic associated with the data_folder

* fix ci

* small change

* set filter_progress_bar as default in execute

* model proposal with workflow

* add submission check in workflow eval

* fix bug

* small change

* fix CI

* fix CI

* refactor: Move generate_diff to utils and update DSExpGen logic

* more reasonable prompt describing metric direction

* fix a minor jinja2 bug

* quick fix exp_gen bugs

* fix the following bug

* fix

* fix some bugs

* remove workflow from model

* add pending_tasks_list in data science to enable coding model and workflow

* refine the code for handling JSON-formatted data descriptions

* assert with information

* ensure correct csv file name

* add logging to help record the output

* log competition

* add log tag for debug llm app

* test: Test ds refactor ll (#523)

* fix bugs to former scenario

* fix a bug because coding in rdloop changed

* fix the bug when feedback gets no hypothesis

* fix trace structure

* change all trace hist when merging hypothesis to experiments

* ignore some error in ruff

* fix kaggle scenario bugs

* refine one line

* another bug

* another small bug

* fix ui bugs

* chage kaggle  train.py path

---------

Co-authored-by: Xu Yang <peteryang@vip.qq.com>

* fix CI

* Update rdagent/app/data_science/loop.py

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* add samplecsv into spec prompts

* fix CI

---------

Co-authored-by: TPLin22 <tplin2@163.com>
Co-authored-by: yuanteli <1957922024@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Xisen Wang <118058822+xisen-w@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bowen Xian <xianbowen@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Xu Yang <peteryang@vip.qq.com>
Co-authored-by: XianBW <36835909+XianBW@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim <illking@foxmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 炼金术师华华 <37462254+YeewahChan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Linlang <30293408+SunsetWolf@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-01-17 22:53:05 +08:00

