From abe923ea8462e18b5bf33b5751eef0df95e21c41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WinstonLiyt <104308117+WinstonLiyt@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 14:15:43 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a small bug in the hypothesis prompts.

---
 rdagent/scenarios/qlib/prompts.yaml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/rdagent/scenarios/qlib/prompts.yaml b/rdagent/scenarios/qlib/prompts.yaml
index d1936480..3cc50a95 100644
--- a/rdagent/scenarios/qlib/prompts.yaml
+++ b/rdagent/scenarios/qlib/prompts.yaml
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ hypothesis_and_feedback: |-
 hypothesis_output_format: |-
   The output should follow JSON format. The schema is as follows:
   {
-    "hypothesis": "The new hypothesis generated based on the information provided.", Note that this should focus on model architecture, not training process or feature engineering or anything else
+    "hypothesis": "The new hypothesis generated based on the information provided.",
     "reason": "The reason why you generate this hypothesis. It should be comprehensive and logical. It should cover the other keys below and extend them.",
     "concise_reason": Two line summary. First line focuses on the a concise justification for the change. 2nd Line learns from first line and previous experiences (hypothesis & experiments & code & feedbacks) to generalise a knowledge statement (use tend to/because/if/generally/etc. ). This is the summary of the three keys below. 
     "concise_observation": One line summary. It focuses on the observation of the given scenario, data characteristics, or previous experiences (failures & succeses).