Files
NexQuant/rdagent/scenarios/data_science/share.yaml
T
you-n-g 09be71d586 feat: parallel loop running based on asyncio (#932)
* refactor: split workflow into pkg, add WorkflowTracker & wait_retry

* feat: add async LoopBase with parallel workers and step semaphores

* fix: replace pickle with dill and run blocking tasks via joblib wrapper

* feat: add log format settings, dynamic parallelism & pickle-based snapshot

* fix: default step semaphore to 1 and avoid subprocess when single worker

* merge bowen's changes

* merge tim's changes

* refactor: extract component task mapping, add conditional logger setup

* lint

* refactor: add type hints and safer remain_time metric logging in workflow

* lint

* fix: allow BadRequestError to be pickled via custom copyreg reducer

* fix: stop loop when LoopTerminationError is raised in LoopBase

* lint

* refactor: make log tag context-local using ContextVar for thread safety

* feat: add subproc_step flag and helper to decide subprocess execution

* fix: use ./cache path and normalize relative volume bind paths

* fix: reset loop_idx to 0 on loop restart/resume to ensure correct flow

* fix: avoid chmod on cache and input dirs in Env timeout wrapper

* fix: skip chmod on 'cache' and 'input' dirs using find -prune

* fix: restrict chmod to immediate mount dirs excluding cache/input

* fix: chmod cache and input dirs alongside their contents after entry run

* fix: guard chmod with directory checks for cache and input

* fix: prefix mount_path in chmod command for cache/input dirs

* fix: drop quotes from find exclude patterns to ensure chmod executes

* fix: skip chmod on cache/input directories to avoid warning spam

* feat: support string volume mappings and poll subprocess stdout/stderr

* support remove symbolic link

* test: use dynamic home path and code volume in LocalEnv local_simple

* fix: skip trace and progress update when loop step is withdrawn

* refactor: add clean_workspace util and non-destructive workspace backup

* fix: preserve symlinks when backing up workspace with copytree

* fix: prevent AttributeError when _pbar not yet initialized in LoopBase

* perf: replace shutil.copytree with rsync for faster workspace backup

* fix: cast log directory Path to str in tar command of data science loop

* fix: use portable 'cp -r -P' instead of rsync for workspace backup

* fix: add retry and logging to workspace backup for robustness

* refactor: extract backup_folder helper and reuse in DataScienceRDLoop

* fix: propagate backup errors & default _pbar getattr to avoid error

* fix the division by zero bug

* refactor: execute RD loops via asyncio.run and add necessary imports

* lint

* lint

* lint

---------

Co-authored-by: Xu <v-xuminrui@microsoft.com>
2025-06-12 11:44:14 +08:00

314 lines
19 KiB
YAML

describe: # some template to describe some object
# exp is a template used fo
exp: |-
## {{ heading | default('Best solution of previous exploration of the scenario') }}
{% if exp %}
### Code
Here is the complete code of the solution.
{{ exp.experiment_workspace.all_codes }}
{% if exp.hypothesis is not none %}
### Hypothesis for the experiment
the experiment is designed based on hypothesis: {{exp.hypothesis}}
{% endif %}
### Results
{% if exp.result is none %}
There are no according evaluation results
{% else %}
Evaluated results on validation are:
{{ exp.result }}
{% if exp.format_check_result is not none %}
Submission format check result is:
{{ exp.format_check_result }}
{% endif %}
{% endif %}
{% else %}
No previous complete experiment available.
{% endif %}
feedback: |-
{% if exp_and_feedback and exp_and_feedback|length > 1 %}
## {{heading | default('Previous trial and feedback')}}
{% if exp_and_feedback[0].hypothesis %}
the experiment is designed based on hypothesis: {{ exp_and_feedback[0].hypothesis }}
{% endif %}
feedback decision: {{ exp_and_feedback[1].decision }}
reason: {{ exp_and_feedback[1].reason }}
{% endif %}
trace: |-
{% if exp_and_feedback_list|length == 0 %}
No previous {% if type == "success" %}SOTA{% elif type == "failure" %}failed{% endif %} experiments available.
{% else %}
{% for exp_and_feedback in exp_and_feedback_list %}
## Experiment Index: {{ loop.index }}
Target Problem: {{ exp_and_feedback[0].hypothesis.problem_desc }}
{% if not pipeline %}Chosen Component: {{ exp_and_feedback[0].hypothesis.component }}{% endif %}
Proposed Hypothesis: {{ exp_and_feedback[0].hypothesis.hypothesis }}
Surpass Previous SOTA: {{ exp_and_feedback[1].decision }}
{% if exp_and_feedback[0].result is none %}
Experiment Score: Running buggy
Experiment Error: {{ exp_and_feedback[1].reason }}
{% else %}
Experiment Score: {{ exp_and_feedback[0].result.loc["ensemble"].iloc[0] }}
Experiment Feedback: {{ exp_and_feedback[1].reason }}
{% endif %}
{% endfor %}
{% endif %}
scen: # customizable
role: |-
You are a Kaggle Grandmaster and expert ML engineer with deep expertise in statistics, machine learning, and competition optimization.
input_path: "./input/"
component_description:
DataLoadSpec: |-
Loads raw competition data, ensuring proper data types, and providing an exploratory data analysis summary.