577 lines
22 KiB
Python

import io
import json
from abc import abstractmethod
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Tuple
import pandas as pd
from jinja2 import Environment, StrictUndefined
from rdagent.components.coder.factor_coder.config import FACTOR_COSTEER_SETTINGS
from rdagent.components.coder.factor_coder.factor import FactorTask
from rdagent.core.experiment import Task, Workspace
from rdagent.core.prompts import Prompts
from rdagent.oai.llm_conf import LLM_SETTINGS
from rdagent.oai.llm_utils import APIBackend
evaluate_prompts = Prompts(file_path=Path(__file__).parent / "prompts.yaml")
class FactorEvaluator:
"""Although the init method is same to Evaluator, but we want to emphasize they are different"""
def __init__(self, scen=None) -> None:
self.scen = scen
@abstractmethod
def evaluate(
self,
target_task: Task,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
**kwargs,
) -> Tuple[str, object]:
"""You can get the dataframe by
.. code-block:: python
_, gen_df = implementation.execute()
_, gt_df = gt_implementation.execute()
Returns
-------
Tuple[str, object]
- str: the text-based description of the evaluation result
- object: a comparable metric (bool, integer, float ...) None for evaluator with only text-based result
"""
raise NotImplementedError("Please implement the `evaluator` method")
def _get_df(self, gt_implementation: Workspace, implementation: Workspace):
if gt_implementation is not None:
_, gt_df = gt_implementation.execute()
if isinstance(gt_df, pd.Series):
gt_df = gt_df.to_frame("gt_factor")
if isinstance(gt_df, pd.DataFrame):
gt_df = gt_df.sort_index()
else:
gt_df = None
_, gen_df = implementation.execute()
if isinstance(gen_df, pd.Series):
gen_df = gen_df.to_frame("source_factor")
if isinstance(gen_df, pd.DataFrame):
gen_df = gen_df.sort_index()
return gt_df, gen_df
def __str__(self) -> str:
return self.__class__.__name__
class FactorCodeEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
target_task: FactorTask,
implementation: Workspace,
execution_feedback: str,
value_feedback: str = "",
gt_implementation: Workspace = None,
**kwargs,
):
factor_information = target_task.get_task_information()
code = implementation.all_codes
system_prompt = (
Environment(undefined=StrictUndefined)
.from_string(evaluate_prompts["evaluator_code_feedback_v1_system"])
.render(
scenario=(
self.scen.get_scenario_all_desc(
target_task,
filtered_tag="feature",
simple_background=FACTOR_COSTEER_SETTINGS.simple_background,
)
if self.scen is not None
else "No scenario description."
)
)
)
execution_feedback_to_render = execution_feedback
for _ in range(10): # 10 times to split the content is enough
user_prompt = (
Environment(undefined=StrictUndefined)
.from_string(
evaluate_prompts["evaluator_code_feedback_v1_user"],
)
.render(
factor_information=factor_information,
code=code,
execution_feedback=execution_feedback_to_render,
value_feedback=value_feedback,
gt_code=gt_implementation.code if gt_implementation else None,
)
)
if (
APIBackend().build_messages_and_calculate_token(
user_prompt=user_prompt,
system_prompt=system_prompt,
)
> LLM_SETTINGS.chat_token_limit
):
execution_feedback_to_render = execution_feedback_to_render[len(execution_feedback_to_render) // 2 :]
else:
break
critic_response = APIBackend().build_messages_and_create_chat_completion(
user_prompt=user_prompt,
system_prompt=system_prompt,
json_mode=False,
)
return critic_response, None
class FactorInfEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
) -> Tuple[str, object]:
_, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df is None:
return (
"The source dataframe is None. Please check the implementation.",
False,
)
INF_count = gen_df.isin([float("inf"), -float("inf")]).sum().sum()
if INF_count == 0:
return "The source dataframe does not have any infinite values.", True
else:
return (
f"The source dataframe has {INF_count} infinite values. Please check the implementation.",
False,
)
class FactorSingleColumnEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
) -> Tuple[str, object]:
_, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df is None:
return (
"The source dataframe is None. Please check the implementation.",
False,
)
if len(gen_df.columns) == 1:
return "The source dataframe has only one column which is correct.", True
else:
return (
"The source dataframe has more than one column. Please check the implementation. We only evaluate the first column.",
False,
)
class FactorOutputFormatEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
) -> Tuple[str, object]:
gt_df, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df is None:
return (
"The source dataframe is None. Skip the evaluation of the output format.",
False,
)
buffer = io.StringIO()
gen_df.info(buf=buffer)
gen_df_info_str = f"The user is currently working on a feature related task.\nThe output dataframe info is:\n{buffer.getvalue()}"
system_prompt = (
Environment(undefined=StrictUndefined)
.from_string(
evaluate_prompts["evaluator_output_format_system"],
)
.render(
scenario=(
self.scen.get_scenario_all_desc(implementation.target_task, filtered_tag="feature")
if self.scen is not None
else "No scenario description."
)
)
)
# TODO: with retry_context(retry_n=3, except_list=[KeyError]):
max_attempts = 3
attempts = 0
final_evaluation_dict = None
while attempts < max_attempts:
try:
api = APIBackend() if attempts == 0 else APIBackend(use_chat_cache=False)
resp = api.build_messages_and_create_chat_completion(
