From f9f46fce1b42259b1e5f3b334e299a949d75b346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WinstonLiyt <104308117+WinstonLiyt@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:14:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] fix a bug in feature selection prompt (#333)

---
 rdagent/scenarios/kaggle/prompts.yaml | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/rdagent/scenarios/kaggle/prompts.yaml b/rdagent/scenarios/kaggle/prompts.yaml
index e2580e4c..53213242 100644
--- a/rdagent/scenarios/kaggle/prompts.yaml
+++ b/rdagent/scenarios/kaggle/prompts.yaml
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@ feature_selection_feedback_generation:
     Result: {{exp.result}}
 
     Available Features:
-    {% for feature in available_features %}
-    - {{feature.name}}: {{feature.description}}
-      Shape: {{feature.shape}}
+    {% for feature, shape in available_features %}
+      Features description: {{feature}}
+      Feature shape: {{shape}}
     {% endfor %}
 
     Compare and observe the results. Which result has a better return and lower risk? If the performance increases, the hypothesis should be considered positive (working).