- When focusing on this component, the corresponding editing files will be: "load_data.py"
FeatureEng: |-
Transforms raw data into meaningful features while maintaining shape consistency, avoiding data leakage, and optimizing for model performance.
It should be model-agnostic (data transformations/augmentations that apply only to specific model frameworks should not be included here).
Ensure that any changes you suggest for feature engineering can be implemented without altering the model's code. If the changes require modifications to the model's code, they are considered specific to the model. We should focus on the model component to apply these changes.
- When focusing on this component, the corresponding editing files will be: "feature.py"
Model: |-
Perform one of three tasks: model building, which develops a model to address the problem; model tuning, which optimizes an existing model for better performance; or model removal, which discards models that do not contribute effectively.
Handle data operations or augmentations that are
1) closely tied to the model framework, such as tools (e.g., PyTorch's Datasets & DataLoaders) provided by PyTorch or TensorFlow.
2) cannot be applied in feature engineering ("feature.py") without modifying the model code.
- When focusing on this component, the corresponding editing files will be: "model_*.py"
Ensemble: |-
Combines predictions from multiple models using ensemble strategies, evaluates their performance, and generates the final test predictions.
- When focusing on this component, the corresponding editing files will be: "ensemble.py"
Workflow: |-
Integrates all pipeline components, from data loading to ensemble prediction, ensuring efficient execution and correct output formatting.
- When focusing on this component, the corresponding editing files will be: "main.py"
component_description_in_pipeline: |-
[DataLoadSpec]: Focus on the data loading and preprocessing aspects of the pipeline, ensuring that the data is correctly formatted and ready for feature engineering.
[FeatureEng]: Concentrate on transforming the raw data into meaningful features while maintaining the integrity of the dataset.
[Model]: Focus on the model building, tuning of the pipeline, ensuring that the model is optimized for performance.
[Ensemble]: Concentrate on combining predictions from multiple models and evaluating their performance.
[Workflow]: Focus on the overall integration of the pipeline or parts not included in the other components, ensuring that all components work together seamlessly.
component_spec:
general: |-
{{ spec }}
Your code will be tested by the code below. You must ensure your implementation passes the test code:
```python
{{ test_code }}
```
DataLoadSpec: |-
1. File Handling:
- Handle file encoding and delimiters appropriately.
- Combine or process multiple files if necessary.
- Avoid using the sample submission file to infer test indices. If a dedicated test index file is available, use that. If not, use the order in the test file as the test index.
- If each prediction sample is linked to a file on disk, simply load the file paths (please load the full path to make it easier to write the loader in following workflows) as X/features without any additional processing.
2. Data Preprocessing:
- Convert data types correctly (e.g., numeric, categorical, date parsing).
- Optimize memory usage for large datasets using techniques like downcasting or reading data in chunks if necessary.
- Domain-Specific Handling:
- Apply competition-specific preprocessing steps as needed (e.g., text tokenization, image resizing).
- Instead of returning binary bytes directly, convert/decode them into more useful formats like numpy.ndarrays.
3. Code Standards:
- DO NOT use progress bars (e.g., `tqdm`).
- DO NOT use the sample submission file to extract test index information.
- DO NOT exclude features inadvertently during this process.
4. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) [Required]:
- Before returning the data, you should always add an EDA part describing the data to help the following steps understand the data better.
- The EDA part should be drafted in plain text with certain format schema with no more than ten thousand characters.
- An evaluation agent will help to check whether the EDA part is added correctly.
5. NOTES
- Never use sample submission as the test index, as it may not be the same as the test data. Use the test index file or test data source to get the test index.
FeatureEng: |-
1. Well handle the shape of the data
- The sample size of the train data and the test data should be the same in all scenarios.
- To some tabular or time-series data, you may add or remove some columns so your inferred column number may be unsure.
- For scenarios where each dimension does not have a special meaning (like image, audio, and so on), the input shape and the output shape should be exactly the same in most cases unless there is a compelling reason to change them.
2. Integration with the Model Pipeline:
- If feature engineering is deferred to the model pipeline for better overall performance, state explicitly that it will be handled at the model stage.