user_prompt=gen_df_info_str, system_prompt=system_prompt, json_mode=True
)
resp_dict = json.loads(resp)
resp_dict["output_format_decision"] = str(resp_dict["output_format_decision"]).lower() in ["true", "1"]
return (
str(resp_dict["output_format_feedback"]),
resp_dict["output_format_decision"],
)
except (KeyError, json.JSONDecodeError) as e:
attempts += 1
if attempts >= max_attempts:
raise KeyError(
"Wrong JSON Response or missing 'output_format_decision' or 'output_format_feedback' key after multiple attempts."
) from e
return "Failed to evaluate output format after multiple attempts.", False
class FactorDatetimeDailyEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
) -> Tuple[str | object]:
_, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df is None:
return "The source dataframe is None. Skip the evaluation of the datetime format.", False
if "datetime" not in gen_df.index.names:
return "The source dataframe does not have a datetime index. Please check the implementation.", False
try:
pd.to_datetime(gen_df.index.get_level_values("datetime"))
except Exception:
return (
f"The source dataframe has a datetime index but it is not in the correct format (maybe a regular string or other objects). Please check the implementation.\n The head of the output dataframe is: \n{gen_df.head()}",
False,
)
time_diff = pd.to_datetime(gen_df.index.get_level_values("datetime")).to_series().diff().dropna().unique()
if pd.Timedelta(minutes=1) in time_diff:
return (
"The generated dataframe is not daily. The implementation is definitely wrong. Please check the implementation.",
False,
)
return "The generated dataframe is daily.", True
class FactorRowCountEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
) -> Tuple[str, object]:
gt_df, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df is None:
return (
"The source dataframe is None. Please check the implementation.",
False,
)
ratio = min(len(gen_df), len(gt_df)) / max(len(gen_df), len(gt_df))
return (
(
f"The ratio of rows count in the source dataframe to the ground truth dataframe is {ratio:.2f}. "
+ "Please verify the implementation. "
if ratio <= 0.99
else ""
),
ratio,
)
class FactorIndexEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
) -> Tuple[str, object]:
gt_df, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df is None:
return (
"The source dataframe is None. Please check the implementation.",
False,
)
gen_index_set, gt_index_set = set(gen_df.index), set(gt_df.index)
similarity = len(gen_index_set.intersection(gt_index_set)) / len(gen_index_set.union(gt_index_set))
return (
(
f"The source dataframe and the ground truth dataframe have different index with a similarity of {similarity:.2%}. The similarity is calculated by the number of shared indices divided by the union indices. "
+ "Please check the implementation."
if similarity <= 0.99
else ""
),
similarity,
)
class FactorMissingValuesEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
) -> Tuple[str, object]:
gt_df, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df is None:
return (
"The source dataframe is None. Please check the implementation.",
False,
)
if gen_df.isna().sum().sum() == gt_df.isna().sum().sum():
return "Both dataframes have the same missing values.", True
else:
return (
f"The dataframes do not have the same missing values. The source dataframe has {gen_df.isna().sum().sum()} missing values, while the ground truth dataframe has {gt_df.isna().sum().sum()} missing values. Please check the implementation.",
False,
)
class FactorEqualValueRatioEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
) -> Tuple[str, object]:
gt_df, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df is None:
return (
"The source dataframe is None. Please check the implementation.",
-1,
)
try:
close_values = gen_df.sub(gt_df).abs().lt(1e-6)
result_int = close_values.astype(int)
pos_num = result_int.sum().sum()
acc_rate = pos_num / close_values.size
except:
close_values = gen_df
if close_values.all().iloc[0]:
return (
"All values in the dataframes are equal within the tolerance of 1e-6.",
acc_rate,
)
else:
return (
"Some values differ by more than the tolerance of 1e-6. Check for rounding errors or differences in the calculation methods.",
acc_rate,
)
class FactorCorrelationEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def __init__(self, hard_check: bool, *args, **kwargs) -> None:
super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.hard_check = hard_check
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
) -> Tuple[str, object]:
gt_df, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df is None:
return (
"The source dataframe is None. Please check the implementation.",
False,
)
concat_df = pd.concat([gen_df, gt_df], axis=1)
concat_df.columns = ["source", "gt"]
ic = concat_df.groupby("datetime").apply(lambda df: df["source"].corr(df["gt"])).dropna().mean()
ric = (
concat_df.groupby("datetime")
.apply(lambda df: df["source"].corr(df["gt"], method="spearman"))
.dropna()
.mean()
)
if self.hard_check:
if ic > 0.99 and ric > 0.99:
return (
f"The dataframes are highly correlated. The ic is {ic:.6f} and the rankic is {ric:.6f}.",
True,
)
else:
return (
f"The dataframes are not sufficiently high correlated. The ic is {ic:.6f} and the rankic is {ric:.6f}. Investigate the factors that might be causing the discrepancies and ensure that the logic of the factor calculation is consistent.",
False,
)
else:
return f"The ic is ({ic:.6f}) and the rankic is ({ric:.6f}).", ic
class FactorValueEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
implementation: Workspace,
gt_implementation: Workspace,
version: int = 1, # 1 for qlib factors and 2 for kaggle factors
**kwargs,
) -> Tuple:
conclusions = []
# Initialize result variables
row_result = 0
index_result = 0
output_format_result = None
equal_value_ratio_result = 0
high_correlation_result = False
row_result = None
# Check if both dataframe has only one columns Mute this since factor task might generate more than one columns now
if version == 1:
feedback_str, _ = FactorSingleColumnEvaluator(self.scen).evaluate(implementation, gt_implementation)
conclusions.append(feedback_str)
elif version == 2:
input_shape = self.scen.input_shape
_, gen_df = self._get_df(gt_implementation, implementation)
if gen_df.shape[-1] > input_shape[-1]:
conclusions.append(
"Output dataframe has more columns than input feature which is not acceptable in feature processing tasks. Please check the implementation to avoid generating too many columns. Consider this implementation as a failure."
)
feedback_str, inf_evaluate_res = FactorInfEvaluator(self.scen).evaluate(implementation, gt_implementation)
conclusions.append(feedback_str)
# Check if the index of the dataframe is ("datetime", "instrument")
feedback_str, _ = FactorOutputFormatEvaluator(self.scen).evaluate(implementation, gt_implementation)
conclusions.append(feedback_str)
if version == 1:
feedback_str, daily_check_result = FactorDatetimeDailyEvaluator(self.scen).evaluate(
implementation, gt_implementation
)
conclusions.append(feedback_str)
else:
daily_check_result = None
# Check dataframe format
if gt_implementation is not None:
feedback_str, row_result = FactorRowCountEvaluator(self.scen).evaluate(implementation, gt_implementation)
conclusions.append(feedback_str)
feedback_str, index_result = FactorIndexEvaluator(self.scen).evaluate(implementation, gt_implementation)
conclusions.append(feedback_str)
feedback_str, output_format_result = FactorMissingValuesEvaluator(self.scen).evaluate(
implementation, gt_implementation
)
conclusions.append(feedback_str)
feedback_str, equal_value_ratio_result = FactorEqualValueRatioEvaluator(self.scen).evaluate(
implementation, gt_implementation
)
conclusions.append(feedback_str)
if index_result > 0.99:
feedback_str, high_correlation_result = FactorCorrelationEvaluator(
hard_check=True, scen=self.scen
).evaluate(implementation, gt_implementation)
else:
high_correlation_result = False
feedback_str = "The source dataframe and the ground truth dataframe have different index. Give up comparing the values and correlation because it's useless"
conclusions.append(feedback_str)
# Combine all conclusions into a single string
conclusion_str = "\n".join(conclusions)
if gt_implementation is not None and (equal_value_ratio_result > 0.99) or high_correlation_result:
decision_from_value_check = True
elif (
row_result is not None
and row_result <= 0.99
or output_format_result is False
or daily_check_result is False
or inf_evaluate_res is False
):
decision_from_value_check = False
else:
decision_from_value_check = None
return conclusion_str, decision_from_value_check
class FactorFinalDecisionEvaluator(FactorEvaluator):
def evaluate(
self,
target_task: FactorTask,
execution_feedback: str,
value_feedback: str,
code_feedback: str,
**kwargs,
) -> Tuple:
system_prompt = (
Environment(undefined=StrictUndefined)
.from_string(evaluate_prompts["evaluator_final_decision_v1_system"])
.render(
scenario=(
self.scen.get_scenario_all_desc(target_task, filtered_tag="feature")
if self.scen is not None
else "No scenario description."
)
)
)
execution_feedback_to_render = execution_feedback
for _ in range(10): # 10 times to split the content is enough
user_prompt = (
Environment(undefined=StrictUndefined)
.from_string(
evaluate_prompts["evaluator_final_decision_v1_user"],
)
.render(
factor_information=target_task.get_task_information(),
execution_feedback=execution_feedback_to_render,
code_feedback=code_feedback,
value_feedback=(
value_feedback
if value_feedback is not None
else "No Ground Truth Value provided, so no evaluation on value is performed."
),
)
)
if (
APIBackend().build_messages_and_calculate_token(
user_prompt=user_prompt,
system_prompt=system_prompt,
)
> LLM_SETTINGS.chat_token_limit
):
execution_feedback_to_render = execution_feedback_to_render[len(execution_feedback_to_render) // 2 :]
else:
break
# TODO: with retry_context(retry_n=3, except_list=[KeyError]):
final_evaluation_dict = None
attempts = 0
max_attempts = 3
while attempts < max_attempts:
try:
api = APIBackend() if attempts == 0 else APIBackend(use_chat_cache=False)
final_evaluation_dict = json.loads(
api.build_messages_and_create_chat_completion(
user_prompt=user_prompt,
system_prompt=system_prompt,
json_mode=True,
seed=attempts, # in case of useless retrying when cache enabled.
),
)
final_decision = final_evaluation_dict["final_decision"]
final_feedback = final_evaluation_dict["final_feedback"]
final_decision = str(final_decision).lower() in ["true", "1"]
return final_decision, final_feedback
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
raise ValueError("Failed to decode JSON response from API.") from e
except KeyError as e:
attempts += 1
if attempts >= max_attempts:
raise KeyError(
"Response from API is missing 'final_decision' or 'final_feedback' key after multiple attempts."
) from e
return None, None