mirror of
https://github.com/NicolasBohn/NexQuant.git
synced 2026-07-27 23:47:46 +00:00
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import copy
|
||||
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||||
from typing import Any
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Feedback:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Knowledge:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class QueriedKnowledge:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class KnowledgeBase(ABC):
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def query(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
) -> QueriedKnowledge | None:
|
||||
raise NotImplementedError
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class EvolvableSubjects:
|
||||
"""The target object to be evolved"""
|
||||
|
||||
def clone(self) -> EvolvableSubjects:
|
||||
return copy.deepcopy(self)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class QlibEvolvableSubjects(EvolvableSubjects): ...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Evaluator(ABC):
|
||||
"""Both external EvolvableSubjects and internal evovler, it is
|
||||
|
||||
FAQ:
|
||||
- Q: If we have a external whitebox evaluator, do we need a
|
||||
intenral EvolvableSubjects?
|
||||
A: When the external evovler is very complex, maybe a internal LLM-based evovler
|
||||
may provide more understandable feedbacks.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def evaluate(self, evo: EvolvableSubjects, **kwargs: Any) -> Feedback:
|
||||
raise NotImplementedError
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class SelfEvaluator(Evaluator):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class EvoStep:
|
||||
"""At a specific step,
|
||||
based on
|
||||
- previous trace
|
||||
- newly RAG kownledge `QueriedKnowledge`
|
||||
|
||||
the EvolvableSubjects is evolved to a new one `EvolvableSubjects`.
|
||||
|
||||
(optional) After evaluation, we get feedback `feedback`.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
evolvable_subjects: EvolvableSubjects
|
||||
queried_knowledge: QueriedKnowledge | None = None
|
||||
feedback: Feedback | None = None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class EvolvingStrategy(ABC):
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def evolve(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
*evo: EvolvableSubjects,
|
||||
evolving_trace: list[EvoStep] | None = None,
|
||||
queried_knowledge: QueriedKnowledge | None = None,
|
||||
**kwargs: Any,
|
||||
) -> EvolvableSubjects:
|
||||
"""The evolving trace is a list of (evolvable_subjects, feedback) ordered
|
||||
according to the time.
|
||||
|
||||
The reason why the parameter is important for the evolving.
|
||||
- evolving_trace: the historical feedback is important.
|
||||
- queried_knowledge: queried knowledge
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class RAGStrategy(ABC):
|
||||
"""Retrival Augmentation Generation Strategy"""
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, knowledgebase: KnowledgeBase) -> None:
|
||||
self.knowledgebase = knowledgebase
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def query(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
evo: EvolvableSubjects,
|
||||
evolving_trace: list[EvoStep],
|
||||
**kwargs: Any,
|
||||
) -> QueriedKnowledge | None:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def generate_knowledge(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
evolving_trace: list[EvoStep],
|
||||
*,
|
||||
return_knowledge: bool = False,
|
||||
**kwargs: Any,
|
||||
) -> Knowledge | None:
|
||||
"""Generating new knowledge based on the evolving trace.
|
||||
- It is encouraged to query related knowledge before generating new knowledge.
|
||||
|
||||
RAGStrategy should maintain the new knowledge all by itself.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class EvoAgent:
|
||||
"""It is responsible for driving the workflow."""
|
||||
|
||||
evolving_trace: list[EvoStep]
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
evolving_strategy: EvolvingStrategy,
|
||||
rag: RAGStrategy | None = None,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
self.evolving_trace = []
|
||||
self.evolving_strategy = evolving_strategy
|
||||
self.rag = rag
|
||||
|
||||
def step_evolving(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
evo: EvolvableSubjects,
|
||||
eva: Evaluator | Feedback,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
with_knowledge: bool = False,
|
||||
with_feedback: bool = True,
|
||||
knowledge_self_gen: bool = False,
|
||||
) -> EvolvableSubjects:
|
||||
"""Common evolving mode are supported in this api .
|
||||
- Interactive evolving:
|
||||
- `with_feedback=True` and `eva` is a external Evaluator.
|
||||
|
||||
- Knowledge-driven evolving:
|
||||
- `with_knowledge=True` and related knowledge are
|
||||
queried based on `self.rag`
|
||||
|
||||
- Self-evolving: we have two ways to self-evolve.
|
||||
- 1) self generating knowledge and then evolve
|
||||
- `knowledge_self_gen=True` and `with_knowledge=True`
|
||||
- 2) self evaluate to generate feedback and then evolve
|
||||
- `with_feedback=True` and `eva` is a internal Evaluator.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# knowledge self-evolving
|
||||
if knowledge_self_gen and self.rag is not None:
|
||||
self.rag.generate_knowledge(self.evolving_trace)
|
||||
|
||||
# RAG
|
||||
queried_knowledge = None
|
||||
if with_knowledge and self.rag is not None:
|
||||
queried_knowledge = self.rag.query(evo, self.evolving_trace)
|
||||
|
||||
# Evolve
|
||||
evo = self.evolving_strategy.evolve(
|
||||
evo=evo,
|
||||
evolving_trace=self.evolving_trace,
|
||||
queried_knowledge=queried_knowledge,
|
||||
)
|
||||
es = EvoStep(evo, queried_knowledge)
|
||||
|
||||
# Evaluate
|
||||
if with_feedback:
|
||||
es.feedback = eva if isinstance(eva, Feedback) else eva.evaluate(evo, queried_knowledge=queried_knowledge)
|
||||
|
||||
# Update trace
|
||||
self.evolving_trace.append(es)
|
||||
return evo
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user