- Model-related operations should not be implemented in this step. (e.g., it uses tools combined with models like torch.Dataset with rich data transformation/augmentation)
- Otherwise, ensure this function applies all required transformations while avoiding data leakage.
3. General Considerations:
- Ensure scalability for large datasets.
- Handle missing values and outliers appropriately (e.g., impute, remove, or replace).
- Ensure consistency between feature data types and transformations.
- Prevent data leakage: Do not use information derived from the test set when transforming training data.
4. Code Standards:
- Avoid using progress bars (e.g., `tqdm`) in the implementation.
5. Notes:
- GPU and multiprocessing are available and are encouraged to use for accelerating transformations.
- Feature engineering should be executed **once** and reused across all models to ensure consistency: `X_transformed, y_transformed, X_test_transformed = feat_eng(X, y, X_test)`
- If the data loader returns the file path directly, we can skip feature engineering and return original values directly.
Model: |-
- Do not use progress bars (e.g., `tqdm`) in the implementation.
- The device has GPU support, so you are encouraged to use it for training if necessary to accelerate the process.
- Some data transformations/augmentations can be included in this step (e.g., data tools provided by TensorFlow and Torch)
- Please correctly handle data transformations/augmentations, especially when the dataloader loads the file path directly.
- Ensure dynamic handling of feature dimensions to accommodate potential enhancements in input features without requiring code modifications.
Ensemble: |-
1. Input Validation:
- Handle empty or invalid inputs gracefully with appropriate error messages.
2. Metric Calculation and Storage:
- Calculate the metric (mentioned in the evaluation section of the competition information) for each model and ensemble strategy on valid, and save the results in `scores.csv`, e.g.:
```python
scores = {}
for model_name, val_pred in val_preds_dict.items():
scores[model_name] = calculate_metric(val_label, val_pred)
...
some code about ensemble strategy
...
ensemble_val_pred = ...
ensemble_score = calculate_metric(val_label, ensemble_val_pred)
scores["ensemble"] = ensemble_score # Ensure "ensemble" is explicitly stored
scores_df = pd.DataFrame(scores.items(), columns=["Model", <metric_name>])
scores_df.to_csv("scores.csv", index=False)
```
- Even if only one model is present, compute the ensemble score and store it under `"ensemble"`.
3. Code Standards:
- Do not use progress bars (e.g., tqdm) in the code.
4. Notes:
- Ensure flexibility to handle multiple ensemble strategies based on competition requirements.
Workflow: |-
Your task is to implement the main workflow script (`main.py`) for a Kaggle-style machine learning competition project.
Follow the provided project structure and specifications to ensure consistency and maintainability:
1. Workflow Integration:
- Integrate the following components into the workflow:
- Data loading (`load_data.py`).
- Feature engineering (`feature.py`).
- Model workflow for training and testing (`model_*.py`).
- Ensemble workflow that combines results from the model workflow to obtain the final prediction (`ensemble.py`).
- Treat each component as a modular and callable Python function.
- The workflow script should be flexible enough to handle either a single model or multiple models, with filenames (model_*.py) that are not determined at the outset.
For multiple model selection, utilize Python code to identify eligible models based on filenames, for example:
```python
available_models = [f for f in os.listdir('.') if f.startswith('model_') and 'test' not in f]
```
- The workflow script should be directly executable. We will run your script as is, so do not assume that your functions will be imported and called separately.
2. Feature Engineering
- The feature engineering should be called only once. For example:
`X_transformed, y_transformed, X_test_transformed = feat_eng(X, y, X_test)`
- It should be called before dataset splitting.
3. Dataset Splitting
- The dataset returned by `load_data` is not pre-split. After calling `feat_eng`, split the data into training and test sets.
- [Notice] If feasible, apply cross-validation on the training set (`X_transformed`, `y_transformed`) to ensure a reliable assessment of model performance.
- Keep the test set (`X_test_transformed`) unchanged, as it is only used for generating the final predictions.
- Pseudocode logic for reference:
```
Set number of splits and initialize KFold cross-validator.
Create dictionaries for validation and test predictions.
For each model file:
Import the model dynamically.
Initialize arrays for out-of-fold (OOF) and test predictions.
For each fold in KFold:
Split data into training and validation sets.
Run model workflow to get validation and test predictions.
Validate shapes.
Store validation and test predictions.
Compute average test predictions across folds.
Save OOF and averaged test predictions.
Ensemble predictions from all models and print the final shape.
```
4. Submission File:
- Save the final predictions as `submission.csv`, ensuring the format matches the competition requirements (refer to `sample_submission` in the Folder Description for the correct structure).
- Present the required submission format explicitly and ensure the output adheres to it.
5. Code Standards:
- Do not use progress bars (e.g., tqdm) in the code.
6. Ensemble Strategy:
Consolidate all model outputs into a dictionary, where each key is the model's filename (excluding the .py extension) and its corresponding value is the model's output.
Sample code:
{% raw %}
{% for model_name in model_names %}
model_module = __import__(model_name.replace('.py', ''))
val_pred, test_pred, _ = model_module.model_workflow(
X=train_X,
y=train_y,
val_X=val_X,
val_y=val_y,
test_X=X_test_transformed
)
val_preds_dict[model_module.__name__] = val_pred
test_preds_dict[model_module.__name__] = test_pred
{% endfor %}
final_pred = ensemble_workflow(test_preds_dict, val_preds_dict, val_y)
{% endraw %}
Pipeline: |-
0. Program Execution:
- The workflow will be executed by running `python main.py` with no command-line arguments. Ensure that `main.py` does not require or expect any parameters.
- The working directory will only contain `main.py`. Any additional files required for execution must be downloaded or generated by `main.py` itself.
1. File Handling:
- Handle file encoding and delimiters appropriately.
- Combine or process multiple files if necessary.
- Avoid using the sample submission file to infer test indices. If a dedicated test index file is available, use that. If not, use the order in the test file as the test index.
- Ensure you load the actual data from the files, not just the filenames or paths. Do not postpone data loading to later steps.
2. Data Preprocessing:
- Convert data types correctly (e.g., numeric, categorical, date parsing).
- Optimize memory usage for large datasets using techniques like downcasting or reading data in chunks if necessary.
- Domain-Specific Handling:
- Apply competition-specific preprocessing steps as needed (e.g., text tokenization, image resizing).
3. Code Standards:
- DO NOT use progress bars (e.g., `tqdm`).
- DO NOT use the sample submission file to extract test index information.
- DO NOT exclude features inadvertently during this process.
4. NOTES
- Never use sample submission as the test index, as it may not be the same as the test data. Use the test index file or test data source to get the test index.
- For neural network models, use pytorch rather than tensorflow as the backend if possible.
- For decision tree models, use xgboost or RandomForest rather than lightgbm as the backend if possible.
- For neural network models, it's always better to firstly try from a pretrained model and then fine-tune it rather than training from scratch.
5. General Considerations:
- Ensure scalability for large datasets.
- Handle missing values and outliers appropriately (e.g., impute, remove, or replace).
- Ensure consistency between feature data types and transformations.
- Prevent data leakage: Do not use information derived from the test set when transforming training data.
6. Notes:
- GPU and multiprocessing are available and are encouraged to use for accelerating transformations.
7. Metric Calculation and Storage:
- Calculate the metric (mentioned in the evaluation section of the competition information) for each model and ensemble strategy on valid, and save the results in `scores.csv`
- The evaluation should be based on 5-fold cross-validation but only if that's an appropriate evaluation for the task at hand. Store the mean validation score of 5-fold cross-validation in `scores.csv` on each model.
- Even if only one model is present, compute the ensemble score and store it under `"ensemble"`.
- The index of `scores.csv` should include the model name and the "ensemble" strategy. "ensemble" should be exactly in the index with all lower case letters. Ensemble is the result from several models. If only one model is present, the ensemble score should be the same as the model score.
- The column names in `scores.csv` should be:
- Model: The name of the model or ensemble strategy.
- <metric_name>: The calculated metric value for that model or ensemble strategy. The metric name can be found in the scenario description. The metric name should be exactly the same as the one in the scenario description since user will use it to check the result.
- Validation metrics should be aligned across all ideas and implementations. Avoid proposing ideas that might affect the validation metrics and modifying the related code.
8. Submission File:
- Save the final predictions as `submission.csv`, ensuring the format matches the competition requirements (refer to `sample_submission` in the Folder Description for the correct structure).
- Present the required submission format explicitly and ensure the output adheres to it.
guidelines:
coding: |-
You might receive exploratory data analysis (EDA) details about the source data. Do not use this EDA information to create assertions or raise errors. We might generate sample data for quick coding (so your code may run on sample data which is part of the full-size data), but remember that the EDA details are based on the full-size data.